The Jewish Chronicle, on UK Politics, 4 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

, warns former minister

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

will “stoke” antisemitism, a former minister has said, as a vote criticising the measures was passed by peers. Baroness Altmann said the West was “being played” as she quoted the late Lord Sacks, former chief rabbi, who said human rights was used as a cover for antisemitism. It came as the package of sanctions was heavily rebuked by opposition peers for disproportionately targeting Israel. Foreign Office minister Lord [Stewart] Wood said the UK had also announced sanctions last week against fighters on both sides of the Sudanese civil war.

In September, Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband announced sanctions on West Bank settlements which banned imports from affected areas. Lord Wood said the measures would “stand up for British values” and respond to human rights abuses. The law changes were being debated in the House of Lords on Wednesday. A motion to “regret” them was passed by 94 votes to 90. Lady Altmann, who was pensions minister under David Cameron and Theresa May, said: “I’m afraid that the West is being played and this statutory instrument will simply stoke further Jew-hatred.

“It will not promote or help in any way those who want the two-state solution, the Palestinians who lose their jobs [or] who are working alongside Israelis. “I just beg the government to understand the danger of singling out Israel for special punishment when so many of us who are Jewish citizens of this country are trying to warn of the dangers that this entails.” The sanctions unveiled by Miliband will target companies and individuals providing services such as financing and construction for the illegal settlements.

There will also be a ban on advertising in the UK of illegal settlements. Conservative former local government secretary Lord Pickles said the financial restrictions introduced by sanctions would introduce part of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign against Israel by the “back door”. Tory peer Lord Polak, who is the honorary president of the Conservative Friends of Israel group, said it could stop estate agents advertising homes in Jewish neighbourhoods of Jerusalem.

“Britain should be building bridges in the Middle East, not burning them,” he said. His party colleague Lord Leigh of Hurley, who tabled a “regret motion” against the sanctions, said they were motivated by an attempt to “satisfy local, domestic political objectives by the foreign secretary and his government”. Lord Leigh said: “The government’s relentless and unequal focus on measures against Israel has left many Jews in this country fearful.

“There were 1,962 antisemitic incidents in the last six months in the UK. This does nothing to reduce the tensions.” In September, Miliband told MPs the “new approach” was necessary because plans for the E1 development in the West Bank would render a two-state solution “unviable” by “cutting through the heart of Palestine”. The foreign secretary said more settlements had been approved under the four years of Benjamin Netanyahu’s government than in the previous 20 years, and settler terrorism in the West Bank was “rampant”.

He said the government “agreed” there is ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in the West Bank by “settler terrorists”. Miliband said the Israeli government had turned a “blind eye” to it, or even encouraged it. Responding in the House of Lords, Lord Wood said: “The expansion of the global human rights and international humanitarian law regime shows how the UK is taking bold action to stand up for British values around the world. “We continue to lead internationally on sanctions implementation, and this amended global human rights and international humanitarian law regime will give the UK a powerful tool to respond to human rights abuses and international humanitarian law violations across the world.”

Read the original article on thejc.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Jewish Chronicle calls the measures "sanctions on Israel" in its headline and opening line, though its own body says they target companies serving the illegal West Bank settlements and settlement advertising. The headline also turns Baroness Altmann's prediction that the measures "will stoke" Jew-hatred into a present-tense quotation she did not say. The rest of the report attributes the peers' claims and gives the government's reasons.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “UK sanctions on Israel”

    Why this matters
    The headline calls the measures "UK sanctions on Israel" in the outlet's own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the UK has sanctioned the State of Israel as a whole.
    The context
    The body says the sanctions target companies and individuals that finance or build the illegal settlements, and ban settlement imports and advertising. The ICJ holds the settlements illegal and the occupation unlawful. The claim that the package singles out Israel belongs to the opposition peers, and the headline adopts their description.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“target companies and individuals providing services such as financing and construction for the illegal settlements”
    • Elsewhere in the article“announced sanctions on West Bank settlements which banned imports from affected areas”
    • Elsewhere in the article“a ban on advertising in the UK of illegal settlements”
    • On the recordThe ICJ's July 2024 advisory opinion holds Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful and the Israeli settlements illegal.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “‘stoking antisemitism’”

    Why this matters
    The headline puts "stoking antisemitism" in quotation marks, in the present tense.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Baroness Altmann said the sanctions are already stoking antisemitism, in those words.
    The context
    She predicted the instrument "will simply stoke further Jew-hatred". The headline turns her forecast into a current effect and quotes words she did not use.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“this statutory instrument will simply stoke further Jew-hatred”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Sanctions on illegal West Bank settlements will 'stoke Jew-hatred', former minister claims

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “The government’s sanctions on Israel”

    Why this matters
    The opening line repeats "sanctions on Israel" in the outlet's own voice as a plain description of the measures.
    The impression it gives
    A reader starts the report believing the measures target Israel itself, which is the opposition peers' case against them.
    The context
    The outlet's own later sentences describe sanctions on settlements, settlement imports and settlement advertising. That the package targets Israel is the peers' framing, as S3 attributes it.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“heavily rebuked by opposition peers for disproportionately targeting Israel”
    • Elsewhere in the article“financing and construction for the illegal settlements”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jewish Chronicle

  1. 4 NovLabour MPs condemn legal challenge to school antisemitism review over IHRA definition3.0
  2. 4 Nov‘Disgusting sectarianism’: Birmingham council slammed for anti-Israel divestment vote8.0
  3. 4 NovExclusive: BBC faces new claim of Jewish staff ‘being investigated’3.0
  4. 3 NovMajor review of antisemitism in education faces legal challenge over IHRA recommendation3.0
  5. 3 Nov‘Zionism is racism’ motion damaged Greens electoral ambitions, admits former party leader3.0

Everything we scored from The Jewish Chronicle