The Jewish Chronicle, on UK Politics, 3 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

‘Zionism is racism’

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

A former leader of the Green Party has reportedly admitted that the controversial “Zionism is racism” motion passed at its conference last month has limited its electoral ambitions. According to The Times, Carla Denyer, who served as the party’s co-leader alongside Adrian Ramsay between 2021 and 2025 and is still its MP for Bristol Central, told an internal meeting that the motion, which is now official party policy, had created a “difficult environment” for it to win votes.

“Advancing this motion probably does put a hard cap on our electoral ambitions as a party, reducing our membership, reducing our number of councillors, and funding,” she is reported to have said. And, while she reportedly agreed with sections of the motion calling for stricter sanctions against Israel and the deproscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist group, she spoke out against .

“There were other things in the motion that I couldn’t support including, in particular, the Green Party of England and Wales appointing itself as the decider of what the constitutional settlement [should be],” she said. “We believe in self-determination, and so I really don’t think it’s for a party in England to say, ‘actually, we know better than people who live there’. “And I think doing so is in danger of being next-generation imperialism.

So there are parts of that motion that I support, [and parts I] didn’t think were constructive.” Party leader Zack Polanski, who was previously Denyer and Ramsay’s deputy, has also taken issue with that section of the motion, saying he would look to amend it at the next opportunity – 2027 under party rules. However, he told the BBC last month that he would not seek to overturn the motion and that he agreed with the contention that Zionism in its practical application was “underpinned by a racist ideology”.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never gives the motion's own definition of Zionism. That definition is a political ideology that maintains an ethnonationalist Jewish state to the exclusion or domination of the non-Jewish population. Without it, a reader has no way to judge what the party actually declared racist.

How we know

It comes after Labour’s National Executive Committee (NEC) confirmed on Monday that the party would end power-sharing agreements with the Greens on 11 local councils across the country. The two parties have collaborated at a council level in several areas where neither of them could form their own majority administration since last May’s local elections. But the NEC ordered councillors to dissolve such coalitions unless their Green counterparts had disavowed the motion.

“Labour has been clear from the start that the ‘Zionism is Racism’ policy crosses a line, and we cannot work with any party that supports it – at any level of government,” said Labour Party Chairwoman Bridget Phillipson. In response, Polanski accused Labour of “trying to bully everyone into defending genocide” and “putting Israel far above serving our local communities”. Asked about Denyer’s reported comments, a Green Party spokesperson said: “This short extract taken from a longer, private, members meeting makes it clear that Carla Denyer was not talking about a lasting impact on overall electoral success, but discussing as part of the ebb and flow of debates that take part in political parties all the time.”

Read the original article on thejc.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Jewish Chronicle's headline says the motion 'damaged' the Greens, while its own body reports only that Denyer 'reportedly' said it would 'probably' cap the party's ambitions, at a private meeting. The paper sums up the single-state clause as a Palestinian state to 'replace Israel' without the words 'democratic' and 'equal rights for all', and never gives the motion's own definition of Zionism.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “motion damaged Greens electoral ambitions, admits former party leader”

    Why this matters
    The headline states in the past tense, as the paper's own fact, that the motion "damaged" the Greens' electoral ambitions, and calls Denyer's remark an admission.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the damage has happened and that a former leader has confirmed it on the record.
    The context
    The body says she "reportedly" said this, citing The Times, at a private internal meeting. Her quoted words are a forecast hedged with "probably". The Green Party disputes that she was talking about a lasting impact. The headline keeps none of this.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“has reportedly admitted”
    • Elsewhere in the article“probably does put a hard cap on our electoral ambitions”
    • Elsewhere in the article“was not talking about a lasting impact on overall electoral success”

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    “the section which called for a single Palestinian state to replace Israel”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the paper sums up the single-state clause as a call for a Palestinian state "to replace Israel". It leaves out that the clause calls for a democratic state with equal rights for all.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the motion simply calls for Israel to be swapped for a Palestinian state, with nothing said about the rights of the people who live there.
    The context
    The clause calls for a single democratic Palestinian state with equal rights for all and the right of return. Our editorial found that most reports cut the clause before those words, and this paraphrase does the same.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never gives the motion's own definition of Zionism. That definition is a political ideology that maintains an ethnonationalist Jewish state to the exclusion or domination of the non-Jewish population. Without it, a reader has no way to judge what the party actually declared racist.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Our analysisFifteen news reports on the Greens' Zionism vote gave the Israeli state 773 words and Palestinians 98. Thirteen quoted no Palestinian at all.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jewish Chronicle

  1. 3 NovMajor review of antisemitism in education faces legal challenge over IHRA recommendation3.0
  2. 2 NovJLC and CST permitted to intervene in Palestine Action proscription appeal8.0
  3. 2 NovDeputy resigns after suspension threat over Yachad letter0.0
  4. 2 NovLabour pulls out of 11 local coalitions with Greens over ‘Zionism is racism’ motion3.0
  5. 2 NovExclusive: ‘We can’t ignore antisemitism on the Left,’ admits Business Secretary3.0

Everything we scored from The Jewish Chronicle