The Jerusalem Post, on West Bank, 25 October 2026

8.2out of 10Serious

Hospital delays, curfews as Israeli peace groups

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

The health and wellbeing of is being put at risk by the forced displacement being carried out in response to last week, multiple Israeli human rights organizations told The Jerusalem Post on Sunday.The IDF announced that its operation in the Al-Jaladah and Ein Deir Baha neighborhoods near the military checkpoint at the entrance to Hebron was aimed at locating terrorists and weapons and would include demolitions.

The Palestinian Authority condemned the operation as “collective punishment,” while Palestinian officials warned that it would have a significant impact on civilian life. Yousef Zouhair Al-Jabari, head of Hebron's municipality, told Reuters that around 1,300 additional people faced losing their homes, on top of the 1,200 already displaced. shops, factories, homes, and roads in Hebron.Milena Ansari, director of Physicians for Human Rights Israel's Palestinian Territory Department, told the Post that the effects of the latest operation were already being felt by sick and vulnerable residents.Palestinians fear displacement could be more long-termCiting the testimony of Osama Abu Sbeih, a Palestinian ambulance driver with the private Al-Salam Ambulance service in Hebron, PHRI reported multiple incidents in which patients were unable to reach critical medical care promptly, including a six-month-old baby suffering from a lung infection who had to wait two days to be transferred from a hospital in Ramallah to Hebron.“Crews are relying on passing patients from one ambulance to another at checkpoints.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article gives the army's stated aim of locating terrorists and weapons. It leaves out that Defence Minister Katz said the displaced would not be allowed back until "Hamas infrastructure" was dismantled, and that Netanyahu announced an offensive involving the displacement of Palestinians from their neighbourhoods. Without this, a reader believes the displacement is a by-product of a search, not a stated aim of the operation.

How we know

Even our mobile clinic that usually goes across the West Bank to provide medical treatment couldn't reach Msafaryatta for a scheduled medical day,” Ansari said. “But it's the long-term damage, which is a bit less visible but is as serious as what we're seeing right now on the ground.”Ansari shared her fears that the temporary displacement would become more long-term, and warned that the Palestinians housed in temporary shelters or in the crowded homes of relatives would be at risk.

Noting that many of the shelters lack proper heating, entering the winter months without proper housing could drive respiratory infections.For those with chronic conditions, she continued, the disruption to routine can create emergency situations. Patients with hypertension, diabetes and on dialysis might particularly struggle should these disruptions become long-term, she warned.“The psychological toll of being forced out of your home in the middle of the night, especially for the children…These psychological hardships last longer even after an operation ends,” Ansari shared.Israeli rights group tells IDF there's no link between demolitions and terror attackThe Association for Civil Rights in Israel, in a letter addressed to senior officials in the IDF, including IDF Central Command chief Maj.

Gen. Avi Bluth, seen by the Post, complained that there was no evidence of links between the houses being destroyed and the terrorists who carried out last week's attacks.ACRI also shared concern in response to the Palestinian claim that some of the displaced were removed from their home at night and left without shelter, that worshippers had been cut off from accessing the Ibrahimi mosque and that thousands were cut off from reaching work and school."No attack, however grave, gives the military license to punish an entire city.

Families who had nothing to do with the attack are being driven out and their homes demolished, while ministers present this to voters, a few days before the election, as the price Palestinians must pay. That is collective punishment. The military must stop it and let these families return home now, and ACRI will use every legal means available to make sure it does," said Noa Sattath, Executive Director of ACRI.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

The Jerusalem Post gives real space to Israeli rights groups and Palestinian officials on the harm done in Hebron. But in its own voice it calls the attackers terrorists on Israeli figures alone, and its headline leaves out who is displacing Palestinians. It never says the West Bank is occupied, and it writes that the mayor alleged demolitions the army itself had announced.

  1. Labels people on one side's word

    Serious

    “a terror attack carried out by two terrorists”

    Why this matters
    The Post calls the attack "a terror attack" and the two men "terrorists" in its own voice, with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established fact that the men were terrorists and the attack was terrorism.
    The context
    The only account of the attack comes from Israeli figures. Other outlets attribute it: two Palestinians attacked a checkpoint, two soldiers were killed, and both attackers were killed, all according to Israeli figures.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli forces displaced around 1,200 Palestinians after two Palestinians attacked a checkpoint last week, killing two soldiers, according to Israeli figures; both attackers were killed.

  2. Hides who did it

    Serious

    “condemn displacements of Palestinians in Hebron”

    Why this matters
    The headline reports "displacements of Palestinians" with no one doing the displacing.
    The impression it gives
    A reader of the headline learns that Palestinians were displaced but not that Israeli occupation forces forced them out.
    The context
    Israel's own defence minister acknowledged that Israeli forces displaced around 2,000 Palestinians in Hebron, and the article's body says the operation was the army's.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli peace groups condemn army's forced displacement of Palestinians in Hebron as patients face hospital delays.

  3. Hedges the documented record

    Serious

    “around 1200 Palestinian civilians in the West Bank”

    Why this matters
    The Post places the displacement "in the West Bank" and nowhere in the article calls the territory occupied.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is left without the legal status of the land where an army is forcing civilians from their homes, as if Israeli military rule over Hebron were unremarkable.
    The context
    The ICJ has found Israel's occupation of the West Bank unlawful. The forced displacement this article reports is carried out by an occupying army, and every other report of the same event says occupied West Bank.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Around 1,200 Palestinian civilians in Hebron, in the occupied West Bank, have been forced from their homes by Israeli occupation forces.

  4. Hedges a Palestinian account the army confirmed

    Minor

    “Al-Jabari alleged that the military had demolished”

    Why this matters
    The Post writes that the Hebron mayor "alleged" the military demolished buildings.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the demolitions as an unproven Palestinian claim.
    The context
    The army itself announced the operation would include demolitions, a point the Post reports as a plain announcement one sentence earlier.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“was aimed at locating terrorists and weapons and would include demolitions”

    Show it in the article

  5. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article gives the army's stated aim of locating terrorists and weapons. It leaves out that Defence Minister Katz said the displaced would not be allowed back until "Hamas infrastructure" was dismantled, and that Netanyahu announced an offensive involving the displacement of Palestinians from their neighbourhoods. Without this, a reader believes the displacement is a by-product of a search, not a stated aim of the operation.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 25 OctIDF seriously injures, fails to detain Palestinian accused of attempted ramming attack - report3.0
  2. 25 OctIDF seals off homes of terrorists who committed fatal Hebron attack ahead of intended demolition6.0
  3. 25 OctIDF pushing for Hebron attack to be classified as clash between soldiers, terrorists, not terror7.3
  4. 25 OctThree Hebron residents arrested for online incitement to terrorism, support for Hamas6.0
  5. 25 OctIDF evacuates Israeli rioters after fire breaks out near Palestinian West Bank town7.3

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post

See how 26 outlets covered this story