The Jewish Chronicle, on UK Politics, 2 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Labour pulls out of 11 local coalitions with Greens over ‘Zionism is racism’ motion

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Labour has confirmed that it will end 11 power-sharing agreements with the Greens on local councils across the country after Zack Polanski’s party . The two parties have collaborated at a council level in several areas where neither of them could form their own majority administration since last May’s local elections. However, in a decision on Monday, Labour’s National Executive Committee (NEC) instructed Labour councillors to withdraw from such coalitions where their Green counterparts had refused to disavow the policy, which was passed at the Green Party Conference last month.

“Labour has been clear from the start that the ‘Zionism is Racism’ policy crosses a line, and ,” said Labour Party Chairwoman Bridget Phillipson. The decision means that the following councils will see the power-sharing deals end: Arun District Council Derbyshire Dales District Council Havant Borough Council Lewes District Council Runnymede Borough Council (though Labour said its cooperation with the Greens had already ended) Sheffield City Council Stafford Borough Council Warwick District Council Wealden District Council West Devon Borough Council West Suffolk Council However, the agreements will remain in place in Broadland, Monmouthshire, North Somerset, Rother, West Oxfordshire and West Sussex, where Green councillors have, according to Labour, sufficiently distanced themselves from the policy.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article lists Lewes among the councils where, it says in S3, Green councillors had refused to disavow the policy. It never says that the Lewes Green group had written to Labour saying it did not agree with the national motion, that the deal ended by mutual agreement, or that the Labour leader there had resigned from the party. A reader wrongly believes the Lewes Greens refused to distance themselves from the motion.

How we know

On Coventry City Council, where there was no formal arrangement in place, no formal arrangement will be made in future, Labour added. The conference motion has prompted backlash from Jewish Greens and politicians from across the political spectrum. For instance, over the weekend Drew Creek, the Mayor of Newquay and leader of the Cornwall Greens, announced he would defect to Labour, saying: “The motion passed at the Green Party’s national conference this month, and the direction the party has taken since, is something I cannot support or stand behind.”

But Polanski has confirmed that he will not seek to overturn the policy, adding that, while the motion was “imperfect,” he shared the view that Zionism is “underpinned by racist ideology”. Instead, he said he would seek to amend it at the next opportunity, which will be in 2027 under party rules, to say “that Israelis and Palestinians should decide that future for themselves” .

Read the original article on thejc.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Jewish Chronicle reports Labour's withdrawal from 11 council deals with the Greens accurately and attributes Labour's position to Bridget Phillipson. It gives Labour, a defector and the motion's critics the space but never prints the Green Party's reply to the decision. It sums up the motion as advocating a single Palestinian state without its own definition of Zionism or its clause on equal rights for all. It also lists Lewes among councils whose Greens refused to disavow the policy, when the Lewes Greens had told Labour they disagreed with it.

  1. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “we cannot work with any party that supports it – at any level of government”

    Why this matters
    The Chronicle gives Labour's chair the decision's justification in full, and no Green Party statement on the decision appears anywhere in the article.
    The impression it gives
    A reader sees only Labour's case for collapsing the councils and has no idea how the Greens responded.
    The context
    The Greens said they were hugely disappointed, that residents would face worse outcomes, and that they would not take lectures from a Labour government that supplies arms to Israel.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    “rather than its current position of advocating for a single Palestinian state”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Chronicle sums up the motion's position as "a single Palestinian state" and stops there.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the motion to call for a Palestinian state in place of Israel with nothing said about the rights of those living in it.
    The context
    The motion calls for a single democratic state with equal rights for all and the right of return.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “passed a motion declaring Zionism to be a form of racism”

    Why this matters
    The Chronicle describes the motion only by its title and never gives the definition of Zionism the motion uses.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is left to assume the motion condemns any belief in a Jewish homeland, the definition the motion's critics use.
    The context
    The motion defines Zionism as an ideology maintaining an ethnonationalist state to the exclusion or domination of the non-Jewish population and says it is not aimed at anyone's religion or ethnicity.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article lists Lewes among the councils where, it says in S3, Green councillors had refused to disavow the policy. It never says that the Lewes Green group had written to Labour saying it did not agree with the national motion, that the deal ended by mutual agreement, or that the Labour leader there had resigned from the party. A reader wrongly believes the Lewes Greens refused to distance themselves from the motion.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “while the motion was “imperfect,” he shared the view that Zionism is “underpinned by racist ideology””

    The Chronicle reports Polanski's position in his own quoted words rather than paraphrasing it into a charge.

How other outlets reported it

Our analysisFifteen news reports on the Greens' Zionism vote gave the Israeli state 773 words and Palestinians 98. Thirteen quoted no Palestinian at all.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jewish Chronicle

  1. 2 NovExclusive: ‘We can’t ignore antisemitism on the Left,’ admits Business Secretary3.0
  2. 2 Nov‘I don’t really feel safe telling people I’m Jewish’: The British doctors planning to make aliyah0.0
  3. 2 NovLove, work, family and safety: Why British Jews are making aliyah0.0
  4. 1 NovGreen mayor quits party over ‘Zionism is racism’ motion: ‘It crossed a line’8.0
  5. 31 OctA Jewish community must have room for those without children0.0

Everything we scored from The Jewish Chronicle