Press TV, on Iran, 24 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Twelve countries warn against normalizing attacks on peaceful nuclear sites

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Iran and 11 other countries have warned that attacks against nuclear facilities under International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards must never be accepted as normal, stressing that such actions violate international law and threaten nuclear safety and global non-proliferation efforts.

“Nuclear facilities shall never, under any circumstances, be subjected to attack or threat of attack,” the countries said in a joint statement delivered at the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly’s First Committee on Friday.

The statement was issued by Belarus, Burkina Faso, China, Cuba, Eritrea, Iran, Nicaragua, Niger, Pakistan, Russia, Tajikistan and Zimbabwe, addressing the prohibition of attacks and threats against nuclear sites dedicated to peaceful purposes.

The countries reaffirmed “the inalienable right of all states to develop research, production, and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination.”

They underscored that attacks or threats against nuclear facilities violate the principles of the UN Charter, international law and the IAEA Statute, adding that such actions are “profoundly inconsistent with the objects and purposes of the NPT,” referring to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

The statement also recalled UN Security Council Resolution 487 (1981), which strongly condemned a military attack against nuclear facilities, as well as relevant decisions and resolutions adopted by the IAEA General Conference.

The 12 countries warned that attacks against nuclear facilities have “grave implications for nuclear safety, nuclear security” and pose a serious threat to the credibility and effectiveness of the IAEA safeguards system and the wider global non-proliferation framework.

They also cautioned that such attacks could undermine the peaceful use of nuclear energy and international cooperation, potentially triggering radioactive releases with severe consequences both inside and beyond the affected country.

“Silence in the face of attacks against safeguarded nuclear facilities undermines established international norms, erodes confidence in the international legal order, and risks the normalization of such attacks,” the statement said.

The countries underlined the importance of fully implementing the IAEA’s objectives, particularly its mandate to expand the contribution of atomic energy to “peace, health, and prosperity throughout the world.”

The statement urged governments to express “a clear and unequivocal opposition to any attack, or threat of attack, against nuclear facilities,” emphasizing the need for a united international response to prevent such actions from becoming an accepted practice.

The joint statement comes after two rounds of US-Israeli military attacks on Iran in 2025 and 2026, which targeted Iran’s peaceful nuclear facilities.

In June 2025, Israel attacked Iran’s nuclear facilities, including Natanz, before the United States struck the Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan nuclear complexes .

, with US-Israeli attacks targeting military and nuclear-related sites across Iran. The assaults targeted facilities involved in uranium production, heavy-water production, and nuclear research.

Read the original article on presstv.ir (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Press TV reports a joint statement by twelve countries against attacks on safeguarded nuclear sites, and it quotes the statement accurately. In its closing background, Press TV calls the Israeli and US strikes on Iran a war of aggression in its own voice. Other coverage the same day attributes that label to Iran's UN envoy.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “in a 12-day war of aggression against the country”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls the June 2025 strikes a "war of aggression" in its own narration, with no source attached.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes it as an established legal finding that the June 2025 Israeli and US strikes were a war of aggression.
    The context
    "War of aggression" is Iran's characterisation. Tehran Times, reporting the same day, puts the phrase in the mouth of Iran's UN envoy, Gholamhossein Darzi. The article cites no ruling or body that has made that finding.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “The second round of aggression began on February 28, 2026”

    Why this matters
    Press TV repeats the label for the February 2026 attacks, again in its own voice, and makes "aggression" the plain name of the event.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes the 2026 strikes, too, as aggression by definition rather than as something Iran calls aggression.
    The context
    Iran's envoy made this claim. The same day's coverage reports it as his statement, not as fact.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Press TV

  1. 24 OctIran presented no new proposals to Pakistani mediator on Hormuz: Report6.0
  2. 24 OctIRGC warns ‘apocalyptic war’ will reverberate beyond Iran, shape region’s fate6.0
  3. 24 OctIran will not allow ‘rusty’ US military vessels to re-enter Persian Gulf: Top commander6.0
  4. 24 OctIranian intelligence, IRGC forces arrest two over collaboration with foreign spy agencies8.2
  5. 24 OctNo state can rewrite NPT to undermine Tehran’s right to nuclear energy: Iran at UN6.0

Everything we scored from Press TV