Daily Mail, on UK Politics, 23 October 2026

The Daily Mail reports the Education Secretary's proposal to let teachers work their contracted hours over four days, and its body sets out accurately that hours and school opening days would not change. The headline's added promise of "a pay rise too" goes further than anything the article reports, since the body says only that ministers may lift the ceiling on salaries to retain experienced staff. Nothing else in the piece misleads.

3.0

Minor

out of 10

What we found

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “and a pay rise too”

    What the words do
    The headline tells readers a pay rise is on offer alongside the four-day week.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That ministers are proposing to raise teachers' pay as well as cut their working days.
    What is actually the case
    The article reports only that ministers may remove the upper limit on salaries so schools can attract and keep experienced staff. It reports no pay rise for teachers generally.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

Teachers may get a four-day week...

Teachers could be permitted to work four-day weeks giving schools more flexible working hours, according to government plans. The Education Secretary, Lucy Powell, has received recommendations from an independent body advising ministers how to make the full-time teaching requirements of 195 days per year more lenient. Under the new plans, teachers in council-run schools could be allowed to fulfil their contracted hours over four days, but schools must still remain open for the full week. Flexible working hours are already a possibility at academies although government figures suggest they should still adhere to the 195 days per year framework which includes five days of staff training. Ministers may also lift the ceiling on teachers’ salaries in order to attract and keep experienced staff working in the classroom. Instead of the five-day week, head teachers could designate full-time teaching staff to work 1,265 hours over fewer days. While teachers could be allowed a four-day week some teachers would be timetabled to work the fifth day of the week ensuring students receive a full education. In an open letter from the Education Secretary to Mike Aldred, the chairman of the School Teachers’ Review Body, Ms Powell said there was uncertainty as to whether all schools could offer a reduced working week. Education Secretary, Lucy Powell, arrives for the weekly cabinet meeting at Downing Street on October 20 Ms Powell wrote an open letter to Mike Aldred, the chairman of the School Teachers’ Review Body (pictured) ‘We understand there is ambiguity within the current 195-day framework about schools’ ability to offer flexibility in individual teacher working patterns,’ she wrote. ‘We are proposing a targeted amendment to clarify that teachers may be available to work their directed hours up to 195 days (or pro rata equivalent), with the intention to provide leaders with greater flexibility to choose to depart from the 195-day requirement to respond to evolving workforce needs.’ The plans would enable teachers to fulfil their duties over fewer days but would not cement a four-day working week for all teaching staff, nor reduce the days schools must remain open. Ms Powell added that no teachers would be required to work any more than the 195 days a year expected of them and said the 1,265 hour limit required will not increase. The cap would cover lesson time, meetings and other duties and does not include work teachers carry out in their own time including lesson preparation and marking. Wider reforms around working hours were ruled out by the Education Secretary as part of the review. It comes after several warnings that inflexible working hours were pushing experienced teachers out of work. In last year's report, the independent body named four-day weeks and other amendments such as nine-day fortnights and remote work as some of the changes that could help recruitment and keep teachers in the classroom. The review also warned that schools were not falling over themselves to accept flexible working hours despite the popularity in other industries. Do YOU have a story? Email Joshua.Haining@dailymail.co.uk

Read the original article on dailymail.com (opens in a new tab)

What it gets right

  • “would not cement a four-day working week for all teaching staff, nor reduce the days schools must remain open”

    It tells readers plainly what the proposal does not do, correcting the impression that schools or teaching time would be cut.

  • “no teachers would be required to work any more than the 195 days a year expected of them”

    It attributes the reassurance to Powell rather than stating it in the paper's own voice.

  • “does not include work teachers carry out in their own time including lesson preparation and marking”

    It makes clear the 1,265-hour cap excludes marking and preparation, so readers do not take it as the whole of a teacher's workload.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mail

  1. 25 OctLabour MP said he 'feared the worst' during angry confrontation with constituent which left him thinking of murdered parliamentary colleagues including Jo Cox3.0
  2. 24 OctBBC education website used by millions takes down Leftist views after pushing 'extreme views' on migration and Net Zero6.0
  3. 24 OctCalls to investigate ex-Chancellor Rachel Reeves over secret meetings with City firms6.0
  4. 24 OctANDREW GRIFFITH: Healey must quit this job too if he fails to ramp up defence spending0.0
  5. 22 OctLondon bridges charity gave £1.1million to Muslim group whose trustee 'has ties to Hamas' while capital's river crossings crumble8.8

Everything we scored from Daily Mail