Ynet News (English), on West Bank, 4 November 2026

8.7out of 10Severe

IDF caught off guard as Jewish families move into 8 West Bank homes near Jericho

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

The IDF has criticized the uncoordinated arrival of Jewish families at homes near the West Bank city of Jericho, saying Wednesday's move caught both the military and Division 96, which operates in the Jericho area and along Israel's eastern border, by surprise. The army was forced to divert approximately three platoons of combat troops to secure the new residents, pulling them away from other security assignments, including efforts to prevent smuggling along the Jordanian border and additional routine security operations.

Earlier Wednesday, ynet learned that Jewish families had moved into eight homes in - near the Palestinian city of Jericho following a covert operation to purchase the properties. The Nachala settlement movement led the initiative, with the backing and assistance of the Binyamin Regional Council. Security teams prepared for the operation, which was kept secret until the families entered the homes.

The families used a model familiar from Hebron, where Jewish groups have purchased homes from Palestinians and moved into them quickly without coordinating with security authorities. In previous cases in Hebron, the IDF would remove the new occupants until the purchase documents had been verified. In this case, however, the properties are located in Area C, which is under Israeli civilian and security control, and .

Nevertheless, the homes are situated immediately adjacent to Area A, which is under the Palestinian Authority's civilian and security control, . The military therefore deployed troops to the area, operating on the understanding that the new residents must be protected. In the coming days, the IDF will seek to develop a security arrangement for the families who have moved into the homes.

Earlier Wednesday, responding to questions about the developments near Jericho, the IDF Spokesperson's Unit said: "The entry into the homes was carried out without prior coordination with the IDF and without authorization. The purchase process and its resulting security implications are currently being examined by the relevant authorities. IDF forces are present in the area."

Meanwhile, it emerged Wednesday that President Isaac Herzog sent a strongly worded warning letter last month to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Israel Katz and National Security Council chief Shmuel Ben Ezra, expressing alarm over the growing threat posed by nationalist violence in the West Bank.

The letter, dated October 8, warned of a potential national and security catastrophe. It was also circulated in recent days to senior IDF General Staff officers, the attorney general and the foreign minister.

"I feel a profound and urgent duty to write to you from the depths of my heart and warn you about the situation I have encountered, because we are one step away from disaster," Herzog wrote. "The very possibility of firearms being used against Israeli civilians, or, God forbid, a deadly attack against members of the security forces, carries the potential for an explosive outcome. An outcome that could lead to civil war."

IDF's 98th Division prepares to leave the West Bank

At the same time, after nearly 40 days of operations, the IDF's 98th Division is expected to conclude its deployment in the Judea and Etzion sectors in the coming days.

In September, in an unusual move, IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir ordered additional forces into the West Bank in response to a complex security situation. The deployment came amid tensions surrounding the Jewish holidays and elections, a series of attacks carried out by lone assailants and .

Zamir deployed the 98th Division primarily to strengthen command and control over forces operating in the Etzion and Judea sectors and maintain operational control of the area. With the tense election period now over, the division is expected to complete its mission, and responsibility for the sectors will return to the IDF's West Bank Division, as before.

However, the 98th Division is being withdrawn despite the absence of an effective solution to nationalist violence, including violence committed by Jewish extremists. The military appears to have been particularly concerned about the convergence of security threats during the recent period of heightened tensions, and with that period now over, the decision was made to withdraw the additional division from the West Bank.

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Ynet tells the arrival of settler families, organised by the Nachala settlement movement, in eight homes near Jericho as a coordination problem for the army that was caught off guard. It describes Area C only as under Israeli control and calls the land state land, and it never says the West Bank is occupied or that settlements there are illegal. It also uses the vague label nationalist violence for attacks it elsewhere links to Jewish extremists.

  1. Hedges the documented record

    Severe

    “Area C - under full Israeli civil and military control”

    Why this matters
    Ynet describes the land where the settlers moved in only as "under full Israeli civil and military control". This is the one place the article explains the territory's status.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes Area C to be ordinary Israeli-administered land where the only question is whether the army gave approval.
    The context
    The International Court of Justice has found Israel's occupation of the West Bank unlawful and its settlements there illegal. The article never uses the words occupied, occupation, illegal or unlawful, although the whole story is a settlement movement taking homes beside a Palestinian city.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “occupied”, “occupation”, “illegal” and “unlawful”.

    Show it in the article

    “on state land rather than privately owned Palestinian property”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice, Ynet sets "state land" against "privately owned Palestinian property" to show how this case differs from Hebron.
    The impression it gives
    A reader concludes that the move is on legitimate land, so it is less of a problem than a takeover of Palestinian homes.
    The context
    Settlements in the occupied West Bank are illegal under international law whatever Israel calls the land. Ynet adopts Israel's designation as plain fact and treats the land status as settling the matter.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“The Nachala settlement movement led the initiative”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Settler families organised by the Nachala settlement movement moved into eight homes in Area C of the occupied West Bank near Jericho. The International Court of Justice has found Israel's settlements there illegal.

  2. Tells the event as something else

    Serious

    “without approval”

    Why this matters
    The headline makes "without approval" the problem with the move and makes the army being "caught off guard" the story.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the event to be a paperwork and coordination failure between Israeli families and their own army.
    The context
    The body shows a settlement movement running a secret operation, backed by a regional council, to plant settlers beside a Palestinian city in occupied territory. Its illegality does not depend on army approval.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The Nachala settlement movement led the initiative, with the backing and assistance of the Binyamin Regional Council”
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “creating potential security risks for the new residents”

    Why this matters
    Ynet presents the Palestinian-run area next door only as a source of "security risks" to the settlers.
    The impression it gives
    A reader sees the settlers as the people in danger and the Palestinians of Jericho only as a threat to be guarded against.
    The context
    Settlers moved by covert operation into homes beside a Palestinian city, and armed troops were sent to protect them. The article never asks what this means for the Palestinians living there.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“divert approximately three platoons of combat troops to secure the new residents”
    • On the recordWest Bank settlers operate armed by the Israeli state and accompanied by the Israeli army.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    A settlement movement covertly moved settler families into eight homes beside the Palestinian city of Jericho in the occupied West Bank, and Israeli occupation forces sent troops to guard them.

  3. Softens settler violence

    Minor

    “an increase in nationalist violence”

    Why this matters
    Ynet repeats the faceless label and sets it beside holiday "tensions" and attacks by "lone assailants" as one of several causes of a troop deployment.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes settler attacks to be one more security headache alongside Palestinian attacks, with no one in particular responsible.
    The context
    Ynet's own S27 links this violence to Jewish extremists. The article says nothing of who was attacked, and it treats the withdrawal of troops as an army scheduling question.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the absence of an effective solution to nationalist violence”
    • On the recordWest Bank settlers operate armed by the Israeli state and accompanied by the Israeli army.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

  1. 3 Nov‘The film distorts reality’: IDF legal chief attacks NAZA, condemns West Bank violence8.0
  2. 2 NovBurning tires, roadblocks and violence: 18 Jewish extremists arrested in West Bank outpost evacuation3.0
  3. 2 NovIDF Announces End of Hebron Operation - Ynet News7.3
  4. 28 OctIDF expands West Bank operations with counterterrorism raids as Hebron offensive continues9.4
  5. 27 OctIDF launches operation to demolish terrorist memorials in West Bank7.3

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)