The New York Times, on Climate, 12 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

A Key Paris Agreement Goal Is Dead. What Now?

No framing issues found.

It was the climate movement’s unifying slogan for the past decade: “Keep 1.5 Alive.” The tagline referred to the central ambition of the 2015 Paris climate agreement, in which almost every country pledged to try to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. Now, just 11 years after the target was set , 1.5 is effectively dead. Scientists now say that without drastic efforts to reduce greenhouse gases, it is very likely that the planet will warm at least 2.6 degrees Celsius, or 4.7 degrees Fahrenheit, by the end of the century.

At COP31 , the United Nations climate summit in Antalya, Turkey, diplomats who spent so long championing the 1.5 degree target lamented the abrupt setback. “The world has no chance of holding to 1.5 degrees,” said Chris Bowen, Australia’s minister for climate change and energy, who is leading the negotiations. Scientists for years have warned that allowing global average temperatures to rise 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels would result in a profoundly more dangerous world.

Extreme heat will become more common and more intense. Storms will become more powerful and destructive. Sea levels will rise. And poor countries will bear the brunt of the damage. That scenario is already playing out around the world. In recent months, wildfires have raged from Canada to Indonesia. The collapse of a glacier in Nepal killed thousands and wiped away towns. Floods and mudslides devastated Brazil. And a European heat wave killed an estimated 50,000 people .

We are having trouble retrieving the article content. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. Already a subscriber? Log in . Want all of The Times? Subscribe .

Read the original article on nytimes.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

The New York Times reports that the Paris Agreement goal of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius is effectively out of reach, quoting Australia's climate minister at COP31 and a scientific projection of at least 2.6 degrees of warming. It ties recent wildfires, floods, a glacier collapse and a deadly European heat wave to the warming scientists warned about. Only the opening of the article came through, and nothing in that text misleads its reader.

What it gets right

  • “That scenario is already playing out around the world.”

    The Times links the wildfires, floods and heat deaths it lists to the warming scientists warned about, so the reader sees these events as consequences of climate change rather than isolated disasters.

  • “Scientists now say that without drastic efforts to reduce greenhouse gases, it is very likely that the planet will warm at least 2.6 degrees Celsius”

    The article attributes the specific warming projection to scientists, keeps the stated likelihood, and makes the result conditional on emissions cuts, so the reader knows that action still changes the outcome.

  • “a European heat wave killed an estimated 50,000 people”

    The Times says plainly that the heat wave killed people and gives the toll as an estimate, rather than writing the deaths out or overstating certainty.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The New York Times

  1. 12 NovStorm Charles Pummels Portugal and Disrupts Flights0.0
  2. 12 NovA Concerned Californian’s Guide to El Niño0.0
  3. 12 NovMalawi Lacks Money to Fund its El Niño Plans0.0
  4. 11 Nov‘Fight Harder,’ U.N. Chief António Guterres Implores, Rousing Climate Ambassadors at COP310.0
  5. 11 NovThe United States Is Skipping COP31 in Turkey0.0

Everything we scored from The New York Times