The Guardian, on Iran, 1 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

over US-Iran talks to reopen strait of Hormuz

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Officials from the Gulf states are “braced for the worst” as they wait for Washington’s response to an Iranian proposal that could reopen the strait of Hormuz before the US midterm elections on Tuesday. Indirect talks in Doha ran into a third day on Sunday with Qatar trying to negotiate the release of more than $6bn in Iranian assets, which could lead to the reopening of the strait of Hormuz and the restart of negotiations on Iran’s nuclear programme.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article ties the talks to the midterms but never says that Trump pledged no new attacks on Iran before the vote. It also omits reports that the US told Gulf allies to prepare for a "short and swift" round of fighting as early as November. Without this, a reader takes "braced for the worst" as a vague worry rather than a response to reported plans for strikes right after the election.

How we know

The United Arab Emirates envoy Anwar Gargash said another round of escalation was not in the interests of Iran or any of its neighbours. He said: “We are also, as we have shown before, braced for the worst.” He added: “Relations with Iran are essential, because Iran is our neighbour and we do not want to see it get caught up in a prolonged crisis.” Qatar’s mediation continued despite unidentified missiles striking a Pakistan-bound Qatari LNG tanker near the strait of Hormuz on Friday.

The attack came despite the ship receiving direct clearance and safe-passage approval from Tehran just hours earlier. In a bid to overcome the lack of trust on both sides, Qatar has been focusing its efforts on reaching an agreement for a plan to compress the process by which the US lifts sanctions and then Iran reopens the strait of Hormuz and starts nuclear talks. Iran has agreed to cut the timetable from seven to two days. View image in fullscreen Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said the country was ready for both defence and diplomacy.

Photograph: Abedin Taherkenareh/EPA Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said he hoped the US would choose “diplomacy over other paths”. He said Iran was ready for both defence and diplomacy, depending on Washington’s “rationality”. Araghchi said there were currently no plans for direct talks with Washington. Araghchi has not been attending the mediation in Doha and is due to go to Turkmenistan on Monday, but other Iranian diplomats are heavily involved.

Donald Trump said on Saturday the US had knocked out much of Iran’s military but still had to “take care of” one or two targets, as Tehran warned of reprisals if attacked. He maintained that negotiations with Iran to end the war, started by the US and Israel in February, were “going fine but you know they’re not very reliable”. Earlier on Saturday, the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, said the US was open to a diplomatic solution, while Iran’s security chief, Mohsen Rezaei, disclosed that he had received a letter from the US vice-president, JD Vance, seeking to revive talks.

Rezaei noted what he described as a positive change in “tone” from the US side but said he had yet to respond. View image in fullscreen The US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, said the US was open to a diplomatic solution. Photograph: Erik S Lesser/AFP/Getty Images Speaking to Al Jazeera on Saturday, Araghchi said Iran had offered to open the strait of Hormuz within two days of the US acting to lift the blockade on oil ships, stop blocking the release of Iranian assets and end sanctions on Iranian oil exports.

Ali Nikzad, the deputy speaker of Iran’s parliament, once again signalled that Tehran would be unwilling to discuss its nuclear programme, saying: “Our enemies must understand that the Iranian nation has made a decision not to negotiate on the nuclear issue under any circumstances or under any pressure. This great nation gave its enemies enough opportunity to negotiate in this area, but was faced with repeated breaches of promises and illegal bombing of part of peaceful nuclear facilities.”

was having wider international repercussions than the Vietnam war. He told Iranian TV on Saturday: “Today, wherever Trump goes, he must answer why he started the war against Iran. There is no family in America that has not endured the pressure caused by the war in Iran.” Explore more on these topics Iran US-Israel war on Iran Strait of Hormuz Qatar United Arab Emirates Middle East and north Africa news Share Reuse this content

Read the original article on theguardian.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Guardian reports the Qatari-mediated indirect talks in Doha on reopening the strait of Hormuz and states plainly that the US and Israel started the war in February. Its headline pins a UAE envoy's words on the negotiators. It twice marks an Iranian official's words as claims while Trump simply "said". It also omits that Trump pledged no attacks before the midterms and that Gulf states were reportedly told to prepare for fighting soon after.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “Negotiators ‘braced for worst’”

    Why this matters
    The headline puts the quoted words "braced for worst" in the mouths of the negotiators in the US-Iran talks.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the people negotiating in Doha expect the talks to fail.
    The context
    The words come from Anwar Gargash, the UAE envoy. The article never places the UAE in the Doha talks, which Qatar is mediating. S1 widens one man's quote to "Officials from the Gulf states".

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The United Arab Emirates envoy Anwar Gargash said”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Qatar trying to negotiate the release”

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Rezaei claimed Trump was being hounded by a war that he claimed”

    Why this matters
    The Guardian uses "claimed" twice in one sentence for the Iranian security chief's view of the war.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is steered to treat Rezaei's words as doubtful assertion.
    The context
    Trump's contested statement that the US had knocked out much of Iran's military is introduced with a neutral "said". Two officials' views get unequal verbs.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Donald Trump said on Saturday the US had knocked out much of Iran’s military”

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article ties the talks to the midterms but never says that Trump pledged no new attacks on Iran before the vote. It also omits reports that the US told Gulf allies to prepare for a "short and swift" round of fighting as early as November. Without this, a reader takes "braced for the worst" as a vague worry rather than a response to reported plans for strikes right after the election.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “the war, started by the US and Israel in February”

    The Guardian names in its own voice who started the war rather than writing it as something that simply broke out.

  • “Iran had offered to open the strait of Hormuz within two days of the US acting to lift the blockade on oil ships, stop blocking the release of Iranian assets and end sanctions on Iranian oil exports”

    The article sets out Iran's own proposal in full, attributed and with its conditions, instead of reducing Iran to a line of refusal.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Guardian

  1. 30 OctGulf states must rethink trillion-dollar defence in light of US-Iran war, says report3.0
  2. 29 OctJD Vance letter may offer last chance to avert fresh conflict between US and Iran3.0
  3. 28 OctGulf states working on multipart peace deal to avert renewal of US-Iran war3.0
  4. 26 OctHigh-level delegation visits Iran to try to avert flare-up with US and Israel3.0
  5. 23 OctUS and Israel are warned against launching fresh strikes on Iran3.0

Everything we scored from The Guardian