Daily Mail, on UK Politics, 14 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Rejoining EU would cost £750m a week, new campaign claims as Andy Burnham

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

We do not republish articles from Daily Mail. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.

Read the original article on dailymail.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Daily Mail reports a Brexit campaign group's claim that rejoining the EU would cost £750m a week and keeps that figure attributed in the headline. In its own voice the headline says the Prime Minister "cozies up to Brussels", a verdict the body does not support. The Mail gives seven sentences to the campaign's founders and two to an unnamed government source at the end, and no one in the article tests how the figure was calculated.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “cozies up to Brussels”

    Why this matters
    The words "cozies up to Brussels" describe the Prime Minister's planned trip in the Mail's own voice as ingratiating himself with the EU.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it that Burnham is fawning over Brussels, as a matter of fact rather than opinion.
    The context
    The body reports only that he will visit Brussels and sign a reset deal, and that he has called for an honest discussion about closer relations. Nothing in the article supports the verdict carried by "cozies up".

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“during which he will sign a 'reset deal' with Europe”

    Show it in the article

  2. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “Stay Out chairman Oliver Lewis, the UK's former deputy chief Brexit negotiator, told the Telegraph”

    Why this matters
    This opens seven straight sentences of quotes from the campaign's chairman and Lord Gove (S10 to S16), restating the £750m figure.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears the campaign's case at length and repeated, and nobody tests the figure itself.
    The context
    The only reply is two sentences from an unnamed government source at the end, and no one in the article assesses how the £750m was calculated.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“A Government source told the Telegraph”

What it gets right

  • “new campaign claims”

    The headline keeps the £750m figure attributed to the campaign rather than stating it as the Mail's own fact.

  • “Remainers rubbished that claim on the basis that it overlooked both the Thatcher rebate and EU funds spent in the UK.”

    It reminds readers that the earlier Vote Leave cost figure was disputed and explains why.

  • “People across the country know Brexit has made us worse off.”

    It gives the government's response, so the campaign's claim does not have the last word.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mail

  1. 14 NovYoung people deserve legal guarantee of job or training says Alan Milburn but will lose benefits if they say no - as Labour die-hards prepare to rebel3.0
  2. 14 NovEgypt lists British Muslim organisation behind pro-Palestine marches in London as 'extremist' terror group - but it is still free to operate in UK6.0
  3. 14 NovDemolition Day: This Cheshire farmhouse will be knocked down tomorrow after planners ruled it had been built illegally on green belt land3.0
  4. 14 NovBORIS JOHNSON: Burnham's EU sell-out is an abomination - a betrayal of Brexit and a cynical distraction from Labour's total inability to fix our economy0.0
  5. 13 Nov'This war isn't over yet': People of Piddington vow to fight on as Angela Rayner approves plans for migrant camp for 1,256 single males near their village3.0

Everything we scored from Daily Mail