City AM, on UK Politics, 4 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Marks & Spencer boss accuses Labour of ‘biggest tax grab in history’

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Marks & Spencer boss Stuart Machin has accused the government of mounting “one of the biggest tax grabs in history” in a scathing attack on Labour’s efforts to boost economic growth. The retail boss told reporters that the three Budgets since Labour came to power have resulted in about £73bn in extra taxes, claiming the government has failed to deliver on its pledge to boost economic growth. He said: “When you look at the last three Budgets, you can’t just ignore the fact that this is probably one of the biggest tax grabs in history that I’ve seen.”

Machin described last week’s Budget as “a whole lot of nothing”. He said M&S were “disappointed” by Healey’s first major act as Chancellor “because it didn’t really address the issues that we needed to focus on growth”. Though the Budget was billed as a “do no harm” event, Machin said that the Chancellor’s announcement on business rates will add another £10m pounds on top of the £170m its firm already pays annually. Retailers criticised Healey for claiming to freeze the business rates bills of all high street firms despite the fact that these taxes will still rise with inflation.

Machin said: “We know all of the headwinds that we’ve seen from [the] government. […] The extra costs from the Budget in ‘24 added another £150m to our cost base, and actually, when you look at things coming down the road, I can’t see that getting any better. “Just in April, this new packaging tax, which we were told was meant to help cancel councils and reinvest in recycling, but the previous Chancellor admitted it was just a tax for the Treasury.

Just in one month, we paid £40m out of our food margin.” Stockpiling order ‘worried’ shoppers The M&S boss also accused the government of worsening Brits’ consumer confidence, which suffered its steepest decline in a decade in September, according to GfK. He criticised the government’s recently-published advice for shoppers to stockpile three days’ worth of supplies, which grocers said had caught them by surprise. Machin said: “Everything is pointing to people saying ‘we’re worried about cost of living, we’re worried about the headwinds’, and of course they are being told to worry as well.

“The stockpiling announcement a couple of weeks ago, when you get told by the government to stockpile, everyone sits there and says: ‘well, you’re telling me to worry about something.” Ahead of the Budget, Machin urged the Chancellor to adopt six policies to “get Britain growing by taking the handcuffs off business and putting money back in people’s pockets”. These included cutting packaging taxes and rolling back hikes to employment costs.

Machin said the Treasury ignored five of these points, though he praised the government’s progress towards a deal to remove post-Brexit checks on food and agriculture exports. The existing checks make it “very problematic” for M&S to transfer stock to its stores in the Republic of Ireland, he said. Machin claimed a deal to re-align food standards with the European Union would be a “big win”. On Wednesday, Marks & Spencer posted a £355m pre-tax profit as double-digit growth in its food arm helped the retailer continue its recovery from last year’s cyber attack.

But the group warned that its fashion, home and beauty business is still in the “foothills” of its comeback.

Read the original article on cityam.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

City AM reports the Marks & Spencer chief executive's attack on Labour's Budgets. In its own voice it states that the business rates rise will add £250m in costs for retailers next year, and it gives no source for that figure.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “The 3.5 per cent hike will add £250m in costs for retailers next year.”

    Why this matters
    City AM states the £250m cost to retailers in its own voice, with no source, directly after reporting retailers' criticism of the Chancellor.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the £250m figure as an established, checked fact.
    The context
    The article gives no source for the figure. It sits inside a passage built on retailers' complaints, so it reads as their estimate dressed as the outlet's fact.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Retailers criticised Healey for claiming to freeze”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from City AM

  1. 4 NovThe parliamentary bill that could speed up the FCA0.0
  2. 4 NovShabana Mahmood has caved to her party’s worst instincts on immigration6.0
  3. 4 NovBritain does not owe the Caribbean reparations for slavery6.0
  4. 4 NovIs Labour wants risk-takers, why is it cutting incentives?0.0
  5. 4 Nov‘Punished in every way’: British firms say they’ll be worse off after the Budget3.0

Everything we scored from City AM