Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on UK Politics, 14 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

UK PM rules out deal with Greens over 'antisemitic' anti-Zionist policy

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

British Prime Minister Andy Burnham announced Wednesday that the Labour Party would not enter into a partnership with the Green Party as long as it maintains its recently adopted policy declaring Zionism a form of racism. Speaking during Prime Minister's Questions in the House of Commons, Burnham strongly condemned the motion, which Green Party members approved at their annual conference earlier this month. The issue was raised by Conservative MP Dame Harriett Baldwin, who challenged the prime minister to clarify whether Labour would cooperate with the Greens following the controversial vote.

"Can I condemn the motion that was passed unequivocally? It is wrong, it is antisemitic, and this side of the House will have nothing to do with it," Burnham responded. "We will always take the right response when it comes to any partnerships we have with other parties. We cannot support a partnership with a party that holds the position that has recently been adopted." The Green Party adopted the motion on October 4 by a vote of 1,022 to 813.

The resolution characterizes Zionism as a racist ideology and . , including four of its five MPs and former leader Caroline Lucas. Green Party leader Zack Polanski, who did not participate in the vote, acknowledged that the wording of the resolution was "imperfect" and said he had sought amendments.

However, he defended its underlying arguments and rejected accusations that criticism of Zionism was inherently antisemitic. Responding to Burnham's remarks, Polanski said: "I'm the only Jewish leader of a political party. I'm a victim of antisemitism every day and I've made it clear Jewish people are welcome in my party." He accused the prime minister of supporting Israel's military campaign in Gaza and argued that conflating opposition to Israeli policies with antisemitism was dangerous.

The controversy has also prompted questions about the Green Party's internal decision-making procedures. Green MP Ellie Chowns criticized the fact that a major policy change could be approved by such a small proportion of the party's approximately 230,000 members. The resolution has become official Green Party policy, although it is not guaranteed to appear in the party's manifesto at the next general election. Labour currently shares power with the Greens on several local councils, including Sheffield, Lewes, and Warwick, and participates in broader coalitions involving the Greens elsewhere.

A Downing Street spokesman declined to clarify whether Burnham's rejection of a partnership would also apply to existing local government arrangements.

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Arutz Sheva reports Andy Burnham's refusal at PMQs to partner with the Greens, attributes the antisemitism charge to him and gives Zack Polanski room to reply. It cuts the motion's call for a democratic state with equal rights for all down to a bare 'single Palestinian state'. It gives the motion's critics a voice while no backer of the motion speaks.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    “supports the establishment of a single Palestinian state throughout the territory of historic Palestine”

    Why this matters
    The outlet describes what the motion backs as 'a single Palestinian state' and stops there.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the motion to call for a state for Palestinians alone, with no place or rights for Jews or anyone else living there.
    The context
    The motion backs 'a single democratic Palestinian State' with 'equal rights for all'. The article drops both words, which change what the motion asks for.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “The decision sparked criticism from Jewish organizations and senior figures within the Green Party”

    Why this matters
    The outlet lists unnamed 'Jewish organizations' and Green critics against the motion, and quotes no one who backed it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking the motion's critics speak for Jewish people as a whole and that no one defends the motion on its own terms.
    The context
    The motion passed 1,022 to 813, yet its author, Lubna Speitan, and its Jewish and Palestinian supporters go unnamed and unquoted. Polanski, who did not vote, is the only defender given space.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “It is wrong, it is antisemitic, and this side of the House will have nothing to do with it," Burnham responded.”

    The antisemitism charge is quoted and attributed to Burnham, not stated in the outlet's own voice, and the headline keeps it in quotation marks.

  • “The Green Party adopted the motion on October 4 by a vote of 1,022 to 813.”

    It gives the date and the exact vote, which match the record.

  • “Responding to Burnham's remarks, Polanski said: "I'm the only Jewish leader of a political party.”

    The party accused of antisemitism gets to answer the charge in its leader's own words.

How other outlets reported it

Our analysisThe papers wrote 447 articles on the Greens' Zionism vote. Israel, pro-Israel groups and the Chief Rabbi got 12,133 words. Palestinians got 3,173.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News