The Jerusalem Post, on West Bank, 25 October 2026

The Jerusalem Post reports that Israeli forces shot and seriously wounded a Palestinian man near Hebron and then did not detain him, and it presses the military over the removal of some 2,000 Palestinians, calling the operation "apparently a collective punishment measure". But in its own voice it labels the two Palestinians killed on Friday "terrorists" on the army's word, and it writes the mass expulsion of 2,000 people as an "evacuation". No Palestinian is named or quoted anywhere in the piece, while the two Israeli soldiers killed are given ranks and full names.

8.7

Severe

out of 10

What we found

  1. Labels people on one side's word

    Severe

    “mapping the terrorists' homes”

    What the words do
    Repeats the army's label as settled fact while describing the preparation of the dead men's homes for demolition.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the houses being mapped for destruction belong to proven terrorists.
    What is actually the case
    The article attributes the rest of this passage to a "joint statement" from the security forces, and attributes the terrorist description elsewhere to the IOF, yet here the outlet adopts the label as its own.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the IDF said no additional terrorists were involved”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Two Palestinian men were shot dead during the confrontation. The Israeli army says they carried out the attack and that no others were involved; that account has not been independently verified.

  2. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “Israeli security forces have forcibly evacuated some 2,000 Hebron-area Palestinians”

    What the words do
    Uses the military's word "evacuated" for the forced removal of 2,000 people from their homes.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That people were moved out of harm's way, as in an emergency evacuation.
    What is actually the case
    The article describes a punitive operation in which homes were destroyed and families removed because of family ties; the words expelled and displaced appear nowhere in the piece.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “expelled” and “displaced”.

    Show it in the article

    “the 2,000 evacuated Palestinians”

    What the words do
    Carries the same word into the outlet's own description of the people themselves, now without even the qualifier "forcibly".
    What a reader comes away believing
    That these 2,000 people were simply relocated, an administrative act.
    What is actually the case
    By the article's own account they were removed with no stated offence beyond family connection, which the piece itself calls "apparently a collective punishment measure".

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“apparently a collective punishment measure”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli occupation forces have expelled some 2,000 Palestinians from the Hebron area since Friday and destroyed an unspecified number of homes and other structures.

  3. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “a Palestinian man”

    What the words do
    Leaves the man shot and seriously wounded unnamed, while the two Israeli soldiers killed are given ranks and full names in the next sentence.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the Israeli dead are individuals and the Palestinian wounded man is an incident.
    What is actually the case
    Every source in the article is the Israeli military or Army Radio; no Palestinian, including the wounded man or any of the 2,000 people expelled, is quoted or named.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Staff Sergeant Ron Yonatan Roytman and Sergeant Yuval Shai Svilem”
    • On the recordReporting on Israel's assault on Gaza and on the Greens' Zionism motion has given Israeli, pro-Israel and Israeli-government sources far more space than Palestinian voices, who are quoted least when the story concerns them.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never tells the reader that Hebron is in the occupied West Bank, where the International Court of Justice has ruled Israel's occupation unlawful. Without it a reader takes the mass removal of residents and the destruction of buildings as ordinary policing on Israel's own territory.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show where it belongs

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

IDF seriously injures, fails to detain Palestinian accused of attempted ramming attack - report

The IDF seriously wounded for allegedly attempting to run over soldiers near Hebron, but failed to detain him afterward, Army Radio reported on Sunday afternoon. According to Army Radio, the incident occured on Friday near Kafr Dura, shortly after the fatal Hebron attack that killed Staff Sergeant Ron Yonatan Roytman and Sergeant Yuval Shai Svilem. Three others were lightly wounded in the attack.Two terrorists were killed during the confrontation, and the IDF said no additional terrorists were involved.Army Radio reported that while it reached out to the IDF for clarification on the matter on Friday, the military only responded on Sunday, saying that soldiers operating in the area "spotted a vehicle driving suspiciously and accelerated toward them, and in response, opened fire."Despite claiming the man tried to run over soldiers, Army Radio reported that the IDF did not detain the man for questioning over the incident.The IDF told Army Radio that it was reviewing the matter, but allegedly did not answer additional questions about its failure to detain the Palestinian.IDF, Shin Bet forcibly evacuate Hebron Palestinians in response to Friday attackSince the Friday attack, and destroyed an unspecified number of structures in the vicinity.In a Friday night statement, the IDF said that it had launched a counterterrorism operation in the Hebron area following Friday morning's deadly Hamas terrorist attack. Security forces are conducting systematic searches for terrorist infrastructure and weapons in the area and questioning dozens of suspects, according to the joint statement.The operation follows a series of counterterrorism measures carried out since Friday morning, including , sealing off the Hebron and Halhul areas, establishing roadblocks, and conducting operations in nearby villages. Security forces are also removing illegal infrastructure that could pose a security threat near the site of the attack.Evacuated Palestinians connected to Hamas-linked Gaza clan, IDF saysHowever, the IDF provided little information about the offenses of , other than to say that they were familially connected to the Hamas-linked Gaza clan.It also said it destroyed illegally built structures that could make security operations harder to carry out. However, the military was extremely vague about what those operations were and why entire buildings needed to be destroyed to carry them out.Pressed about how many of the 2,000 hamula (“clan”) members have records linking them to terror (or at a minimum, to rock throwing), multiple IDF sources did not appear to have any specific information on the topic.Rather, the operation seemed to be motivated by public statements made by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz about clearing or destroying the neighborhood of the two men involved in the terror incident on Friday – apparently a collective punishment measure.Yonah Jeremy Bob and Richard Offenbacher contributed to this report.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post