The Jewish Chronicle, on Gaza, 9 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Israel approves deployment of first 250 foreign troops in Gaza as peace plan efforts accelerate

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Israel has approved the deployment of the first 250 foreign troops into Gaza as part of the planned International Stabilisation Force (ISF). Military officers from several countries, accompanied by American forces, have reportedly been spotted near the Gaza border in recent weeks, as the US expands its military presence and prepares for the force to enter the territory. The authorisation, first reported by Walla and confirmed by security officials, covers an initial contingent of approximately 250 foreign soldiers.

Indonesia, Morocco, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Uganda and Albania have expressed willingness to participate, with Kazakhstan offering medical and logistical support and Kosovo proposing assistance with security and policing operations. The wider ISF, which will operate under the US-backed Board of Peace, is intended to help establish security in Gaza, support a new civilian administration and facilitate the transition away from Hamas rule. Its commander, Major General Jasper Jeffers of the US Army, previously outlined longer-term ambitions for a force of up to 20,000 soldiers, alongside the training of 12,000 Palestinian police officers.

Turkey’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, has reportedly pressed Washington to allow Turkish participation, but Israeli officials have firmly rejected the proposal. Jerusalem's objections centre on Erdoğan's increasingly hostile rhetoric towards Israel and Turkey's hosting of Hamas officials. Israeli assessments have also linked Hamas operatives based in Turkey to in which two IDF soldiers were killed, according to the reports.

Israeli defence officials are also said to be concerned about the speed at which the multinational force could enter Gaza and the possibility that its presence could eventually become larger than Israel's own military deployment in the area. One security official warned: "It is not unrealistic that the [IDF’s] Gaza Division and Southern Command could wake up one day and discover that there is a foreign multinational force with more soldiers than the number of troops in the Gaza Division.

“Israel needs to be prepared for several diplomatic and security scenarios with implications on the ground." Meanwhile, US President Trump has personally urged Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to accelerate the implementation of his Gaza peace plan following Israel's October 27 election. During a telephone conversation on Thursday, the president reportedly told the Israeli premier that he wanted progress on the agreement regardless of which government ultimately takes office.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner also participated in the call, according to Axios. The 20-point plan envisages Hamas disarming, Gaza being demilitarised and control transferring to a Palestinian technocratic administration. Reconstruction would follow only once progress towards disarmament had been verified. A senior US official said: "The implementation will be difficult but we believe it is a good plan for Israel.

Nevertheless, we can't do it with one hand tied behind our back. "We want to move forward collaboratively and we need full cooperation and partnership from the Israeli government.” The US has also been expanding a military base near the Gaza border, where equipment including trucks, armoured personnel carriers and medical evacuation vehicles is being brought in. The former IDF facility has been upgraded with surveillance systems, guard towers and security infrastructure, and is now protected by armed American troops around the clock.

Preparations are also underway for a proposed new Emirati-backed residential compound on part of the ruins of Rafah. The project, described by Israeli officials as a "terror-free" city, would initially accommodate a limited number of Palestinians following stringent security screening. The multinational force is expected to provide security around the site, although no timetable has been announced. The developments come as Gaza faces worsening conditions following heavy rainfall and flooding which have devastated makeshift shelters housing displaced Palestinians.

five people, including three children and two women, died. Spokesman Mahmud Bassal said: “A sandy embankment collapsed onto tents housing displaced people at a shelter center south of Deir al-Balah in the central Gaza Strip. “Rescue teams are continuing to search for missing people.” Israel's military has also been monitoring the situation, with IDF Chief of Staff Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir reportedly convening an emergency meeting over concerns about the humanitarian crisis.

According to Channel 12, .

Read the original article on thejc.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Jewish Chronicle calls Gaza's Civil Defence "Hamas-run" when it reports five people, three of them children, killed when an embankment collapsed onto tents, and uses "terrorist attack" and "terror group" with no basis beyond Israeli assessments. It ends on Israeli officials' fear that Hamas will "exploit" images of suffering, with nothing set against it. These are word choices; the core facts of the troop deployment are attributed and match other coverage.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “The Hamas-run Civil Defence said”

    Why this matters
    The words "Hamas-run" attach a political label to Gaza's Civil Defence as the source for five deaths, three of them children.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is nudged to treat the count of people killed when an embankment collapsed onto tents as a partisan claim.
    The context
    The Civil Defence is a rescue service, and its spokesman gives a concrete, checkable account of the collapse. Israeli sources in the same article carry no comparable qualifier: the soldiers' deaths and the army's meeting are reported plainly.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“A sandy embankment collapsed onto tents housing displaced people”
    • Elsewhere in the article“two IDF soldiers were killed”

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “a recent terrorist attack near Hebron”

    Why this matters
    The JC calls an attack in which two soldiers were killed a "terrorist attack" in its own words, inside a sentence otherwise attributed to Israeli assessments.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the terrorism label as an established description of the attack.
    The context
    The only basis given is Israeli assessments and unnamed reports. The people killed were soldiers, which the article itself states.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“according to the reports”

    Show it in the article

    “before the terror group has disarmed”

    Why this matters
    The JC closes the article by calling Hamas "the terror group" in its own voice, not in the officials' quoted words.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the outlet's verdict on Hamas as the frame for the last line about Gaza's suffering.
    The context
    The quoted officials' words are only "exploit the humanitarian crisis"; the label is added by the outlet.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the transition away from Hamas rule”

    Show it in the article

  3. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Minor

    “Israeli security officials fear Hamas could "exploit the humanitarian crisis" and images of suffering in Gaza to increase international pressure for reconstruction”

    Why this matters
    The JC ends the article on Israeli officials' concern that images of suffering will be used as leverage.
    The impression it gives
    A reader leaves with the suffering of displaced Palestinians framed as a pressure tactic.
    The context
    The article itself has just reported five people, including three children, killed when tents collapsed, and rescuers searching for the missing. No Palestinian voice responds to the officials' framing.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“including three children and two women”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Rescue teams are continuing to search for missing people”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “A sandy embankment collapsed onto tents housing displaced people at a shelter center south of Deir al-Balah in the central Gaza Strip.”

    It quotes the rescue spokesman's concrete account of how and where the people died, so the reader knows what happened.

  • “first reported by Walla and confirmed by security officials”

    It attributes the approval to its sources rather than stating it bare, consistent with the Jerusalem Post's account.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jewish Chronicle

  1. 2 NovBBC admits error after inviting influencer who hailed Israel’s October 7 ‘humiliation’ on Sunday show0.0
  2. 2 NovIsraeli war veteran who lost leg in Gaza completes New York Marathon – 3 weeks after triathlon0.0
  3. 2 Nov‘I loved every minute’: London dream comes true for former hostage Doron Steinbrecher0.0
  4. 1 NovFormer Hamas hostages Aviva and Keith Siegel welcome baby granddaugther0.0
  5. 29 OctPro-Palestine MPs call for more sanctions against Israel over ‘Gaza aid restrictions’7.3

Everything we scored from The Jewish Chronicle