Daily Mail, on UK Politics, 22 October 2026

The Daily Mail builds a Hamas story out of a bridges charity grant by stringing together three removes: a grant to the Muslim Charities Forum, a trustee who runs another charity, and an employee of that charity's partner who has been charged in the United States. In its own voice the paper turns an investigation into Al-Khair Foundation into "alleged links to Hamas" held by the named trustee, and its headline puts words in quotation marks that nobody in the article says while blaming the charity for bridges it does not own. It also describes the starvation of Gaza as "Israel's response to the October 7 attacks".

8.8

Serious

out of 10

What we found

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “whose trustee 'has ties to Hamas'”

    What the words do
    Puts the phrase "has ties to Hamas" in quotation marks and attaches it to the trustee, as though someone in the article said it of him.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That a named source has stated that the Muslim Charities Forum's trustee has ties to Hamas.
    What is actually the case
    Nobody in the article says this. The body says the charity he heads, Al-Khair Foundation, is under investigation over alleged links; no allegation in the article is made against the trustee himself.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“which is currently under investigation for its alleged links to Hamas”

    Show it in the article

    “while capital's river crossings crumble”

    What the words do
    Sets the grant against decaying bridges, so the money appears to have been taken from bridge repairs.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That London's bridges are falling apart because the City Bridge Foundation gave money to a Muslim charity group.
    What is actually the case
    The article says the crumbling bridges are owned by local authorities or TfL, and the foundation maintains its own five bridges at no cost to the taxpayer from surplus funds.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“other bridges in the capital owned by local authorities or TfL”
    • Elsewhere in the article“supports and maintains five of London's bridges at no cost to the taxpayer”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    City bridges charity gave £1.17m to Muslim charity umbrella group whose treasurer runs a charity under Charity Commission investigation

  2. Smears a named person

    Serious

    “whose trustee has alleged links to Hamas”

    What the words do
    Transfers an allegation made about an organisation onto a named individual in the paper's own voice.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Shuaib Yusaf personally stands accused of links to Hamas.
    What is actually the case
    The article's own next paragraphs say the Charity Commission is investigating Al-Khair Foundation's alleged links, not Yusaf's. The piece contains no allegation against Yusaf himself, and reports he has stepped back from his MCF roles.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“which is currently under investigation for its alleged links to Hamas”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Yusaf has 'voluntarily' stepped back as treasurer and trustee”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The grant went to the Muslim Charities Forum, whose treasurer also runs Al-Khair Foundation, a charity the Charity Commission is investigating over alleged links to Hamas. No allegation has been made against the treasurer himself.

  3. Guilt by association

    Serious

    “The charity is now under scrutiny over a £1.17million grant it awarded to Muslim Charities Forum (MCF) in 2023”

    What the words do
    Puts the bridges charity's grant "under scrutiny" without saying who is scrutinising it, and makes the grant the hinge of a terrorism story.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the City Bridge Foundation grant is itself the subject of some official examination connected to Hamas.
    What is actually the case
    No investigation of the grant is reported anywhere in the article. The only inquiry named is the Charity Commission's statutory inquiry into Al-Khair Foundation, and MCF says none of the grant money reached that organisation.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“MCF says none of the grant”
    • Elsewhere in the article“The Charity Commission said it is probing the nature of AKF's links to Hasna.”

    Show it in the article

    “It comes after Mohammad Yousef Hasna, who worked for an AKF 'partner charity' in Gaza, was arrested”

    What the words do
    Hangs a US terrorism-financing prosecution onto the grant story through a fourth party: an employee of a partner of the charity run by MCF's trustee.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the £1.17m from the bridges charity sits somewhere near the money the FBI says was funnelled to Hamas.
    What is actually the case
    The article offers nothing tying the grant to Hasna or to Al-Khair. MCF says the money is used solely for its own UK programmes and is not passed to members or third parties, and Al-Khair says any suggestion it received those funds is entirely misleading.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“None of this funding is transferred or redistributed to MCF members or other third parties”
    • Elsewhere in the article“is entirely misleading”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The Charity Commission is investigating Al-Khair Foundation after an employee of a partner charity was charged in the United States. Both MCF and Al-Khair say no City Bridge Foundation money went to Al-Khair, and the article reports no evidence that it did.

  4. Tells the event as something else

    Serious

    “following Israel's response to the October 7 attacks by Hamas”

    What the words do
    Describes the cause of mass hunger and thirst in Gaza, in the paper's own voice, as a "response" to an attack.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Palestinians are going without food and water as a regrettable consequence of a reaction to Hamas, rather than through a documented campaign of destruction.
    What is actually the case
    A UN Commission of Inquiry has found that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. The article never uses the words genocide, siege or blockade, and names no act by Israeli occupation forces.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Al-Khair Foundation became known for its work in Gaza, where Israel's assault and siege, found by a UN commission to amount to genocide, have left millions of Palestinians without food, clean water and emergency aid.

  5. Unnamed critics carry the claim

    Minor

    “Critics have argued”

    What the words do
    Attributes the article's central complaint about the charity's spending to critics who are never named or quoted.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That identifiable people have publicly criticised the foundation's grant-making.
    What is actually the case
    No critic is named or quoted anywhere in the article.

    Show it in the article

    “Questions have now been raised”

    What the words do
    Uses a passive construction to assert that the charity's grant management is being questioned, with no questioner.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That some body or named figure has formally challenged how the foundation's grants are managed.
    What is actually the case
    The article names nobody raising these questions; the only quoted parties are the charity, MCF and Al-Khair, all defending their conduct.

    Show it in the article

  6. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “But it also uses its considerable fortune to send tens of millions of pounds to various social justice campaigns”

    What the words do
    Sets charitable grant-making against bridge maintenance with "But", and calls the endowment a "considerable fortune" and the grants "various social justice campaigns".
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the foundation is diverting money from its duty into fashionable causes.
    What is actually the case
    The article itself reports that the foundation began using funds for wider charitable purposes in 1995 once income exceeded the cost of maintaining its five bridges, and that only surplus funds are used.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“by which point its income far exceeded the cost of maintaining its five bridges”

    Show it in the article

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

London bridges charity gave £1.1million to Muslim group

A charity which protects some of London 's most iconic bridges awarded £1.1million to an organisation , it was revealed today. The City Bridge Foundation (CBF), set up in the 13th century initially to maintain London Bridge, today has a £1.5billion endowment and is also responsible for the maintenance of Tower Bridge, Blackfriars, Southwark and the Millennium Bridge. including climate change initiatives and a slavery review. that funds should instead be put towards protecting other bridges in the capital owned by local authorities or TfL . , an umbrella organisation for Muslim led charities, which pay an annual membership fee. MCF's treasurer, Shuaib Yusaf, currently heads up another charity, Al-Khair Foundation (AKF), which is currently under investigation for its alleged links to Hamas. AKF paid a £25,000 membership fee to MCF in 2024-2025, and delivers relief in impoverished areas. Founded in 2003, it has more recently been known for its work in Gaza, where millions of Palestinians have been in dire need of food, clean water and other emergency aid . But it is Hamas that AKF is alleged to have links to, after the Daily Mail revealed in August that the Charity Commission in the UK had launched a probe into the claims. The City Bridge Foundation, responsible for maintaining London's bridges, gave £1.17million to a Muslim charity organisation, whose treasurer and trustee is Shuaib Yusaf Critics have argued funds should be put towards protecting other bridges in the capital owned by local authorities or TfL, instead of social justice campaigns (Pictured: Hammersmith Bridge) The investigation focuses on whether AKF and its partners had connections to the terrorist group and had funded it in any way. MCF treasurer Shuaib Yusaf is also the CEO of AKF, although MCF says none of the grant, first reported by The Times , went to the organisation. A legal representative for MCF said that Yusaf had stepped back from his role since the launch of the Charity Commission probe, but he is still listed as a trustee on their website. after an FBI probe exposed alleged intercepted messages between Hasna and a senior Hamas leader and a document detailing payments totalling almost £4million to the terrorist organisation. It's alleged that Hasna, who has claimed to have been AKF's global director since January 2023, arranged with the Hamas leader to divert some food parcels and cash to the group. US prosecutors have charged Hasna, who was arrested in the UK on July 31, with conspiring to provide material support to Hamas, conspiring to finance terrorism, and financing terrorism, each of which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in jail. FBI New York Assistant Director James C Barnacle, Jr said at the time: 'Mohammad Hasna allegedly used a charity to funnel millions of dollars in aid to Hamas - a designated terrorist organization responsible for countless terrorist attacks, death, and destruction around the world.' The scale of AKF's rapid financial growth after the October 7 massacres appears to be a key part of the FBI's case. The US legal documents claim the 'sham charity's' gross income almost doubled from about $41.8million in 2023 to $81.56million in 2024. For the year ending July 31, 2025, it reported gross income of about $100million. Mohammad Yousef Hasna worked for an AKF 'partner charity' in Gaza, and was arrested after an FBI probe exposed alleged intercepted messages between him and a senior Hamas leader US prosecutors have charged Hasna, who was arrested in the UK on July 31, with conspiring to provide material support to Hamas, conspiring to finance terrorism, and financing terrorism These figures mirror AKF's accounts, which show income of £31million in 2023, £62million in 2024 and £75million last year. The Mail understands that Shin Bet, one of Israel's spy agencies, helped the FBI agents with their investigation into Hasna. The Charity Commission said it is probing the nature of AKF's links to Hasna. AKF told the Daily Mail it strongly denies funding or links to any proscribed organisation, and any suggestion it had received money from the CBF grant was 'entirely misleading'. MCF said any funding from the CBF supports its work in London, is not used for international humanitarian programmes or given to third parties, and AKF has never received services funded by any CBF grant. It added AKF's membership has been put on hold while the Charity Commission's inquiry is ongoing, and Yusaf has 'voluntarily' stepped back as treasurer and trustee, as well as his board membership. In a statement on its website, AKF said it self-referred to the Charity Commission following Hasna's arrest before the probe was launched. It said the 'extremely serious allegations against Al-Khair Foundation stem from a complaint made by a campaigning organisation, UK Lawyers for Israel'. It added: 'Al-Khair Foundation takes the allegations concerning the Foundation extremely seriously. 'It is cooperating fully with the statutory inquiry launched by the Charity Commission for England and Wales on 5 August 2026, in light of the arrest of Mohammad Yousef Hasna, an employee of a partner charity delivering humanitarian aid in Gaza.' It said it has appointed an independent consultant to 'establish the facts' and provide them to the inquiry. The CBF's original endowment came from tolls, rents and funds donated through wills, but has since expanded into property investment and other projects. It began allowing its funds to be used for wider charitable purposes in 1995, by which point its income far exceeded the cost of maintaining its five bridges. about how its grants and charity contributions are managed, as well as the appropriateness of the causes they support – especially given there are currently at least four other bridges on the Thames closed or restricted due to disrepair. A CBF spokesman said: 'City Bridge Foundation supports and maintains five of London's bridges at no cost to the taxpayer, paid for by property and funds built up over the last 900 years. 'As required under our charity's governing documents, these five Bridges are our primary purpose as a charity; the Bridges come first and we work hard to keep them open, safe and in good working condition. 'Our surplus funds not required for our Bridges support organisations through charitable activities to benefit Londoners. We have been doing this work since 1995. 'Every grant application is checked robustly and monitored. We take active steps to ensure this funding is used for the benefit of the inhabitants of Greater London.' A legal representative for MCF said in a letter to the Mail: 'MCF was awarded two grants by the City Bridge Foundation. Both grants were awarded following an open application process and MCF was one of eight such organisations which were granted funding. 'As regards the funding received in the context of the Anchor Programme, this has been and continues to be used solely for MCF’s own programmes and activities in the UK, including training and capacity-building for grassroots organisations serving marginalised communities across London. 'None of this funding is transferred or redistributed to MCF members or other third parties, whether directly or through sub-granting arrangements.' They added: 'As would be expected of any responsible, charitable organisation, as a matter of good practice, AKF’s membership of MCF has been placed on hold whilst the statutory inquiry is ongoing.' A spokesman for AKF said: 'Al-Khair Foundation categorically denies any links to, or funding of, proscribed organisations and is cooperating fully with the Charity Commission's ongoing inquiry. 'In August we informed the Muslim Charities Forum (MCF) of our decision to step back from its board with immediate effect, pending the outcome of the inquiry. 'Any suggestion of a connection between MCF's funding from City Bridge Foundation and Al-Khair Foundation, or that any of those funds have been allocated to us, is entirely misleading.'

Read the original article on dailymail.com (opens in a new tab)

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mail

  1. 25 OctLabour MP said he 'feared the worst' during angry confrontation with constituent which left him thinking of murdered parliamentary colleagues including Jo Cox3.0
  2. 24 OctBBC education website used by millions takes down Leftist views after pushing 'extreme views' on migration and Net Zero6.0
  3. 24 OctCalls to investigate ex-Chancellor Rachel Reeves over secret meetings with City firms6.0
  4. 24 OctANDREW GRIFFITH: Healey must quit this job too if he fails to ramp up defence spending0.0
  5. 23 OctTeachers may get a four-day week... and a pay rise too3.0

Everything we scored from Daily Mail