Press TV, on Iran, 24 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Iran presented no new proposals to Pakistani mediator on Hormuz: Report

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

An informed source has rejected media claims that Iran has presented any new proposals to the Pakistani mediator on the Strait of Hormuz, stressing that Tehran’s existing seven-day plan outlining its conditions for reopening the strategic waterway was already conveyed to the Americans.

Speaking to the Tasnim news agency on Saturday, consistent with what the source called the “quasi-media outlet’s” pattern of false reporting on Iran.

The Al-Arabiya reports alleged that Iran had offered to reopen the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for the lifting of the US maritime blockade.

“Iran does not accept any arrangement based on the equation of the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for the blockade,” the source said.

Tehran is instead circumventing the restrictions through its own methods and will ultimately break them, the source added.

The informed official emphasized that Iran’s seven-day plan, which includes Tehran’s demands for the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, had previously been transferred to the American side through mediators.

Until all of Iran’s demands are met, one of which is the removal of disruptions to Iranian ports and shipping, .

“The whole world knows very well that the cause of insecurity in the Strait of Hormuz is the aggressive and interventionist actions of the United States,” the source stated. “For this reason, stopping these illegal actions is a common demand of the countries of the region and the world.”

The Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding was reached in June after . The agreement had called for an end to hostilities on all fronts, the lifting of , restoration of commercial traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, and subsequent negotiations on other issues.

Iranian officials, including Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, have repeatedly stated that Tehran remains open to diplomacy but insists on the full implementation of prior commitments and its legitimate conditions before any reopening of the waterway or return to broader talks.

Recent high-level visits by Pakistani officials, including Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir and Interior Minister Mohsen Naqvi, have been part of continued mediation efforts, with Iran conveying its firm positions on the need to end the blockade and restore security under Iranian arrangements.

The Strait of Hormuz has remained under Iranian control amid the standoff. Iranian authorities have underscored that any path forward must begin with the US ending its interventionist actions and fulfilling its obligations, rather than pursuing new or revised formulas that ignore Tehran’s demands.

Read the original article on presstv.ir (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Press TV reports an anonymous Iranian source's denial of an Al-Arabiya report, but in its own narration it adopts Tehran's side of the dispute: it calls the US blockade illegal, the February attacks aggression and the United States 'the American enemy' without attributing any of it. The article also gives Al-Arabiya and the US no reply, so the source's charge of fabrication stands alone.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “the insecurity imposed by the American enemy in the Strait of Hormuz will not be eliminated”

    Why this matters
    Press TV writes this sentence with no attribution. It calls the United States "the American enemy" and says it "imposed" the insecurity in the strait, in the outlet's own narration.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes it as established fact that the US alone caused the insecurity in the strait, and that the US is the reader's enemy as well as Iran's.
    The context
    This is the anonymous source's position. The next sentence puts the same claim in the source's mouth as a quote. A former Pakistani prime minister says both the US and Iran hold maximalist positions that block a settlement.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “the US-Israeli aggression that began in late February”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls the US-Israeli attacks "aggression" in its own voice and sets no facts beside the word.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes "aggression" as the settled legal and factual description of the February attacks, not as Tehran's description.
    The context
    The article gives no facts about how the attacks began. Other coverage of the same events describes them neutrally as US-Israeli operations against Iran.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “the illegal US naval blockade on Iranian ports”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls the blockade "illegal" in its own voice while describing the terms of the Islamabad agreement.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes the agreement itself, or some ruling, found the blockade illegal.
    The context
    The article cites no ruling or legal finding. Illegality is the Iranian source's charge: in S9 the source calls them "these illegal actions". Other coverage calls it the US blockade of Iran's seaports.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The source said the insecurity in the Strait of Hormuz, which Tehran blames on the United States, will not end until Iran's demands are met. The Islamabad memorandum, reached in June after the US-Israeli attacks on Iran that began in February, called for lifting the US naval blockade, which Iran calls illegal.

  2. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “the source described reports by the Saudi outlet Al-Arabiya as “a lie and fabrication,””

    Why this matters
    Press TV gives an unnamed source room to call Al-Arabiya's report a lie and a pattern of false reporting. It includes no response from Al-Arabiya and no account from the US or Pakistani side.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes the denial as the whole story and Al-Arabiya's report as plainly false.
    The context
    The article has only Iranian voices. Al-Arabiya, US officials and Pakistani mediators do not appear, although other coverage carries a Pakistani account of the talks.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Press TV

  1. 24 OctIRGC warns ‘apocalyptic war’ will reverberate beyond Iran, shape region’s fate6.0
  2. 24 OctIran will not allow ‘rusty’ US military vessels to re-enter Persian Gulf: Top commander6.0
  3. 24 OctIranian intelligence, IRGC forces arrest two over collaboration with foreign spy agencies8.2
  4. 24 OctTwelve countries warn against normalizing attacks on peaceful nuclear sites3.0
  5. 24 OctNo state can rewrite NPT to undermine Tehran’s right to nuclear energy: Iran at UN6.0

Everything we scored from Press TV