We do not republish articles from Daily Mail. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.
The Daily Mail reports a council's planning enforcement against a retired builder's converted barn in Cheshire, his failed appeals and his adjourned sentencing. It fairly attributes the council's position and his own. The only problem is a minor one: the headline says the house will be knocked down tomorrow, while the body says the demolition runs for two weeks to November 28.
Headline goes beyond the article
Minor
“will be knocked down tomorrow”
Why this matters
The headline's words "will be knocked down tomorrow" present the demolition as a single event finished in one day.
The impression it gives
A reader believes the house will be gone by the next day.
The context
The body says demolition work starts on Saturday and is due to run until November 28. Council inspectors are only due to check it on December 14. The headline turns the start of a two-week job into its completion.
How we know
Elsewhere in the article“due to start on Saturday and finish on November 28”
Elsewhere in the article“council inspectors authorised to visit on December 14 to check the demolition”
“Mr Devine insists he never needed planning permission, but the council said it was an entirely new house - not the original barn - and ordered its demolition in March 2019.”
It puts the owner's position and the council's ruling side by side, and attributes each to the party that holds it.
“fighting the order through the Planning Inspectorate, High Court and Court of Appeal - but lost every challenge”
It names each body that heard his challenge and states the outcome plainly, so a reader knows the ruling was tested and upheld.
“The judge also raised concerns that Mr Devine was unrepresented”
It reports the judge's concern for the defendant, so the man facing the order is not shown only through the council's case.