Ynet News (English), on West Bank, 26 October 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

Not just Iran: Netanyahu defies IDF chief over continuing Hebron operation

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

The military operation in Hebron, launched after a deadly shooting attack killed two IDF soldiers, has become another point of contention between the military leadership and Israel's political leadership, just a day before Tuesday's election. While troops from the IDF's 98th Division continue intensive operations involving searches for weapons, arrests of suspects, and , military officials believe that the limited operational results so far warrant reassessing whether the operation should continue in its current form.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never gives the scale of the expulsions or says that Netanyahu himself announced them as part of a pledge to destroy the neighbourhood the attackers came from. It also omits that B'Tselem warned of collective punishment. Without this, a reader believes the displacement is a passing side effect of weapons searches, not a declared policy ordered from the top.

How we know

According to sources familiar with the discussions, IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir presented his position during a meeting with the political leadership, attended by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz, arguing that the time had come to end the operation. Netanyahu and Katz, however, rejected that assessment and instructed the military to continue. Ultimately, the chief of staff's recommendation was not accepted, and the decision was made to keep the operation underway.

The IDF has pointed, among other concerns, to the legal difficulties involved in keeping Palestinian residents away from their homes for extended periods, particularly when the operation is not producing significant military gains. So far, troops have made arrests and located a limited number of weapons, but have not uncovered unusual weaponry or large weapons stockpiles.

The political leadership, however, presents a different assessment. Officials argue that the two terrorists who carried out the deadly attack were armed with automatic weapons and substantial quantities of ammunition, making it necessary for the IDF to continue searching for additional weapons in the area. They also maintain that prolonging the operation will strengthen deterrence. Security officials explain that the very presence of large IDF forces operating inside Hebron creates a psychological impact among Palestinians, particularly because the troops have entered a major Palestinian city rather than refugee camps, as they did during previous operations in Jenin, Nur Shams and Tulkarem.

The current disagreement recalls an IDF operation in the Qalandiya refugee camp in August. At the time, the military defined its objectives as targeting terrorist operatives and infrastructure. Katz also pushed for a large-scale operation and again raised the possibility of taking control of another refugee camp, similar to the operations carried out in Jenin, Tulkarem and Nur Shams.

IDF officials said the military had operational plans for every refugee camp but had not mobilized forces to carry them out because there was no operational necessity. There was also tension over contingency planning for a scenario known in the military as a "turning of the guns," involving a possible armed escalation in which Palestinian security forces turn their weapons against Israel. Katz presented the IDF's extensive and aggressive plan for such a scenario, although intelligence assessments at the time did not indicate that an escalation of that kind was imminent in the West Bank.

It is important to note that the prolonged military operations in refugee camps in the northern West Bank, which Katz was among those pushing for and which were conducted under Central Command chief Maj. Gen. Avi Bluth, led to a significant decline in terrorist activity in the area, according to Israeli security assessments.

However, the Qalandiya operation ended after just two days and, based on the information available so far, did not produce significant operational results. Now, in Hebron, the question is once again whether continuing the operation is likely to yield further results or whether it has already achieved its main objectives.

But the debate over the Hebron operation is unfolding against a broader and more complicated security backdrop. The IDF is currently also focused on preventing the next attack, particularly attacks carried out by lone assailants inspired by previous incidents. Security officials are concerned about copycat attacks that could develop following exposure to incitement on social media and military activity on the ground. Central Command is therefore concentrating its efforts on identifying threats early, thwarting potential attackers and preventing an escalation that could emerge from several directions.

The IDF stresses that such conditions require precise, targeted counterterrorism operations, accompanied by constant assessments of their operational value and their consequences on the ground. The concern is that an escalation could develop rapidly, making it necessary to consider not only existing threats but also the reactions military operations themselves could provoke.

Against this backdrop, the Hebron operation illustrates the tension between the political leadership's demand to continue military activity in pursuit of deterrence and additional weapons discoveries, and the IDF's position that the operational benefits must be weighed against .

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

Ynet reports the split between Netanyahu and the army chief over the Hebron raid, but describes the forced removal of Palestinians from their homes as an "evacuation" and their demolished buildings as "unauthorized structures". It leaves out the scale of the expulsions and Netanyahu's own pledge to "destroy this place", so a reader sees the displacement as a side effect of weapons searches. Palestinians appear only as a "population" weighed in an Israeli debate, and the city is never called occupied.

  1. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “the evacuation of Palestinian residents”

    Why this matters
    Ynet calls the removal of Palestinians from their homes "the evacuation of Palestinian residents", a word for moving people out of danger for their own good.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes residents were moved out temporarily and for their safety while troops searched for weapons.
    The context
    Other reports of the same raid say Israeli forces expelled hundreds of Palestinians from their homes, and Netanyahu said the army "will evacuate the residents" of the neighbourhood he vowed to destroy. The article never says expelled or displaced.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “the demolition of unauthorized structures”

    Why this matters
    Ynet calls what troops are knocking down "unauthorized structures", taking the army's permit language as its own description.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes troops are removing illegal sheds or buildings with no lawful standing, not people's homes and businesses.
    The context
    The UN rights chief said the raid has "demolished homes and commercial property" and called on Israel to compensate for unlawful demolitions. The demolitions were carried out by an occupying force in an occupied city.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Troops from the 98th Division are searching for weapons and arresting suspects, and have expelled hundreds of Palestinians from their homes in Hebron and demolished homes and commercial property.

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The article never gives the scale of the expulsions or says that Netanyahu himself announced them as part of a pledge to destroy the neighbourhood the attackers came from. It also omits that B'Tselem warned of collective punishment. Without this, a reader believes the displacement is a passing side effect of weapons searches, not a declared policy ordered from the top.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  3. Hedges the documented record

    Minor

    “near the West Bank city”

    Why this matters
    Ynet calls Hebron simply a "West Bank city" and never uses the word occupied anywhere in a report about an army raid on it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the raid as an operation on Israel's own ground, with no legal status at issue.
    The context
    The ICJ found Israel's occupation of the West Bank unlawful. Other reports of the same event call Hebron an occupied West Bank city.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  4. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “the consequences of prolonging the operation for the local Palestinian population”

    Why this matters
    Ynet ends with Palestinians as "the local Palestinian population", a cost weighed by Israeli officials. Every voice in the article is the army, the government or security officials.
    The impression it gives
    A reader learns how Israeli officials argue about the raid but hears nothing from the people living under it.
    The context
    Hebron's mayor called the city "a disaster zone", and B'Tselem called for pressure against collective punishment. No Palestinian, rights group or UN voice appears in the article.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

  1. 25 Oct‘He had so many dreams’: Israel mourns soldier killed in West Bank shooting attack7.3
  2. 25 OctIsrael's fate will be decided in the West Bank, not just at the ballot box0.0
  3. 25 OctIsrael fears copycat attacks ahead of election after deadly West Bank terror shooting8.8
  4. 25 OctIsrael fears copycat attacks ahead of election after deadly West Bank terror shooting7.3
  5. 23 OctHebron shooting kills 2; IDF probes AFP photographer's presence8.8

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)