The Jerusalem Post, on West Bank, 25 October 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

IDF pushing for Hebron attack to be classified as clash between soldiers, terrorists, not terror

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

The IDF is making an effort to characterize Friday's incident in Hebron as an encounter between combat troops and two terrorists, rather than a terrorist attack, in an attempt to avoid professional criticism over the advance preparations of the Judea Regional Brigade, operating under the 98th Division.At the same time, however, the military says the troops' response prevented a larger attack. The IDF and Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) are still investigating the incident to determine what terrorist network assisted the attackers.

At the time of writing, the assessment is that the attack was carried out by a Hamas cell that received assistance from the organization's headquarters in Turkey. that received assistance from additional operatives in obtaining a handgun, an M4 rifle, ammunition, and training. The terrorists studied the terrain, conducted reconnaissance, and developed operational plans that enabled them to hold off IDF forces for more than 20 minutes.

During that time, the military was unable to deploy an attack drone or an aerial surveillance system to eliminate them.Nevertheless, the IDF has noted that the bravery of the soldiers must be acknowledged. The regional defense officer, who found himself caught up in the incident, and the deputy battalion commander actively engaged the terrorists and killed them.There is no doubt that this terrorist network operated under the noses of IDF and Shin Bet intelligence officials, despite a general warning that Hamas intended to carry out attacks in the area ahead of the elections scheduled for this coming Tuesday.Shin Bet, IDF arrest suspects for possible knowledge, support of terror attackOver the past 24 hours, IDF and Shin Bet forces have arrested several Palestinians suspected of assisting the terrorists, or at least knowing that they were preparing to carry out an attack.

The suspects were transferred to the Shin Bet for questioning, and further arrests are expected.IDF Central Command chief Maj. Gen. Avi Bluth emphasized that the military acted as a protective barrier, shielding the civilian population from terrorism, while Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz spoke of offensive operations.At a time when tensions in the West Bank are escalating, and the IDF has deployed an additional divisional headquarters, the 98th Division, to improve command and control capabilities in violent hotspots and areas facing an immediate terrorist threat, the question must be asked: What has the IDF actually done so far?IDF demolishes illegal structures in HebronThe IDF demolished illegal structures in the Hebron area earlier in the morning, .

Troops searched 200 buildings in Hebron without finding weapons, ammunition, or terrorist infrastructure. According to the defense minister, approximately 2,000 residents were evacuated. and that while IDF forces searched the area.A new and effective approach is needed to address terrorist hotspots in a city such as Hebron, which presents different challenges from the refugee camps in Jenin, Tulkarm, and Nablus.

Left out here: Drops what it reported before

The article never says that the 2,000 people removed were targeted for their family link to the attackers' clan. It also omits that army sources could not say how many of them had any record. Without this, a reader accepts the protective explanation in S9 rather than seeing a mass measure against relatives.

How we know

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article omits that the Palestinian Authority called the removals collective punishment. It also omits that B'Tselem warned of forcible displacement and unlawful destruction in Hebron. A reader sees only the army's and ministers' account of the measures.

How we know

Such an approach is necessary not only to prevent copycat attacks and attacks inspired by this incident, but also to dismantle organized terrorist networks.

The terrorists came from a very large clan in Hebron, one of whose members was released as part of the Gilad Schalit prisoner exchange deal. The threat of further terrorist attacks continues to loom.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

The Jerusalem Post tells its reader, in its own voice, that the removal of about 2,000 Hebron Palestinians was to protect them, though its own report the day before said they were forcibly evacuated in response to the attack. It also states flatly that same-day demolitions were unrelated to the attack, when Finance Minister Smotrich said he ordered demolitions to exact a price for it.

  1. Drops what it reported before

    Serious

    “the evacuation was intended to protect them from potential clashes”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Post explains the removal of some 2,000 residents as protection for them during searches.
    The impression it gives
    The removal was a humanitarian safety measure for the residents' own benefit.
    The context
    The Post reported the day before that IOF and the Shin Bet forcibly removed these Palestinians in response to the attack. It also reported that the army gave little information beyond their family link to the attackers' clan. The Palestinian Authority and B'Tselem called the removals collective punishment and forcible displacement.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “It is clear that these residents will return to their homes shortly”

    Why this matters
    The Post asserts as certain that the expelled residents will soon go home, and nothing in the article supports it.
    The impression it gives
    The removal is brief and harmless, with return already assured.
    The context
    No source in the article gives a return date. B'Tselem warned of forcible displacement and extensive unlawful destruction in Hebron, and the Post's earlier report described structures destroyed alongside the removals.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “demolitions that had already been planned and were unrelated to the terrorist attack”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice, with no attribution, the Post states that the Hebron demolitions had nothing to do with the attack.
    The impression it gives
    The demolitions were routine enforcement with no punitive link to the shooting.
    The context
    Finance Minister Smotrich said he ordered demolitions to exact a price for the attack. The Post itself reported structures destroyed in response to the attack. The claim is at best the army's contested account.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “This was not the work of a lone attacker, but rather an organized terrorist network”

    Why this matters
    The Post states as settled fact that an organised network with additional operatives was behind the attack.
    The impression it gives
    Investigators have established a wider Hamas network, which supports wider arrests and the collective measures in Hebron.
    The context
    The article itself says the investigation is still trying to determine what network assisted the attackers. The paper's own earlier report quoted the army saying no additional attackers were involved.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  4. Drops what it reported before

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says that the 2,000 people removed were targeted for their family link to the attackers' clan. It also omits that army sources could not say how many of them had any record. Without this, a reader accepts the protective explanation in S9 rather than seeing a mass measure against relatives.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  5. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article omits that the Palestinian Authority called the removals collective punishment. It also omits that B'Tselem warned of forcible displacement and unlawful destruction in Hebron. A reader sees only the army's and ministers' account of the measures.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 25 OctIDF seriously injures, fails to detain Palestinian accused of attempted ramming attack - report3.0
  2. 25 OctIDF seals off homes of terrorists who committed fatal Hebron attack ahead of intended demolition6.0
  3. 25 OctHospital delays, curfews as Israeli peace groups condemn displacements of Palestinians in Hebron8.2
  4. 25 OctThree Hebron residents arrested for online incitement to terrorism, support for Hamas6.0
  5. 25 OctIDF evacuates Israeli rioters after fire breaks out near Palestinian West Bank town7.3

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post