Tehran Times, on Iran, 3 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Gharibabadi: Iran ready for any scenario as diplomatic exchanges with US continue

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Gharibabadi: Iran ready for any scenario as diplomatic exchanges with US continue

TEHRAN — Iran is prepared for any eventuality as diplomatic exchanges with the United States continue through mediators, Deputy Foreign Minister for Legal and International Affairs Kazem Gharibabadi said on Tuesday, stressing that Tehran remains ready to defend itself against further aggression while pursuing a diplomatic solution.

Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of a ceremony unveiling annual reports on human rights violations in the United States and Britain, Gharibabadi said communications through mediators were ongoing, with serving as the basis for resolving outstanding issues through Qatar’s mediation.

He said Tehran had received responses to the proposal and that a diplomatic understanding could be reached if Iran’s requirements were met.

Gharibabadi stressed that Iran had neither sought nor initiated the war imposed on the country. If Washington was serious about pursuing a diplomatic solution, it must adhere to the conditions Iran had clearly outlined, he said.

Referring to incidents reported on Qeshm Island on Monday night, the deputy foreign minister said Iran remained in a state of war and considered the aggression against it ongoing. He described this as an important legal point, emphasizing that Iran retained its right to legitimate self-defense until the military aggression had ended completely and permanently.

Reaffirming Tehran’s commitment to negotiations, Gharibabadi said Iran was pursuing diplomacy with full awareness of the lack of trust in the United States. He warned that if Washington chose another course, Iran would respond resolutely to defend itself.

He also said Iran did not link its foreign policy to elections in other countries, describing the US midterm elections as an internal matter for Washington. Tehran was neither waiting for the outcome nor adjusting its policies accordingly, he added.

Iran questions US and British human rights record

At the same ceremony, Gharibabadi said the United States and Britain lacked the legitimacy to comment on human rights, citing widespread violations of the rights of their own citizens and people in other countries.

The annual reports, prepared by the Foreign Ministry in accordance with a resolution passed by the Iranian Parliament, examine human rights developments in both countries from September of last year through the current year. The report on the United States is more detailed, he said.

Gharibabadi said both governments must be held accountable by the international community and their own populations for human rights violations. He rejected any suggestion that Britain’s record was less serious than that of the United States, saying Washington was at the forefront of human rights violations worldwide.

He pointed to abuses involving prisoners’ rights, freedom of expression, discrimination and racism, the treatment of immigrants, poverty and inequality in the United States.

The deputy foreign minister also criticized Washington’s withdrawal from the Human Rights Council, saying it had done so in defense of the Israeli regime. He argued that the United States was increasingly evading accountability as its human rights violations mounted.

Gharibabadi said the reports were being released at a time when the United States continued to violate human rights in its dealings with independent nations, while Britain committed widespread abuses despite presenting itself as a champion of human rights.

He said the two countries should address their own records before presuming to lecture others on human rights.

Read the original article on tehrantimes.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Tehran Times reports a deputy foreign minister's remarks on talks with the US and on the US and British human rights record, and attributes his claims to him throughout. It calls Iran's plan a "seven-day proposal", where same-day coverage describes the basis of the Qatar-mediated talks as a seven-point plan.

  1. Makes a false claim

    Minor

    “Iran’s seven-day proposal”

    Why this matters
    The words "seven-day proposal" describe the basis of the Qatar-mediated talks as a proposal defined by a number of days.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes Iran's offer to be a seven-day plan or a proposal with a seven-day timeframe.
    The context
    Same-day coverage describes it as Tehran's seven-point plan to end the war, submitted in September. The plan covers ending the naval blockade, reopening the Strait of Hormuz, oil sales and lifting sanctions. Nothing in it is a seven-day timeframe.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “Deputy Foreign Minister for Legal and International Affairs Kazem Gharibabadi said on Tuesday”

    The outlet names the official and his post, so readers know whose claims follow.

  • “Gharibabadi stressed that Iran had neither sought nor initiated the war imposed on the country”

    A contested claim about how the war began is attributed to the minister rather than stated in the outlet's own voice.

  • “saying it had done so in defense of the Israeli regime”

    The term "Israeli regime" and the motive given for the US withdrawal are kept inside the minister's reported speech, not put in the outlet's voice.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Tehran Times

  1. 3 NovBaqaei: US nuclear allegations are a pretext for pressure against Iran0.0
  2. 2 NovIran rejects uranium transfer abroad, says Hormuz reopening depends on US ending blockade3.0
  3. 2 NovNo stable security can emerge without Iran 3.0
  4. 2 NovPolice chief warns enemy interests worldwide could be targeted in future war0.0
  5. 2 NovTop judge calls for expedited, thorough judicial proceedings into US crimes against Iran3.0

Everything we scored from Tehran Times