ABC News (US), on Iran, 26 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Delegations meet in Iran with Mideast region on edge over potential for renewed fighting

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

CAIRO -- High-level delegations from Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkey were in Tehran on Monday for meetings with Iranian authorities to try to avert renewed fighting in the Iran war , Iran's Foreign Ministry said. The talks came as many in Iran are anxious about a possible return to all-out war. Israeli and American leaders have been sharpening their threats before elections in both countries , while Iranian leaders have remained defiant.

Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman, Pakistani army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir and Ibrahim Kalin, the head of Turkey’s intelligence service, met with Iran’s top security officials and negotiators to push for a deal between Tehran and Washington. The war in Yemen and strikes by Iran-backed Houthi rebels against Saudi Arabia were also topics of the talks, according to two regional officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to speak with reporters.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei told reporters in Tehran that the agenda for the meeting wasn't set, but the talks would “undoubtedly address the most pressing threats to regional security.” Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said during the talks Monday that Iran supports any agreement that would deepen regional cooperation, resolve differences and make greater use of the shared resources and capabilities of Islamic countries.

Saudi Arabia said in a statement that the delegations hoped to find “ways to de-escalate tensions, enhance regional security and promote its stability.” Qatari mediators also traveled to Tehran on Sunday, working in coordination with the United States, as part of efforts to de-escalate regional tensions, according to a regional official speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the talks. Pakistan and Qatar helped broker an agreement in June aimed at having Iran fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz to shipping, ending a U.S. blockade of Iranian ports and opening negotiations on a broader settlement addressing Iran’s nuclear program.

The deal unraveled quickly, however, as both sides renewed attacks. With worries about renewed fighting before Israel's election on Tuesday and the U.S. midterm election on Nov. 3, Baghaei said over the weekend that Iran hadn't closed the window of diplomacy and that messages were being passed to the United States through intermediaries. With negotiations long stalled, he said that the U.S. appears to be persisting in unilateral demands and that U.S. President Donald Trump and other American officials repeatedly use the phrase “complete surrender,” which Baghaei said that no Iranian accepts.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu , meanwhile, repeated his warning on Sunday that Iran or its proxies could launch an attack before the close election to disrupt the vote, citing intelligence. “The (military) is ready both to defend and to strike,” he said in a video statement. “You will suffer disproportionate blows far greater than you can imagine.” Israel’s Channel 12 reported Sunday night that Netanyahu and his military chief of staff clashed over an instruction by Netanyahu to carry out an “action” that the army believes could quickly trigger a resumption of the conflict with Iran.

Netanyahu’s office later described the report as “fake news.” In a post on X, Defense Minister Israel Katz said that reports about “rifts between the political leadership and the IDF concerning Iran are completely baseless and false.” Popular Reads Trump told DOJ to sue to block Alaska Senate results if Republican narrowly loses Oct 23 Amy Acton says Trump, Vance should 'look at the facts' after Ramaswamy attack ad 21 hours ago Airman killed rappelling from Alamodome's ceiling in Salute to Armed Forces ceremony Oct 19 “I state unequivocally that there has been no intention by Israel of initiating an attack on Iran before the elections in Israel,” Katz said.

Left out here: Drops what it reported before

ABC gives two sentences of Katz's denial that Israel intends to attack before the election, but drops what it reported the day before: that Netanyahu had asserted the need to topple Iran's leadership. ABC also reported then that concerns had been raised that he might want to attack to stay in office.

How we know

“We made it clear that should Iran attack Israel, we would respond with great force.” In Tehran, when asked whether Iran was planning attacks, Baghaei on Monday only said that “the Israeli regime is highly skilled at carrying out false-flag operations.” “The Islamic Republic of Iran will not hesitate to exercise its inherent right to self-defense to protect Iran’s sovereignty, territorial integrity, and independence,” he said. Yemen has become a widening front in the Iran war that began in February, with the Houthis increasingly launching attacks on Saudi Arabia because it supports Yemen’s internationally recognized government battling the rebels.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article calls it 'the Iran war' that 'began in February' and never says that the United States and Israel launched it. The reader is left to read Israeli warnings that Iran might attack, and Katz's denial of any plan to initiate an attack, with no knowledge of who started the war the talks are trying to stop resuming.

How we know

The conflict has intensified since forces from the internationally recognized government and Saudi-led coalition launched airstrikes on Houthi-held Sanaa International Airport in July, shattering a 2022 ceasefire deal that largely stopped the fighting in the country’s civil war. Early Monday, Houthi military spokesperson Yahya Saree said that the rebel group had fired ballistic missiles at military gatherings and weapons depots belonging to Saudi-backed government forces in Aden and Lahj provinces.

He said that the attacks destroyed military equipment and caused casualties, but didn't provide evidence. The Associated Press couldn’t independently verify the information. Residents in Houthi-held Sanaa and on the Red Sea coast reported a series of explosions. Houthi media said that airstrikes targeted a solar power system and a water well in Sanaa, . In the port city of Mokha, recently seized by the Houthis, residents said that rockets hit several buildings, including a hospital.

Houthi-run al-Masirah channel also reported strikes in Saada, in northern Yemen, and in southwestern Taiz province, where the rebels and Saudi-backed government forces have been fighting for weeks. , four ballistic missile launchers and other missile storage. Meanwhile, Egypt’s parliament on Monday approved a request from President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi to provide military support to Saudi Arabia to help defend against Houthi attacks. ___ Victoria Eastwood and Fatma Khaled in Cairo, Natalie Melzer in Tel Aviv, Israel, Munir Ahmed in Islamabad, Ahmed al-Haj in Aden, Yemen, and David Rising in Bangkok, contributed to this report.

Read the original article on abcnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

ABC News reports the regional talks in Tehran fairly. In its Yemen section it flags Houthi claims as unproven but gives the Saudi-led coalition's tally of destroyed missile sites with no such caveat. It also never says the US and Israel launched the war, and it leaves out its own earlier report that Netanyahu called for toppling Iran's leadership while giving Katz's denial of any attack plan.

  1. Doubts one side's claims and not the other's

    Minor

    “but offered no proof”

    Why this matters
    ABC tacks 'but offered no proof' onto the Houthi account of strikes on a solar power system and a water well.
    The impression it gives
    A reader treats the report of civilian infrastructure being hit as doubtful.
    The context
    Three sentences later ABC reports the coalition's own claims of what its strikes destroyed with no such qualifier. The two sides' battlefield claims get unequal scepticism.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“destroyed five tunnels used for storing ballistic missiles”

    Show it in the article

    “The spokesperson for the Saudi-led coalition said that an operation in Houthi-controlled territory destroyed five tunnels used for storing ballistic missiles”

    Why this matters
    ABC passes on the coalition spokesperson's precise tally of missile tunnels and launchers with no note that it is unverified or unproven.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the coalition's account of a strike on military targets as reliable, while the Houthi claims around it are flagged as unproven.
    The context
    ABC applies 'didn't provide evidence', 'couldn't independently verify' and 'offered no proof' to Houthi statements in the same section, but not to this one. The coalition's claim is no better evidenced in the article.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“but didn't provide evidence”
    • Elsewhere in the article“independently verify the information”

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article calls it 'the Iran war' that 'began in February' and never says that the United States and Israel launched it. The reader is left to read Israeli warnings that Iran might attack, and Katz's denial of any plan to initiate an attack, with no knowledge of who started the war the talks are trying to stop resuming.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  3. Drops what it reported before

    Minor

    What is missing

    ABC gives two sentences of Katz's denial that Israel intends to attack before the election, but drops what it reported the day before: that Netanyahu had asserted the need to topple Iran's leadership. ABC also reported then that concerns had been raised that he might want to attack to stay in office.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from ABC News (US)

  1. 26 OctDelegations meet in Iran with Mideast on edge over potential for renewed fighting3.0
  2. 25 OctIranians fear a possible return to all-out war as US and Israeli elections approach3.0
  3. 25 OctIran says messages are still being passed to the US amid war concerns, and other Mideast news3.0
  4. 24 OctIran remains open to talks with US under Pakistan-brokered deal, envoy says0.0
  5. 22 OctUS and Israel drawing up plans to resume attacks on Iran post-election, sources say3.0

Everything we scored from ABC News (US)

See how 187 outlets covered this story