The Guardian, on UK Politics, 28 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Bafta trustees may have breached charity and company law by accepting free tickets for guests at the organisation’s awards ceremonies, the chair of its membership council has claimed. Michael Pritchett told members at Bafta’s annual general meeting that legal advice obtained at his own expense suggested offences could have been committed by trustees who approved the charity’s accounts, which stated that no trustees had received remuneration or benefits.

“I did not go looking for what I found,” Pritchett said. “I found it doing the job that you gave me.” He claimed trustees had received complimentary tickets for themselves and a guest at the film, television and games awards, potentially for as long as 20 years. The guest tickets were top-table seats, he said, with a second ticket at the film awards selling for £2,000. Tourette syndrome campaigner John Davidson to watch Bafta Scotland awards in separate ‘relaxed’ space Read more Bafta’s governing document states that trustees may not receive remuneration or other benefits from the academy.

Pritchett said the charity’s 2024 and 2025 accounts stated that no trustees had received remuneration for their services, while its public register said trustees received no remuneration, payments or benefits. “Council advises that offences under the Charities Act and Companies Act are likely to have been committed by the trustees who approved those accounts,” he said. “I really wish I didn’t have to tell you this.” Pritchett also raised questions about possible tax liabilities, saying benefits of this kind were likely to have been taxable since 2016, with national insurance potentially payable by Bafta.

He said he could not establish whether the arrangements had been reported to the relevant authorities. Bafta’s outgoing chair, Sara Putt, said the board had decided to end the practice of giving trustees a guest ticket to awards ceremonies in 2025, after a recommendation from its governance committee. “The separate guest ticket and accounting matters are being examined by an independent review group,” Putt said, adding that the board would update members in due course.

Bafta trustees are volunteers, and it is understood they are invited to awards ceremonies in a working capacity, hosting tables and acting as ambassadors for the academy. It is also understood that guest tickets were a longstanding custom dating back to a time when demand for awards tickets was lower. Pritchett also criticised the refusal of a senior Bafta executive to provide records of who had received complimentary tickets, despite the committee’s terms of reference stating it could seek any information required from academy employees.

“The records belong to the charity that you subscribe to,” he told members, noting that they had paid £4.7m in membership fees the previous year. Twelve-year-old wins Australian slam competition prize with poem about ChatGPT: ‘It’s totally unnecessary’ Read more Pritchett called on trustees to pay any taxes found to be due, repay any money owed and correct the accounts. Putt responded: “If we were told we had to pay those taxes, we would absolutely pay those taxes.”

Putt said the legal advice obtained by Pritchett and fellow committee member Sara Curran was based on the information available to them, while Bafta’s own legal counsel had access to a fuller picture of the charity’s circumstances. A Bafta spokesperson said: “Trustees of Bafta are invited to attend events in a working capacity, representing the academy in an ambassadorial role, and prior to 2025 they could also bring a ‘plus one’ guest to accompany them.

“In 2025 Bafta decided to review its guest tickets arrangements and discontinued the longstanding custom and practice of trustees inviting a plus one. The board has since established an independent review group to consider the historic guest ticket arrangement – the review is under way.” Explore more on these topics Awards and prizes Baftas Charities Voluntary sector news Share Reuse this content

Read the original article on theguardian.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Guardian reports a claim by Michael Pritchett, chair of Bafta's membership council, that trustees may have broken charity and company law by taking free guest tickets. It also quotes replies from Bafta's chair and a spokesperson. The Guardian's headline drops the attribution the body gives, so readers take the possibility as the paper's own judgement rather than Pritchett's claim. Otherwise the article attributes each claim to the person who makes it.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “Bafta trustees may have broken charity law by accepting free guest tickets”

    Why this matters
    The headline states that trustees "may have broken charity law" with no name attached, as if the possibility were the Guardian's own finding.
    The impression it gives
    A reader of the headline alone may think the Guardian, or some official body, has judged that a breach is possible.
    The context
    The body makes clear this is a claim by one man, Michael Pritchett, based on legal advice he paid for, and Bafta disputes that advice's basis. The "may have" hedge softens the problem, but the attribution is still missing.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the chair of its membership council has claimed”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Bafta's own legal counsel had access to a fuller picture”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “the chair of its membership council has claimed”

    The opening sentence attributes the allegation to a named person instead of presenting it as established.

  • “Bafta's own legal counsel had access to a fuller picture of the charity's circumstances”

    The article gives Bafta's chair a direct answer to the legal advice behind the allegation, so readers see it is contested.

  • “the board had decided to end the practice of giving trustees a guest ticket to awards ceremonies in 2025”

    It reports the organisation's own action on the practice, giving readers the accused side's account.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Guardian

  1. 28 OctVolunteer, 78, says Reform official likened her to Nazi collaborator for teaching asylum seekers English0.0
  2. 28 OctPlan for multibillion-pound Sizewell nuclear plant a ‘terrible deal’ for UK taxpayers, MPs say0.0
  3. 27 OctWhy won’t MPs tax the rich? We asked them – and their answers gave us hope0.0
  4. 27 OctUK officials discussing options including free movement with EU ahead of summit3.0
  5. 27 OctUK government met 137 businesses over AI datacentres – but no environmental groups 3.0

Everything we scored from The Guardian