Ynet News (English), on West Bank, 23 October 2026

8.8out of 10Serious

Hebron shooting kills 2;

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.10 findings

IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir praised soldiers from the Home Front Command's Ari Battalion who the two Palestinian terrorists in a shooting attack near Hebron on Friday morning. Two of the five people wounded in the attack later died of their injuries. "The soldiers' swift action prevented an even more serious attack and further harm to civilians and security forces," Zamir said during a situational assessment with the Judea Brigade.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says that the two people who died were IOF soldiers or that the gunmen opened fire on a checkpoint at a city exit. It stresses a planned attack on civilians, so a reader is left believing civilians were killed.

How we know

Footage of the attack shows the terrorists preparing to open fire, returning to their vehicle to collect more weapons and ammunition, climbing over a fence and continuing to shoot.

Two of the other wounded were listed in moderate condition and one was lightly wounded. Both terrorists killed in the attack were identified as Hamas affiliates.

An AFP photographer at the scene documented the terrorists exchanging fire and reloading their weapons, as well as their bodies lying on the ground after they were killed. The IDF is expected to examine the photographer's account to determine .

were identified as Hamouda Wael Mohammed Jaaba, 27, and his relative Firas Samir Mohammed Jaaba, 27, both from Hebron. Both were married and had two children.

According to security officials, a large quantity of explosives and ammunition was found in the terrorists' vehicle. Investigators believe the attackers had intended to reach major roads and continue into Israel to carry out a larger attack against civilians, but encountered IDF troops on Route 35. Authorities are still investigating their intended destination and whether they acted independently or were directed by an outside organization.

An initial investigation found that the terrorists changed their intended target after arriving in the area, leaving their vehicle and opening fire. The close-range gunbattle lasted more than 20 minutes, during which the attackers used automatic weapons and took cover. Additional troops, including a deputy battalion commander from a neighboring sector, joined the fighting before soldiers flanked the terrorists and killed them.

The assessment following the shooting attack was also attended by the head of the IDF Central Command, the head of the Operations Directorate, the head of Military Intelligence and other senior commanders. Details presented during the assessment indicated that the terrorists were killed by the deputy commander of the Ari Battalion and a company commander who rushed to the scene.

During the assessment, Zamir approved Central Command's plans to impose a full cordon around Hebron and additional villages in the area, alongside intensified efforts to carry out further arrests and strengthen intelligence operations in the region.

Zamir also instructed the military to prepare to deploy additional troops to Central Command as required by operational needs.

"This was a serious terrorist attack," Zamir said. "The soldiers' swift action prevented an even more serious attack and further harm to civilians and security forces. A large quantity of ammunition was found in the vehicle the terrorists used to reach the scene, intended for a much larger-scale attack."

After the IDF announced that it had imposed a cordon around villages in the area, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he had instructed the IDF and security forces during a situational assessment "to immediately impose a cordon around Hebron and prepare for a full lockdown of all of Judea and Samaria beginning Friday."

Israeli forces subsequently imposed a full cordon around Hebron and Halhul, . Central Command also established checkpoints to prevent possible copycat attacks and introduced a security procedure known as "Gray Bolt," requiring checks of Palestinian vehicles entering major roads. The measures were extended to the Jenin, Nablus and Jericho sectors amid concerns about further attacks.

Security forces launched extensive searches, engineering operations and . The two attackers belonged to the same extended family and lived near each other. Investigators are expected to arrest people connected to them and examine possible links to other individuals or organizations.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article leaves out that Finance Minister Smotrich ordered the demolition of Palestinian buildings near the scene as a retaliatory move. Without it, a reader believes the response was confined to security measures against the attackers.

How we know

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article describes extensive searches but leaves out that, according to the Red Crescent, a Palestinian man was shot in Dura as the raids began. A reader believes the raids harmed no one.

How we know

The attack came amid heightened tensions surrounding the olive harvest season and Israel's elections. Security officials have been preparing for possible additional attacks ahead of the vote.

As part of the preparations, the IDF reinforced several sectors with additional troops, including paratroopers and soldiers from the Nahal Reconnaissance Unit, and deployed eight additional companies. Security officials are concerned about possible attacks both .

Magen David Adom (MDA) medics and paramedics, working alongside an IDF medical team, treated the wounded and evacuated them to Shaare Zedek and Hadassah Ein Kerem hospitals in Jerusalem.

Tzuriel Edri, an MDA emergency medical technician who arrived at the scene, described the situation: "We arrived at a difficult scene while gunfire was still ongoing. We entered in a bulletproof ambulance and immediately began helping evacuate the wounded."

Ofer Ohana, a well-known local medical responder, filmed the exchange of fire and could be heard shouting: "The terrorist keeps shooting. The exchange of fire between the terrorist and our forces is continuing. We can't get the wounded out! There's been active gunfire for more than 20 minutes!"

The IDF has raised its alert level twice over the past month, first around the anniversary of the October 7 attacks and again this week. On Monday, the IDF spokesperson announced that following a situational assessment conducted by Zamir, the military had decided to suspend leave across all units beginning Thursday.

Need for additional troops for home front missions

The Home Front Command's Ari Battalion (775), the fifth battalion in the Search and Rescue Brigade, was established over the past year to bolster combat forces across operational sectors and provide additional troops for home front missions.

Shortly after its first company completed operational training, the battalion was placed on search-and-rescue alert during Operation Roaring Lion to support operations in northern Israel. The unit subsequently joined other brigade battalions operating under the IDF's Judea and Samaria Division.

The battalion began its first operational deployment this week after several months of specialized training.

The battalion's commander, Lt. Col. L., said Friday: "The battalion's soldiers acted professionally and were deployed effectively throughout the area as part of the effort to protect Israel's citizens. In their very first operational deployment, they demonstrated the importance of their mission and their operational readiness."

He added: "The soldiers maintained a high level of alertness and operational readiness, engaged the threat and acted with determination and speed to neutralize it, preventing harm to civilians and successfully completing their mission. We will continue to act responsibly and remain vigilant as part of the effort to protect Israel's citizens."

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (10)

Ynet runs an unsourced suggestion that an AFP photographer knew of the attack in advance, and its headline turns that expectation into a probe already under way. It states the attackers' Hamas affiliation as fact while its own text says investigators have not established any outside direction, and in its own voice it uses Judea and Samaria and never says occupied West Bank. It writes the planned punitive demolitions of the attackers' family homes as mapping, and it never says that the two who died were soldiers at a checkpoint.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “IDF probes AFP photographer's presence”

    Why this matters
    The headline says the IOF probes the AFP photographer's presence, in the present tense, as something already happening.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the army has opened an investigation into the photographer.
    The context
    The body only says the IOF is expected to examine his account, and it names no source for that expectation. The headline turns an unsourced prediction into an established probe.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The IDF is expected to examine the photographer's account”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Hebron shooting kills 2; AFP photographer documented the gunfight

  2. Smears a named person

    Serious

    “whether he happened to be at the scene or had received advance information about the attack”

    Why this matters
    Ynet raises the possibility that an AFP photographer received advance information about a deadly attack. It gives no basis for the suspicion, no source for it and no response from AFP.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is left suspecting that a working AFP journalist had foreknowledge of the shooting.
    The context
    The article's only facts about the photographer are that he photographed the gunfight and its aftermath. Haaretz published his pictures, credited to AFP, from the northern checkpoint of Hebron, a city exit where a local photographer could plainly be present. The article seeks no comment from AFP.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    An AFP photographer documented the gunfight and its aftermath. The article would say who, if anyone, has questioned his presence, and give AFP's response.

  3. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “within Judea and Samaria and against targets inside Israel”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice, Ynet calls the occupied West Bank Judea and Samaria and sets it against Israel as if it were simply another region.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes Hebron and its villages as Israeli-administered home territory rather than occupied Palestinian land.
    The context
    The attack, the cordon and the raids all took place in the occupied West Bank, whose occupation the ICJ has ruled unlawful. The article never uses the words West Bank or occupied, although other coverage of the same event does.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Security officials are concerned about possible attacks both in the occupied West Bank and inside Israel.

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    “the mapping of the terrorists' homes”

    Why this matters
    Ynet calls it mapping and never says why the homes are being measured.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes this as routine investigative work.
    The context
    Times of Israel reports that the homes were measured ahead of their potential demolition. Ynet itself says both men were married with two children, so those families stand to lose their homes.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli forces measured the attackers' family homes ahead of their possible demolition. Both men were married with two children.

  5. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The article never says that the two people who died were IOF soldiers or that the gunmen opened fire on a checkpoint at a city exit. It stresses a planned attack on civilians, so a reader is left believing civilians were killed.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  6. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “The two Hamas-affiliated terrorists”

    Why this matters
    When Ynet names the two men, it fixes the unsourced Hamas affiliation onto their names as a plain descriptor.
    The impression it gives
    A reader treats the Hamas link as part of their confirmed identity.
    The context
    Haaretz identifies the men by name and residence only. No source in the material confirms any affiliation.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  7. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “eliminated”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice, Ynet says the soldiers eliminated the two men. That is the army's word, not the word killed.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the killings as the removal of a threat rather than as deaths.
    The context
    Elsewhere the article itself says the men were killed, so the plain word was available.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“soldiers flanked the terrorists and killed them”

    Show it in the article

  8. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “barring entry to and exit from both cities”

    Why this matters
    Ynet reports that two whole cities were sealed but quotes only the army chief, the prime minister, a battalion commander and Israeli medics. No resident of Hebron or Halhul is heard.
    The impression it gives
    A reader sees the cordon only as a security measure with no human cost.
    The context
    Hebron alone has about 250,000 residents, and none of them appears in the article.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  9. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article leaves out that Finance Minister Smotrich ordered the demolition of Palestinian buildings near the scene as a retaliatory move. Without it, a reader believes the response was confined to security measures against the attackers.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  10. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article describes extensive searches but leaves out that, according to the Red Crescent, a Palestinian man was shot in Dura as the raids began. A reader believes the raids harmed no one.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

  1. 23 OctAmerican Jews fly to West Bank to help Palestinian olive harvesters amid settler attacks3.0
  2. 23 OctAmerican Jews fly to West Bank to help Palestinian olive harvesters amid settler attacks3.0
  3. 23 OctHelmet camera footage shows Israeli forces battling terrorists near ...7.3
  4. 23 OctFive wounded in shooting attack near Hebron, two terrorists ...6.0
  5. 23 OctFour wounded in shooting attack near Hebron, terrorists eliminated after pursuit7.3

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)

See how 37 outlets covered this story