Daily Express, on Climate, 23 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Andy Burnham urged to axe ban on petrol cars as official consultation ends

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Andy Burnham urged to axe ban on petrol cars as official consultation ends Car makers have warned the planned new rule is costing jobs Share Article Share Article Facebook X LinkedIn Reddit Bluesky Email Copy Link Link copied Add us as preferred source Comments By Jonathan Walker , Whitehall Editor 14:03, Fri, Oct 23, 2026 Updated: 14:06, Fri, Oct 23, 2026 Andy Burnham gets out of his car during a visit (Image: Getty) Andy Burnham has been urged to listen to the voices of manufacturers as a consultation on banning the sale of new petrol and diesel cars officially closed.

Ministers are considering watering down the ban , after manufacturers warned it was putting jobs at risk. The Department for Transport will now consider responses from motorists, car makers and other businesses. Conservative Shadow Transport Secretary Richard Holden called for the policy to be scrapped entirely. He said: “Britain makes great hybrid, petrol, diesel and electric cars. It should be up to consumers, not the state, what they are able to buy.

The EU and US have both scrapped their plans to ban diesel and electric cars and vans." Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT The 9 items Brits must stockpile after new warning Households told to stockpile food, water and medicine in new warning Get the latest politics news - straight from our team in Westminster and more I would like to receive emails from the Daily Express featuring our latest products, services, offers, and promotions from across the Reach Plc family .

Subscribe Invalid email You agree you are 18 or over. We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. You can unsubscribe at any time. More Info . Mr Holden added: “So rather than tinkering at the edges, and spending billions of taxpayers’ money funding foreign companies to pay foreign workers to make electric cars, the Labour Government should adopt the Conservatives ' drive-train neutral approach and let families and small businesses choose for themselves what vehicle is right for them and, in the process, save taxpayers billions as well as the British automotive sector.”

Mr Burnham has so far refused to back down over a planned ban on the sale of new fully petrol or diesel cars from 2030, and new hybrid vehicles from 2035. However, the Government consultation looked at whether to relax before those dates. Under the Government’s Zero Emission Mandate (ZEV), vehicle manufacturers in the UK must already ensure 33% of new cars are electric, and face fines if they fail to comply.

This is set to rise steadily to 80% by 2030. Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT Car makers have warned that drivers are reluctant to buy electric vehicles, and the industry spends £5billion every year providing discounts. The automotive sector, which employs almost 800,000 people, including 156,000 directly in manufacturing, has said this is unsustainable, and jobs are at risk. Firms include Jaguar Land Rover, with plants in the West Midlands and Merseyside, and Nissan, a major employer in the North-east.

Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT Possible changes to be considered by the Government include reducing the target to 50% of new cars being fully electric by 2030. This would allow more hybrid vehicles to be sold, although the total ban on hybrids after 2035 would remain. . Union leaders last month said the ban was partly to blame for Jaguar Land Rover’s announcement that it was axing 4,000 roles.

Sharon Graham, general secretary of trade union Unite, said: “Years of under-investment, unsustainable ZEV mandates and high industrial energy costs are crippling the industry. There must be further action.” Transport minister Simon Lightwood said: “No policy decisions have been made yet regarding the trajectories of the ZEV Mandate. We are seeking views on whether a revised approach to the existing mandate trajectories is warranted. The Government remains committed to the 2030 and 2035 phase-out dates, and they are not subject to change.”

Andy Burnham Petrol Share Article Share Article Facebook X LinkedIn Reddit Bluesky Email Copy Link Link copied Add us as preferred source Comments

Read the original article on express.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Express describes the electric car mandate only as tough rules that cost jobs and limit choice, and never says it exists to cut emissions from road transport. Opponents of the mandate get direct quotes and detailed arguments, while its supporters appear in a single unquoted line.

  1. Presents climate policy as pure cost

    Minor

    “tough rules designed to reduce sales of petrol and hybrid cars”

    Why this matters
    The Express says the rules are designed to reduce sales of petrol and hybrid cars. It never says what cutting those sales is meant to achieve.
    The impression it gives
    A reader sees a policy that costs jobs and limits choice and has no stated benefit.
    The context
    The mandate exists to cut carbon emissions from road transport, and cutting emissions is what limits further warming. The article never mentions the climate or carbon once.

    How we know

    • On the recordCutting greenhouse gas emissions is what limits further warming, and every increment of warming avoided reduces harm.ipcc.ch (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

  2. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “Any attempt to water down the measure would be opposed by some environmental campaigners and businesses involved in providing electric chargepoint infrastructure”

    Why this matters
    The Express mentions supporters of the mandate in one unquoted line. The Conservative spokesman, the car makers and the Unite leader all get direct quotes or detailed arguments.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the case against the mandate as the main view, with the other side reduced to a passing mention.
    The context
    No campaigner or chargepoint business is quoted or given a reason, so the reader never hears why anyone backs the mandate.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the Labour Government should adopt the Conservatives ' drive-train neutral approach”
    • Elsewhere in the article“unsustainable ZEV mandates and high industrial energy costs are crippling the industry”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Express

  1. 23 OctCornwall beach fight breaks out after family ignore red flag warning during Storm Austen3.0
  2. 23 OctMet Office urges homes in 34 areas to gather torches and batteries for 24 hours - list0.0
  3. 23 OctChester Zoo closed on Friday 'to keep everyone safe' as Storm Austen hits3.0
  4. 23 OctMet Office issues 24-hour 'danger to life' warning for 34 areas as Storm Boelo to hit3.0
  5. 23 Oct'Deadliest summer on record' left 50,000 dead across Europe in 20260.0

Everything we scored from Daily Express