Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on Lebanon, 31 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Hezbollah admits explosives ownership as Lebanon charges 13

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

A Lebanese military court has charged 13 people in connection with a shipment of explosives belonging to , the Associated Press reported. The shipment was intercepted by security forces earlier this month. According to the Associated Press , citing Lebanon's state-run National News Agency , the charges were filed on Friday after authorities discovered 780 kilograms (1,720 pounds) of explosives aboard a truck traveling on the main highway connecting Beirut with the Bekaa Valley.

Judicial officials said the shipment included approximately 250 kilograms of TNT and another 250 kilograms of C-4 plastic explosives. Two suspects arrested when the truck was intercepted remain in custody, while 11 others have been charged in absentia. The identities of five defendants remain unknown, with authorities listing them only by their aliases. The charges include offenses against Lebanon's internal security, unlawful possession of weapons and explosives, and participation in illegal organizations accused of undermining state authority.

The charges were brought by Judge Claude Ghanem, the government commissioner to Lebanon's Military Court. Hezbollah has acknowledged that the explosives belong to the organization, claiming they were intended for operations against Israeli forces in southern Lebanon. has demanded that Lebanese authorities return the seized materials and release the two detained suspects. The seizure has sparked controversy in Lebanon, with critics accusing Hezbollah of potentially planning attacks against its domestic political opponents.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article says Hezbollah meant the explosives for operations against "Israeli forces in southern Lebanon". It never says that Israel occupies large parts of southern Lebanon. A reader is left without the fact that every other outlet gives about the setting of this seizure.

How we know

However, no evidence establishing such a plan has been publicly presented. In March, Lebanese authorities declared Hezbollah's military activities illegal following renewed hostilities with Israel. Hezbollah has rejected the government's decision and continues to oppose efforts to disarm its military wing.

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Arutz Sheva reports the charges against 13 people accurately, attributes Hezbollah's stated purpose to Hezbollah, and tells the reader that no evidence of a domestic assassination plot has been presented. In its own voice it twice calls Hezbollah a terrorist organisation and never mentions that Hezbollah sits in Lebanon's parliament. It refers to "Israeli forces in southern Lebanon" without saying that Israel occupies that territory.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “the Hezbollah terrorist organization”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice, in the opening sentence, the outlet attaches "terrorist organization" to Hezbollah as a fixed descriptor, with no attribution to any government's designation.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes Hezbollah to be only a terrorist body, not a Lebanese political movement with elected members, before the facts of the case are even set out.
    The context
    Hezbollah has members in Lebanon's parliament. Al Jazeera quotes a Hezbollah MP on these very charges, and The Independent describes it more neutrally as a militant group. The article never mentions Hezbollah's parliamentary presence.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “The terrorist group”

    Why this matters
    The outlet repeats the label as a plain substitute for Hezbollah's name, at the point where it reports the group's demand to the Lebanese state.
    The impression it gives
    A reader sees a legal dispute between a Lebanese party and its own government framed as a terrorist group making demands of a state.
    The context
    Other reports of the same demand name Hezbollah or call it a group without the label. Al Jazeera reports the case through an elected Hezbollah MP who says those charged confronted Israel rather than undermining the state.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article says Hezbollah meant the explosives for operations against "Israeli forces in southern Lebanon". It never says that Israel occupies large parts of southern Lebanon. A reader is left without the fact that every other outlet gives about the setting of this seizure.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “However, no evidence establishing such a plan has been publicly presented.”

    The outlet does not let critics' accusations of a domestic assassination plot stand as fact. It tells the reader plainly that nothing has been shown, as Al Jazeera also reports.

  • “claiming they were intended for operations against Israeli forces in southern Lebanon”

    Hezbollah's stated purpose for the explosives is clearly attributed to Hezbollah rather than asserted in the outlet's voice.

  • “The charges were brought by Judge Claude Ghanem, the government commissioner to Lebanon's Military Court.”

    The article names the official responsible for the charges and his role, so the reader knows who acted.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 29 OctHezbollah leader: Israel's election won't change our fight against them6.0
  2. 23 OctConcern in Lebanon: Hezbollah may attempt to destabilize the government3.0
  3. 22 OctIsrael sanctions Lebanese fuel company for supplying fuel to Hezbollah8.2
  4. 21 OctIsraeli robot APC goes rogue, IDF airstrikes nearly spark diplomatic crisis7.3
  5. 21 OctLebanese judge summons Hezbollah officials over seized explosives shipment8.2

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News