Al-Monitor, on Iran, 23 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Signs point to renewed major US military ops against Iran

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

The United States appears to be preparing to resume large-scale strikes against Iran, but there is unlikely to be a military solution for either side in the devastating conflict, . Washington and Tehran's forces have settled into a pattern of strikes on commercial ships, with the United States seeking to enforce a blockade of Iran's ports and the Islamic republic trying to exert control over the key Strait of Hormuz waterway.

Neither country has engaged in major attacks on land-based targets since early September, but that may soon change. "I'm banking now on the likelihood of strikes shortly after the midterms," said Suzanne Maloney, director of the foreign policy program at the Brookings Institution, referring to November 3 elections in the United States. She pointed to potential signs including the movement of additional US military assets and troops to the Middle East, warnings issued to Americans in the region, and a high alert status for Israeli forces.

Additionally, President Donald Trump "came out publicly and said that he wouldn't strike before the midterms," and "it wouldn't seem to help him at the polls to do so," Maloney said. The US-Israeli war against Iran -- launched in late February -- is largely unpopular in the United States, especially because it has sharply driven up fuel prices, and is likely to be a drag on Trump's Republican Party in the key vote. "Fundamentally, the situation isn't sustainable in its current state," Maloney said, noting that the US blockade is "creating greater pain for the Iranians," while Washington has a large number of naval assets tied up in enforcing it.

"There has to be some kind of a resolution, either through diplomacy or through military action," she said. Asked about the Iran on Friday, Trump told journalists that "we could end it very quickly," but said the question is "do we want to finish it off, or... do we just want to let it wither?" Tom Barrack, the US ambassador to Turkey and special envoy for Syria and Iraq, meanwhile said Friday that there could "absolutely" be a strike this weekend, ahead of Tuesday's Israeli elections. - 'Impossible to predict' - Jason Campbell, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, said there have "certainly been recent signs that renewed strikes may be in the offing," or that "the US is expecting strikes carried out by Iran" or their Houthi allies in Yemen.

He noted the planned deployment of the USS Theodore Roosevelt to the Middle East -- which could at least temporarily bring the number of carrier strike groups there to three -- as well as the decision to dispatch another Marine Expeditionary Unit to the region. Campbell also said Israeli warplanes recently carried out a "show of force" mimicking previous strikes on Iran, and noted that US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had met with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel.

However, "timing here is impossible to predict," he said of renewed strikes, while noting that "this is admittedly an expansive set of actions to take if the intent is to simply pressure Iran to the negotiating table." Campbell said Trump's options are more limited than they were earlier in the conflict, with damage to US bases in the region having made any potential ground operation more difficult. "At this point, there is no safe place to stage the thousands (in some scenarios tens of thousands) of forces that would be required for such an operation," he said.

Maloney meanwhile said that "most of the conventional military sites (in Iran) have already been heavily degraded" by previous strikes, meaning any new campaign will likely "entail more strikes on civilian infrastructure and targets that impact the Iranian population." But that -- or any type of military action -- is unlikely to bring about a resolution to the conflict. "From the start... this has been a war that can't be ended with further escalation on either side," Maloney said.

Campbell agreed, saying: "I do not see how renewed strikes on Iran akin to the first fifty days of the war will move the strategic needle for the Iranian regime." "They have demonstrated a willingness to absorb a significant amount of physical pain and even some alterations to targeting that includes key mixed or even civilian infrastructure will not significantly change this," he added. wd/sms

Read the original article on al-monitor.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Al-Monitor reports signs that the US is preparing to resume large-scale strikes on Iran after the midterms. It names the US-Israeli war as launched in late February and keeps attribution on its sources' claims. Its only weakness is minor: the whole analysis comes from two Washington think-tank experts, and Iran appears only as a target and never as a voice.

  1. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “experts say”

    Why this matters
    The words "experts say" present the article's reading of the war as general expert judgement. Every expert quoted is from a Washington think tank.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the assessment of US plans and Iran's likely response as a rounded expert view. The reader hears nothing from Iran about how it would answer renewed strikes.
    The context
    Both experts are from US institutions, and no Iranian official or analyst is quoted anywhere in the article. Coverage of the same event reports Iranian officials setting out a prepared response.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “The US-Israeli war against Iran -- launched in late February”

    The outlet names who started the war in its own voice rather than writing it as a conflict that simply broke out.

  • “with the United States seeking to enforce a blockade of Iran's ports”

    The outlet names the US as the party enforcing the blockade instead of hiding the actor.

  • “entail more strikes on civilian infrastructure and targets that impact the Iranian population”

    The article keeps in view what a new campaign would mean for Iranian civilians, not only for military targets.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Al-Monitor

  1. 24 OctIran has ramped up efforts to target US personnel, intelligence memo warns3.0
  2. 24 OctFrom Hormuz to data centers: How Iran’s threats are raising stakes of renewed war3.0
  3. 23 OctIran has detailed plans to hit Gulf undersea cables if war resumes, officials say3.0
  4. 23 OctTurkey says renewed attack on Iran would expand conflict, diplomacy only way3.0
  5. 23 OctShip attacks in Strait of Hormuz hit record high in October3.0

Everything we scored from Al-Monitor