Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on Iran, 27 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Trump on Iran war: We had no choice, we didn’t start the war

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

US President Donald Trump defended the American military campaign against Iran during an election rally in Mississippi on Monday, arguing that Tehran's expanding missile capabilities and nuclear ambitions left Washington with no alternative but to act. Addressing supporters, Trump acknowledged Iran's technological capabilities while emphasizing the damage inflicted on its military by American forces. "Iranians make great weapons. They are very smart people, but we beat the s--t out of them," the President stated, adding, "Iranians now have a missile that essentially reached Europe.

They weren’t supposed to. We said, 'Where the hell did they get that?'" Trump warned that Iran's missile development could eventually pose a direct threat to major American population centers, including cities on the West Coast. "And they'd hit our cities. They’d hit San Diego. They’d hit Los Angeles. They'd hit our cities too. So somebody had to do it. It had to be done," Trump stated. “We didn’t start the war with Iran. ," he added.

The President also criticized an earlier ceasefire with Iran, saying he had opposed the arrangement and believed it had delayed necessary action. "We did a little ceasefire, which I never liked very much. I considered it a waste of time. The ceasefire was just a waste of time, but you like to listen to professionals. We wanted to be nice, but it was just a waste of time as far as I'm concerned," he continued. Trump maintained that military intervention was necessary to prevent the Islamic Republic from acquiring nuclear weapons, even if the operation resulted in higher global energy prices.

He said "we really had no choice" and acknowledged that he had anticipated a potentially significant increase in oil prices as a consequence of the conflict. "I thought the price of oil was going to go much, much higher, and I was fully prepared to do it...it should've been a long time ago." The President also pointed to Iran's history of hostility toward the United States, dating back to the Islamic Revolution in 1979, and accused Tehran of responsibility for American deaths over the decades.

“They were killing our people for years," Trump said. The remarks came amid continued uncertainty over whether the United States would launch another round of military strikes against Iran, an option Trump has been considering in recent weeks. On Saturday, the President declined to disclose whether he was preparing to authorize additional attacks when questioned by reporters. Trump nevertheless confirmed that renewed military action remained under consideration, while indicating that a negotiated agreement with Tehran was also possible.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article presents the uncertainty over new US strikes, and Trump's 'There will not be a strike today', as a matter between Washington and Tehran alone. It leaves out that reporting the same day said Trump has held off before the November midterms, and that Netanyahu has been pushing for a joint strike while Trump asked Israel to wait. Without this, the reader believes the timing turns only on Iran.

How we know

"Let me tell you, while we're thinking about doing it, and maybe tomorrow, do you really think I'm going to tell you? If I'm going to do it, and there's a possibility I will, there's also a possibility we'll have a nice, big, beautiful agreement. They want to make a deal. But the problem is, will they hold the deal?" On Sunday, Trump ruled out an American strike that day while speaking to reporters before departing for an election rally in Michigan.

“The answer is no. There will not be a strike today," he stated. Later, during an interview with FOX2 Detroit , Trump stressed that his priority was ensuring Iran never obtained nuclear weapons, rather than securing a rapid conclusion to the conflict. “You want to see problems? You want to see not only energy problems but death problems? Let them have a nuclear weapon because they will use it," Trump said. “And, I have to do that first."

He also signaled that he was willing to continue negotiations for as long as necessary to achieve an agreement that addressed the Iranian nuclear threat. “I’m going to make a great deal. I’m a longterm person; I’m not a short term person," the President said.

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Arutz Sheva reports Trump's rally remarks on Iran and marks most of them as his. It lets his claim that Iran started the war close his justification and lead the headline with nothing against it, and never says the war began at the end of February with a US-Israeli campaign. It also leaves out same-day reporting on Israeli pressure for a joint strike and the election timing.

  1. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “Iran started the war with us”

    Why this matters
    Arutz Sheva closes Trump's justification passage with his words "Iran started the war with us" and sets nothing against them. The headline repeats the claim.
    The impression it gives
    The reader comes away believing Iran began the war and the US only responded.
    The context
    The claim is contested. Other coverage describes a US-Israeli campaign against Iran, and Iranian officials reject the claim outright. The outlet itself reported that the war began at the end of February. The article never says when or how the war began, or that Israel took part.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article presents the uncertainty over new US strikes, and Trump's 'There will not be a strike today', as a matter between Washington and Tehran alone. It leaves out that reporting the same day said Trump has held off before the November midterms, and that Netanyahu has been pushing for a joint strike while Trump asked Israel to wait. Without this, the reader believes the timing turns only on Iran.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 26 OctSaudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan hold high-level talks with Iran0.0
  2. 26 OctReport: Hezbollah rebuilding military capabilities with Iranian funding9.1
  3. 26 OctKatz: Israel never planned pre-election strike on Iran7.3
  4. 26 OctCENTCOM chief declares: Strait of Hormuz is free from Iranian mines3.0
  5. 26 OctTrump on Iran: I’m going to make a great deal3.0

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News