A US soldier was arrested by counterterrorism police in the UK on charges of spying for Russia, on Tuesday. The 41-year-old senior serviceman was arrested near Gloucester on Tuesday and is being held on suspicion of violating the National Security Act 2023, specifically for disclosing protected information to foreign intelligence services. Counterterrorism police raided two properties in the area as part of the investigation. The soldier was stationed at Imjin Barracks, which serves as the headquarters of NATO's Allied Rapid Reaction Corps (ARRC).
Police said the investigation was not linked to any other ongoing investigations. FBI Director Kash Patel said in a statement: "This important arrest involves allegations of espionage, which is of the utmost concern to the United States and our allies." "While this investigation is continuing, I want to send a clear message – this FBI has no tolerance for anyone who breaks their oath to the United States and whose actions endanger our national security and that of our partners."
Egypt permanently places Muslim Brotherhood on terrorist list Suggested articles Israeli soldier charged with passing sensitive military information to Iranian operatives | i24NEWS Former Germany BND chief Hanning arrested on suspicion of espionage | i24NEWS Two Ashkelon residents indicted for spying on behalf of Iranian intelligence | i24NEWS
i24News reports the arrest of a 41-year-old US soldier near Gloucester on suspicion of spying for Russia. Its opening sentence says he was arrested "on charges of" spying, which turns a suspicion into a formal charge. Its own headline, its next sentence and other outlets all say he was held on suspicion only. The rest of the report attributes its details to police and the FBI and does not mislead.
Makes a false claim
Serious
“on charges of spying for Russia”
Why this matters
The words "on charges of" tell the reader the soldier has been formally charged with spying for Russia.
The impression it gives
A reader of the opening line believes prosecutors have already brought espionage charges against the soldier.
The context
He was arrested and held on suspicion. No charge had been brought. The article's own headline and its next sentence say so, and the Metropolitan Police statement reported by Al Jazeera describes an arrest on suspicion of offences under the National Security Act 2023.
How we know
Elsewhere in the article“is being held on suspicion of violating the National Security Act 2023”
In the headline“arrested in UK on suspicion of spying for Russia”