New York Post, on Iran, 3 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

US forces hit Iran's Qeshm Island as part of a series of secret strikes: report

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

US forces reportedly launched a secret attack on Iran’s Qeshm Island Monday, the latest in a series of small-scale strikes . The assault was one of several the US secretly carried out against Iran in recent weeks, which have been described by US officials as defensive in nature, according to the Wall Street Journal . The US reportedly conducted a strike on Qeshm Island. Peter Hermes Furian – stock.adobe.com Monday’s target, Qeshm Island, .

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The Post never says what the strike hit. Other outlets reported, citing a US official, that a US fighter jet destroyed a surface-to-air missile launcher after the IRGC fired an anti-aircraft missile. Without this, and with the unsourced line on ballistic missile storage, a reader believes the strike targeted ballistic missile stores.

How we know

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The Post gives only the US account of the strike. It leaves out Iranian media reports of five explosions and aircraft overhead, the IRGC's statement that it downed two US drones south of Qeshm, and that Iran had not commented publicly.

How we know

It is also the site of a naval base and a desalination plant. The island, located at the mouth of the Strait of Hormuz, has been repeatedly targeted by US forces since the start of the war with Iran. The wave of recent strikes has been kept under wraps so as not to signal an intention of resuming major combat operations, a US official told the Journal. Explore More Two children among 5 rescued after being stranded in Pacific Ocean for three months: officials Study claims long-held theory of origin of life on earth could be completely wrong Toronto home invasion suspect wounded during break-in was allowed to walk free from hospital: cops President Trump has signaled that the eight-month war will both escalate and end soon after Tuesday’s midterm elections.

“The only reason we are not finished with Iran is because I want to be nice,” Trump told a crowd at a campaign rally in Iowa Sunday night. “I want to try and save all those lives if I can. But at some point, we’re going to have to give them the hammer,” he added. “It’s going to be over very soon. Very soon.” Earlier Monday, Trump gave a one-word answer when asked whether he would resume attacks on Iran after the midterms. Aerial view of Qeshm, an Iranian island in the Strait of Hormuz.

Olga Maria Toli – stock.adobe.com “No,” the president told reporters after giving a speech at the Reflecting Pool in Washington, DC. “We had a war with Iran. We won,” Trump said in his remarks. “I don’t know if you even call it a war because we haven’t been doing any fighting for months, you know. We control the Strait of Hormuz.” The attack on Qeshm Island comes as US and Iranian negotiators are pushing for a peace deal. “Consultations through mediators are very intensive,” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said after his team departed Qatar on Sunday.

“We have presented our conditions and proposals and everything depends on the political rationality of Washington,” he added. US Central Command did not immediately respond to The Post’s request for comment. This is a breaking story. Please check back for updates.

Read the original article on nypost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

The New York Post reports a secret US strike on Iran's Qeshm Island but states, in its own voice and without a source, that the island stores the Iranian government's ballistic missiles, and gives the US officials' stated aim of the strikes as plain fact. It leaves out what other outlets reported was actually hit, a surface-to-air missile launcher, and the Iranian account of the day, so a reader is steered towards the US justification.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “has been used by the Iranian regime to store ballistic missiles”

    Why this matters
    The Post states in its own voice, with no source, that Qeshm Island has been used to store ballistic missiles, right after naming it as Monday's target.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established that the island is a ballistic missile store and that this is what the US strike was aimed at.
    The context
    No source is given for the claim in the article. Other outlets reported, citing a US official, that the strike destroyed a surface-to-air missile launcher after the IRGC fired at a US aircraft, not a ballistic missile store.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “aimed at securing the Strait of Hormuz”

    Why this matters
    The Post gives the purpose of the strikes, securing the Strait of Hormuz, in its own narration as part of the opening sentence.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the US government's stated aim as the established purpose of the strikes.
    The context
    The aim is how US officials described the strikes to the Wall Street Journal. The Post's own next sentence attributes the defensive description to US officials, and other outlets also mark it as the officials' account.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Iranian regime”

    Why this matters
    The Post calls Iran's government "the Iranian regime" in its own narration.
    The impression it gives
    A reader absorbs a verdict on the Iranian government's legitimacy as plain description.
    The context
    Nothing in the article supports the label. "Iran's government" carries the same facts without the verdict.

    Show it in the article

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The Post never says what the strike hit. Other outlets reported, citing a US official, that a US fighter jet destroyed a surface-to-air missile launcher after the IRGC fired an anti-aircraft missile. Without this, and with the unsourced line on ballistic missile storage, a reader believes the strike targeted ballistic missile stores.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  5. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The Post gives only the US account of the strike. It leaves out Iranian media reports of five explosions and aircraft overhead, the IRGC's statement that it downed two US drones south of Qeshm, and that Iran had not commented publicly.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from New York Post

  1. 2 NovTrump gives blunt, one-word answer on if he'll resume Iran strikes after midterms3.0
  2. 2 NovTucker Carlson wildly claims that Trump could nuke Iran within days3.0
  3. 2 NovIranians have left Doha talks, draft proposal for US deal being circulated, official says0.0
  4. 1 NovIran's boosted weapons capabilities have caused up to $15B in US base damage: report6.0
  5. 31 OctIf Iran war erupts, Israel may be plotting another 'Operation Grim Beeper' style attack: sources7.3

Everything we scored from New York Post