The Guardian, on Iran, 21 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Troubled waters: life during wartime for Iranians on the strait of Hormuz

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Capt Farouq turns the wheel as he watches the ferry terminal of Bandar Abbas grow smaller, its bright lights flickering in the distance. In front of him, the navigation radar beeps periodically, its green and pink lights glowing in the darkness. The ferry, today at about half capacity with roughly 100 passengers, turns and heads into the darkness of the strait of Hormuz. View image in fullscreen Capt Farouq pulls into the deeper waters View image in fullscreen He’s been a captain for the past 18 years, and the strait of Hormuz is his second home Farouq, 39, sits comfortably in his cabin, overlooking the pitch black horizon as he sails towards Hormuz Island, a short commute of about half an hour from the Iranian mainland’s Haqqani Port, for 340,000 toman, about £1.

He is relaxed and smiles as he pulls into the deeper waters. He’s been a captain for the past 18 years, and the strait of Hormuz is his second home. Farouq says the crossings have not stopped since the start of the US-Israeli war on Iran on 28 February, although passenger numbers are down and the journey has become more dangerous. For months, Farouq has heard explosions coming from the strait, unclear as to whether that is air defence or attacks, or both.

Tonight is no different. Inside the ferry, passengers say they have gotten used to the sounds too, and, to an extent, the war itself. They drink tea and smoke cigarettes. Some nap, while others entertain their children. It’s hot and humid, the air thick, the windows fogged with condensation. View image in fullscreen One of the ships stranded in the strait of Hormuz Even with a fragile ceasefire in place, here on the coast, it has barely felt as though the war has stopped.

According to Iranian government sources, attacks on the southern port of Bandar Abbas have damaged 760 fishing and commercial vessels. Farouq says his own ferry was also damaged by shrapnel while docked at the port, though it was quickly repaired. Since the start of the war, Iranian forces have repeatedly attacked vessels attempting to cross the strait. In the first week of October alone, at least 12 attacks were reported against oil, liquefied natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas tankers, sending oil prices back above $100 a barrel .

With pressure mounting on the US president, Donald Trump, before the midterm elections, he is rumoured to be once again considering strikes. But beyond the headlines and global markets, the strait is first and foremost a lifeline for many Iranians living in the southern province of Hormozgan. View image in fullscreen Fishers returning from sea View image in fullscreen View image in fullscreen Fishers in Bandar Abbas selling their catch on the street Fishers, captains and harbour workers all depend on the strait for their livelihoods and the war has made their work increasingly difficult.

Fishers can no longer venture as far out, , and many people fled Bandar Abbas in the early months of the war for smaller, more remote villages in search of safety. View image in fullscreen Local residents fishing for their own daily consumption View image in fullscreen View image in fullscreen Anvar Sadat, a 38-year-old fisher who works at Bandar Abbas’s fish market, says business has slowed and that making ends meet has become increasingly difficult.

“Fishing boats can’t go out as freely as before the war, and our movement is restricted,” he says, adding that . View image in fullscreen Anvar Sadat, who works at the fish market in Bandar Abbas “This place was hell,” says Abdul Salam, a 45-year-old garbage collector. The beaches, particularly those near the port, were among the most dangerous places during the height of the war, he says, describing heavy attacks that forced him to stop working almost entirely to avoid the risk.

Life on the island, however, has been different, Farouq explains as he steers into the small, dimly lit port of Hormuz Island, his last crossing of the day before heading back to his family for the night. View image in fullscreen Hassan, 28, cafe owner – has run a cafe on the island for eight years View image in fullscreen View image in fullscreen Hormuz Island has long been known as a kind of “hippy paradise”, a place Iranians have come to regard as “free”.

Artists and creatives moved here from bigger cities in search of peace; women swim in bathing suits, writers and painters find space to work, and life moves slower. There is “love and magic” here, as Yashar, a 35-year-old surfer, puts it, “a different rhythm”. View image in fullscreen Yashar, a 35-year-old surfer View image in fullscreen A group of local women swimming off the coast of Hormuz Island Life here has changed little, Yashar says, although the war has brought some new restrictions, and a handful of attacks, mostly on infrastructure.

The roughly 8,000 residents are trying to support each other, and to preserve the sense of freedom that has set the island apart, he adds. The government has closed off parts of Hormuz Island’s north, but beyond the now restricted areas, life has continued, he explains. “As long as you don’t go north, they leave you alone,” he says of the army. View image in fullscreen Omran, a 45-year-old tour guide – the tourism sector has been hit by the conflict View image in fullscreen View image in fullscreen View image in fullscreen The Majara hotel, also known as Rainbow accommodation, is one of Hormuz’s attractions.

It has been closed since the beginning of the war “The tourism sector has taken the biggest hit,” says Omran, a 45-year-old tour guide, adding that he prefers to go by his first name only. “Guesthouses and homestays remain closed, as do restaurants and many cafes.” Visitors have largely stopped coming since the war, dealing a heavy blow to an island whose economy depends on tourism and fishing, both of which have been disrupted. View image in fullscreen The Salt valley on Hormuz Island, one of the island’s tourist attractions From the higher parts of the island, Omran says, it is possible to see deep into the strait on clear days, when the haze lifts and the humid air clears, all the way to the mountains of Khasab in Oman.

Residents have climbed up these barren mountains of red and white stone, at times watching the war unfold in the distance. Tankers remain stranded in the strait, explosions can be heard regularly. Yet residents also say the war has not driven them from the island. View image in fullscreen One of the ships stranded in the strait of Hormuz Khaleh Kaniz, a 67-year-old painter who was born and raised on Hormuz, laughs when asked whether she had considered leaving in February, at the start of the war.

View image in fullscreen Khaleh Kaniz, a 67-year-old painter “Why should we leave? Where would we go? Our homes and our lives are here.” Explore more on these topics The Guardian picture essay Iran Strait of Hormuz Middle East and north Africa features Share Reuse this content

Read the original article on theguardian.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Guardian's picture essay names the US-Israeli war on Iran and gives Iranian residents the space to describe their lives. It writes the attacks on Hormozgan's ports and the killing of Bandar Abbas fishers in the passive, with no attacker named, while it names Iranian forces in the active voice as attackers of shipping. This is a minor lapse, since the article already tells the reader whose war it is.

  1. Hides who did it

    Minor

    “ports have come under attack”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Guardian writes the damage to Hormozgan's ports in the passive, with no attacker named.
    The impression it gives
    The reader learns that the ports were hit but not by whom, as if the attacks simply happened.
    The context
    The article frames the conflict as the US-Israeli war on Iran. It names Iranian forces when they attack, but it gives no one as the attacker of Iranian ports.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the start of the US-Israeli war on Iran on 28 February”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Iranian forces have repeatedly attacked vessels”

    Show it in the article

    “several of his colleagues in the city have been killed in attacks”

    Why this matters
    The only killings of Iranians in the piece appear as "killed in attacks", with no attacker given and nothing in the outlet's narration to supply one.
    The impression it gives
    The reader learns that fishers died but has no idea who killed them.
    The context
    These are deaths in Bandar Abbas during what the article calls the US-Israeli war on Iran. The Guardian never ties the killings to that campaign. The essay's one mention of Iranian dead is left without an actor.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the start of the US-Israeli war on Iran on 28 February”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Guardian

  1. 23 OctUS and Israel are warned against launching fresh strikes on Iran3.0
  2. 23 OctOil hits five-month high amid fears US will renew strikes on Iran0.0
  3. 22 OctRevealed: billionaire Reform donor was in business with foundation linked to Iranian regime3.0
  4. 22 OctIran threatens to strike oil and AI facilities across Gulf if US and Israel renew attacks3.0
  5. 22 OctTell us: do you live near the Strait of Hormuz? How is the US-Iran conflict affecting your life?3.0

Everything we scored from The Guardian