The Guardian, on UK Politics, 25 October 2026

The Guardian reports Andy Burnham's call for a debate on free movement and quotes both supporters and critics at length. It closes on a net migration peak of about 900,000 with no later figure, never using the words fell or declined, although net migration dropped by around three-quarters of a million between 2023 and 2025. It also asserts that polling shows voters warming to rejoining without naming a pollster, a figure or a date, and drops the limits Burnham set on his own position, which the Guardian itself reported the night before.

3.0

Minor

out of 10

What we found

  1. Uses figures that mislead

    Minor

    “net migration rose to a peak of about 900,000 in January 2020 under a new points-based system, up from 330,000 before the Brexit vote”

    What the words do
    Ends the article on a single peak figure of about 900,000 with no end date and no comparison after it, dating that peak to January 2020.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That net migration climbed to roughly 900,000 after Brexit and that this is where the number stands.
    What is actually the case
    Net migration fell by around three-quarters of a million between 2023 and 2025, so the peak the article quotes has since been reversed. The article never uses the words fell, fallen or declined anywhere, and gives no figure for any year after the peak. The Guardian's own report the previous night put the pre-referendum figure at 335,000 in the 12 months to June 2016.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Cites polling with no figure, date or pollster

    Minor

    “Polling suggests voters in the UK are increasingly open to rejoining the EU or a single market arrangement involving free movement.”

    What the words do
    States in the Guardian's own voice what polling shows, with no number, no fieldwork date, no pollster and no comparison point.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That there is established survey evidence of a shift in public opinion towards rejoining the EU and free movement.
    What is actually the case
    The article offers nothing a reader can check: no poll is named, no figure is given and no period is specified anywhere in the piece.

    Show it in the article

  3. Drops what it reported before

    Minor

    What is missing

    Burnham said he could not imagine recommending that the UK join the Schengen area or adopt the euro. The Guardian reported this limit the night before, and the Independent and the Express both carried it. Without it, a reader of this piece believes Burnham has put every form of EU reintegration on the table, which is the premise of the Farage and Badenoch attacks the article prints at length.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

Rayner backs Burnham call for debate on return to free movement with EU

Andy Burnham’s call for the UK to consider a return to free movement with Europe has been backed by senior cabinet ministers including Angela Rayner but risks causing concern among fellow red wall MPs. The prime minister made his plea for an “honest discussion” about free movement in an interview with the Sunday Times, making clear that staying out of it would no longer be a red line in talks with the EU. Burnham said: “Freedom of movement had very significant challenges associated with it and I spoke about them in my previous time in parliament. But, at the same time, it was a type of immigration that perhaps wasn’t as difficult [as now]. “Revolving-door migration where people would come and then go back is different. The balance of migration has changed, hasn’t it, since then? I think we’ve just got to have an honest discussion about those things.” His remarks were supported by Rayner, the housing secretary, who told Sky News that it was “just pragmatism”. She said: “It’s about what is the best deal for Britain and that’s what we are asking the public to look at. The prime minister is clear that you can’t take anything off the table when you’re having a conversation.” Stella Creasy, a Labour MP and the chair of the Labour Movement for Europe, said Burnham was right that the UK was “long overdue for a grownup conversation about what EU freedom of movement actually means to our supply chains and for jobs for British citizens”. View image in fullscreen Stella Creasy said the UK was ‘long overdue for a grown-up conversation about what EU freedom of movement means’. Photograph: Milo Chandler/Alamy A number of senior cabinet ministers are keen for the UK to form a much closer relationship with the EU to help boost growth, potentially involving a return to the single market and accepting free movement as a result. Those in favour of reopening the discussion include Ed Miliband, the foreign secretary. However, Shabana Mahmood , the home secretary, is among those who have been more cautious about the arguments. Mahmood told a New Statesman event at the Labour party conference that rejoining the EU would not be a “simple, straightforward thing” and there were “quite hard trade-offs”, such as eliminating trade friction without “some of the burdens that also brings”. A number of Labour MPs with heavily pro-Brexit seats in the so-called red wall in the north and Midlands are also wary about reopening the arguments for free movement or rejoining the EU. Those include Jonathan Hinder, the MP for Pendle, who recently pressed the prime minister in parliament to rule out a return to free movement. Concerns were raised on Sunday by Richard Walker, the Labour peer and executive chair of Iceland, who told Times Radio that restarting the debate would be a “dangerous precedent” and that opening the borders would not help the “one million young people that are out of work”. Burnham’s comments drew an immediate response from the right of politics, with the Conservatives and Reform UK criticising the idea of reopening the debate. Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, said the idea of reopening free movement was “another example of Burnham’s foot-in-mouth syndrome”. View image in fullscreen Kemi Badenoch said Burnham ‘hasn’t thought this through or the implications’. Photograph: Neil Hall/EPA She posted on social media: “He hasn’t thought this through or the implications. Most people who voted for Brexit did so because they didn’t want free movement. Too many politicians have failed to understand the significance and impact of immigration on communities. Reform UK plan to target EU nationals based in Britain ‘absolutely outrageous’ Read more “We have had more than enough experience of what happens when politicians, including previous Conservative governments, promise control but fail to deliver it. The answer is to learn from those mistakes, not reopen free movement.” Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, called it a “total betrayal of Brexit Britain and his Makerfield pitch”. “He is also deluded to say immigration was different when we were members of the EU. We will fight this dishonesty,” he added. The concept of free movement was that British and EU citizens could move freely within the bloc, which also shared a single market for goods and services. During the Brexit referendum, the topic was hotly debated, with the leave campaign arguing that the UK would be able to take control of its borders if it voted to exit the EU. However, in the years that followed, . Explore more on these topics Labour Andy Burnham Angela Rayner Stella Creasy Shabana Mahmood Foreign policy Brexit news Share Reuse this content

Read the original article on theguardian.com (opens in a new tab)

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Guardian

  1. 26 OctDrive reindustrialisation from No 10 North or risk failure, MPs tell Burnham0.0
  2. 26 OctBrexit deal is not good enough for British public, says Andy Burnham6.0
  3. 25 OctThe Guardian view on Oxford Street’s pedestrianisation: cities should be designed around people, not cars3.0
  4. 25 OctCutting ‘red tape’ is nothing but a red herring – and arguably counterproductive0.0
  5. 23 OctBriton facing forced separation from baby son after Sweden orders his deportation0.0

Everything we scored from The Guardian