Al-Monitor, on Iran, 23 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Turkey says renewed attack on Iran would expand conflict, diplomacy only way

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

ISTANBUL, Oct 23 (Reuters) - Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan cautioned on Friday against any renewed attack on Iran, saying such a move would exacerbate tensions and further expand the conflict there, adding that diplomacy and dialogue were the only way to end the war. Fidan met his counterparts from Egypt, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Germany, France, Britain and Italy in Istanbul to discuss developments in the Iran war, attacks on Saudi Arabia by , and Russia's war in Ukraine.

It was the first collective meeting between the countries, comprising the Regional Four (R4) and EU 3 (E3), alongside Italy. "We are all in agreement that a new attack on Iran would expand the war in the region," Fidan told a press conference after the meeting. "A military intervention on Iran is not in any way a solution. Nobody approves this at the moment," he added. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said after Friday's meetings that renewed escalation between Iran and the United States would only have losers and raise oil prices.

The comments followed a New York Times report on Wednesday that the US and Israeli militaries had drawn up specific plans for renewed strikes against Iran after the US midterm congressional election next month. Citing US officials, it said likely targets would include Iran's energy infrastructure, nuclear facilities, and its missile and drone arsenal. US President Donald Trump said earlier this month that the US would not launch an attack on Iran before the midterms, as Washington and Tehran were having "productive" talks about ending .On Friday, he said the US could end the war quickly but questioned whether Washington should seek a swift conclusion or allow the conflict to gradually wind down.

NATO member Turkey has been in close contact with Washington, Tehran and regional mediators to seek an end to the war. It has repeatedly called for attacks to stop and warned against the regional expansion of the conflict. Fidan also said the countries meeting on Friday had discussed possible parameters to ensure the war in Iran does not expand further, but did not elaborate. Following Friday's meetings, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said Germany, France, and Britain were ready to negotiate with Iran to rule out its acquisition of nuclear weapons, while calling for support for Saudi Arabia and Yemen. (Reporting by Tuvan Gumrukcu, Editing by Humeyra Pamuk and Timothy Heritage)

Read the original article on al-monitor.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Al-Monitor runs a Reuters report on a meeting of foreign ministers in Istanbul where Turkey warned against renewed attacks on Iran. It attributes its claims carefully and names the US and Israeli militaries as the ones planning new strikes. Its faults are minor: it calls the Houthis 'Iran-backed' militants in its own voice, and it gives the war's age as six months when its own earlier report said eight.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Iran-backed Houthi militants”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the outlet calls the Houthis "Iran-backed" and "militants", with no source for either label.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as settled that the Houthis are a militant force backed by Iran, rather than reading a described relationship.
    The context
    Neither label is attributed to anyone in the article. The outlet's own earlier report used the plainer "Iran-aligned Houthis". Under the standard, the Iran link should be given as a sourced fact.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses figures that mislead

    Minor

    “their six-month-old war”

    Why this matters
    The outlet gives the war's age as six months.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the war between the US and Iran began about six months ago.
    The context
    Three days earlier the same outlet, also running Reuters, called it "the countries' eight-month-old war". Its own reporting contradicts the figure.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “the US and Israeli militaries had drawn up specific plans for renewed strikes against Iran”

    The article names who is planning the strikes rather than writing them as an abstract threat of escalation.

  • “Citing US officials, it said likely targets would include”

    The target list is attributed to the New York Times and its US sources, not stated in the outlet's own voice.

  • “German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said”

    The nuclear weapons language is clearly marked as Wadephul's statement, not the outlet's own claim.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Al-Monitor

  1. 24 OctIran has ramped up efforts to target US personnel, intelligence memo warns3.0
  2. 24 OctFrom Hormuz to data centers: How Iran’s threats are raising stakes of renewed war3.0
  3. 23 OctSigns point to renewed major US military ops against Iran3.0
  4. 23 OctIran has detailed plans to hit Gulf undersea cables if war resumes, officials say3.0
  5. 23 OctShip attacks in Strait of Hormuz hit record high in October3.0

Everything we scored from Al-Monitor