Middle East Eye, on Iran, 15 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Gulf states have downplayed damage caused by Iranian strikes: Report

Findings are available in the analysis below.1 finding

Arabian Gulf monarchies have “suppressed” information about the extent of damage done to their physical infrastructure by attacks from Iran and its allies, Reuters reported on Thursday. Gulf states such as Qatar , the UAE , Bahrain , and Kuwait faced thousands of missile and drone strikes launched by Iran in retaliation for the US-Israeli attack on the Islamic Republic that began on 28 February. More recently, Saudi Arabia has come under attack from the Houthis in Yemen.

The Houthis and Iran targeted civilian infrastructure like pipelines, energy facilities and, in one case, a nuclear energy plant. Reuters' assessment is likely to cast new doubt on how Gulf states describe strikes on their territories. For example, Saudi Arabia’s energy ministry said that a Houthi drone strike caused a "limited fire" at the headquarters of the kingdom's national oil company, Aramco, in Dhahran. But Reuters reported on Wednesday that the headquarters suffered “extensive damage”.

New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters One source said the top three floors of Aramco’s headquarters, including the office of Aramco CEO Amin Nasser, were severely damaged, with part of the ceiling caved in and windows and doors blown out. Since the war on Iran began, Reuters said that overall there has been a discrepancy between how Gulf states explain the damage and the reality on the ground.

Sophisticated targeting The Gulf states have acknowledged strikes on their territories but say that damage was caused by falling debris, when in fact, satellite imagery and experts have said it was extensive and underscored sophisticated targeting. In the UAE, an electrical substation roof at the Barakah nuclear energy plant was struck, forcing one of its four reactors to use emergency diesel generators. Iran had the plant’s floor plan and the location of the electrical substation, an Iranian official and two officials in the Gulf told Reuters.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

MEE never says that Reuters itself could not always establish how well Gulf air defences worked or the full extent of the damage without visiting the sites. Without this caveat, the article's talk of 'the reality on the ground' reads as fully established when Reuters was more qualified about some sites.

How we know

Likewise, Iran’s attack on Qatar’s Ras Laffan liquefied natural gas facility revealed sophisticated targeting. The strike hit “cold boxes” that house cooling equipment needed to liquefy gas. The equipment takes months to build. Houthi strikes mark the end of Saudi Arabia's Yemen 'containment strategy' Read More » Perhaps no facility underscores the mismatch between how Gulf states characterised attacks on their facilities and the reality on the ground like Iran’s targeting of the UAE port of Fujairah.

Iran hit the port multiple times, targeting critical infrastructure, at times after the UAE had repaired it, Reuters said. The first strike on Fujairah came on 3 March, causing two storage tanks to burn for days. A second strike on the port hit a matrix manifold, a transfer system of 62 pipelines that feeds crude oil and finished petroleum products from oil terminals to shipping berths, Reuters reported, citing satellite data. Emirati officials blamed the two strikes on falling debris, but Reuters said that this explanation did not match damage assessments.

Ramanan Krishnamoorti, a petroleum engineering professor at the University of Houston, said the UAE’s official explanation stretched credibility: “This is a wound to the brain and heart” for the UAE. Follow-up strikes on Fujairah in March hit the port’s other matrix manifold, Reuters reported. The UAE worked quickly to repair Fujairah, a critical port for oil exports. The UAE appeared to have made the port fully operational by the end of March, but it was attacked by Iran again in May, with a drone hitting pipes leading to the first matrix manifold attacked in March.

Reuters reported that refined petroleum product exports from the port did not recover until September. Copyright © 2014 - 2026 . Middle East Eye. All rights reserved. Only England and Wales jurisdiction apply in all legal matters. Middle East Eye ISSN 2634-2456

Read the original article on middleeasteye.net (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Middle East Eye summarises a Reuters investigation finding that Gulf states played down the damage Iranian and Houthi strikes did to their infrastructure. It attributes the key claims to Reuters, names who started the war, and sets Gulf officials' statements against Reuters' findings. The one gap is minor: MEE drops Reuters' own caveat that it could not always confirm the full extent of the damage without visiting the sites.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    MEE never says that Reuters itself could not always establish how well Gulf air defences worked or the full extent of the damage without visiting the sites. Without this caveat, the article's talk of 'the reality on the ground' reads as fully established when Reuters was more qualified about some sites.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “in retaliation for the US-Israeli attack on the Islamic Republic that began on 28 February”

    MEE names who started the war and when, so the reader knows Iran's strikes followed a US-Israeli attack and are not an opening move.

  • “attacks from Iran and its allies”

    MEE writes 'allies' where Reuters writes 'proxies', and so avoids flattening Iran-aligned groups into actors doing someone else's bidding.

  • “But Reuters reported on Wednesday that the headquarters suffered “extensive damage”.”

    MEE gives the Saudi ministry's 'limited fire' account and then sets Reuters' finding directly against it, each attributed to its source.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Middle East Eye

  1. 26 OctMecca alliance visits Tehran in push to end Israeli-US war and build regional security3.0
  2. 25 OctIran warns of ‘unimaginable’ response to US aggression as tensions rise over Hormuz3.0
  3. 23 Oct'Escalation is coming': Middle East on edge as new Israeli-US attack on Iran looms0.0
  4. 19 OctUAE government-linked jet lands in Tehran as regional tensions rise0.0
  5. 16 OctUS weighs lifting sanctions on Iran's 'shadow fleet' to address surging costs3.0

Everything we scored from Middle East Eye