The Guardian, on Iran, 23 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

US and Israel are warned against launching fresh strikes on Iran

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Foreign ministers at a summit of eight European and Middle Eastern countries have urged the US and Israel not to renews their attacks on Iran, warning a fresh outbreak of fighting would spread conflict and push oil prices even higher. The development of a new multinational “anti-war bloc” represents a challenge to the increasingly open plans by the US and Israel to relaunch strikes on Iran while talks on Tehran’s nuclear programme remain deadlocked.

The Turkish foreign minister, Hakan Fidan, joint convener of the summit in Istanbul, said: “Military intervention in Iran is not any kind of solution. We agreed that a new military attack would spread the war and the conflict in the region. All the countries around the table do not want the war to spread even more, once again.” Ministers also demanded an end to the Houthi assaults on Saudi Arabia, and an immediate opening of the strait of Hormuz currently blockaded by Iranian ships and drones.

Jean-Noël Barrot, the French foreign minister, said another war between Iran and the US would be bad for both sides, and only worsen rising oil prices, which have hit their highest level since May. Ed Miliband, the UK foreign secretary, also urged both sides to embrace diplomacy. The Istanbul meeting, an unprecedented gathering of regional and European leaders initiated by Turkey and Germany , represented a rare chance for European ministers to have any input into the crises afflicting the Middle East, including in Yemen, Palestine and Iran.

They have largely been left as bystanders, apart from sending air force protection to Saudi Arabia as it tries to fend off Houthi drone and missile assaults on its airports and energy installations. The Middle Eastern states were represented by Fidan, Egypt’s Badr Abdelatty, Pakistan’s Ishaq Dar and Saudi Arabia’s Faisal bin Farhan. Pakistan, Turkey and Saudi Arabia formed the Mecca defensive security pact in August, a grouping Egypt may join.

The European side was represented by Barrot, Miliband, Germany’s Johann Wadephul and Italy’s Antonio Tajani. The agenda covered the Palestinian issue, including settlement expansion, settler violence and the two-state solution, as well as security in the strait of Hormuz, Yemen and efforts to end the Russia-Ukraine war and prevent spillover into the Black Sea. Wadephul said: “We are united by the impact these deadlocked conflicts are having on the economy and security of our countries and by the will to seek new ways to bring about solutions.”

He made no criticism of the US but accused “the Houthis and Iran of blackmailing world trade and continuing to stranglehold global supplies of energy and fertiliser”. “We are feeling the effects of the attacks on shipping routes and whether at the petrol pump or the supermarket,” he said. “Elsewhere there is threat of famine.” Tajani said the aim of the meeting was to work for “de-escalation to guarantee freedom of navigation”. “I do not believe the problem can be solved from a purely military standpoint,” he added.

“If we want to reopen Hormuz, which is vital for our economies, .” Explore more on these topics Middle East and north Africa Europe Iran Middle East peace talks US-Israel war on Iran Houthis Iran nuclear deal news Share Reuse this content

Read the original article on theguardian.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Guardian reports an Istanbul summit at which eight European and Middle Eastern foreign ministers warned the US and Israel against renewed strikes on Iran. It names the US and Israel as the parties planning the attacks and attributes each minister's view to them by name. Its one small gap: it closes on a European demand that Iran change course and gives no Iranian response, though the same outlet had reported Iran's offer to reopen the strait.

  1. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “we must promote dialogue and make Iran understand that this attitude cannot continue”

    Why this matters
    The Guardian ends the article on Tajani's words that Iran must be made to 'understand that this attitude cannot continue', with no Iranian voice anywhere in the piece.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking the strait stays closed only because Iran refuses, and that Iran has put forward nothing.
    The context
    Four days earlier the same outlet reported that Iran had offered to open the strait in six days in return for sanctions relief. The article never gives Iran's position on the demands made at the summit.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “the increasingly open plans by the US and Israel to relaunch strikes on Iran”

    It names the US and Israel as the parties planning the attacks, in the active voice, rather than writing of a vague risk of renewed war.

  • “urged the US and Israel not to renews their attacks on Iran”

    It says plainly that the attacks on Iran were the US's and Israel's and are being urged not to resume.

  • “He made no criticism of the US but accused”

    It keeps Wadephul's charge against Iran and the Houthis as his accusation, in quotation marks, and notes what he left out.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Guardian

  1. 23 OctOil hits five-month high amid fears US will renew strikes on Iran0.0
  2. 22 OctRevealed: billionaire Reform donor was in business with foundation linked to Iranian regime3.0
  3. 22 OctIran threatens to strike oil and AI facilities across Gulf if US and Israel renew attacks3.0
  4. 22 OctTell us: do you live near the Strait of Hormuz? How is the US-Iran conflict affecting your life?3.0
  5. 21 OctTroubled waters: life during wartime for Iranians on the strait of Hormuz3.0

Everything we scored from The Guardian