Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on Gaza, 26 October 2026

Arutz Sheva reports a UN commission's finding of extermination and continuing genocide, but writes the genocide finding as allegation and characterisation that Israel rejects, though its own next sentence calls it a determination. In its own voice it calls the occupied West Bank Judea and Samaria, settlers Jewish residents and settlements Jewish communities, and labels the army's West Bank operation counterterrorism.

NewsCord staff selected this article for review and pointed the model at passages to examine. Every finding quotes the article.

8.7

Severe

out of 10

What we found

  1. Hedges the documented record

    Severe

    “renewing its allegations of genocide in the Gaza Strip”

    What the words do
    The outlet calls the commission's genocide finding "allegations" in its own voice.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the genocide in Gaza is an unproven accusation, not a finding.
    What is actually the case
    The UN Commission of Inquiry found in September 2025 that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza. Other outlets report it as a finding.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “an allegation Israel has consistently rejected”

    What the words do
    The outlet ends the sentence on the genocide by calling it "an allegation" and giving Israel's rejection in the same breath.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the finding is one side's claim weighed against Israel's denial.
    What is actually the case
    The outlet's own next sentence calls it a "determination". The documented record is a finding of genocide, and a denial does not make it an allegation.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “what it described as genocidal acts”

    What the words do
    The outlet distances itself from the finding of continued genocidal acts with "what it described as".
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the continuation of genocide after the ceasefire is only the commission's wording.
    What is actually the case
    The commission concluded that genocidal acts continued after the October 2025 ceasefire, with intent to destroy Palestinians in Gaza.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “what it characterized as genocide”

    What the words do
    The outlet again wraps the genocide in "what it characterized as", this time in the commission's demands.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That there is no established genocide for Israel to end, only a characterisation.
    What is actually the case
    The genocide is a documented finding of the UN Commission of Inquiry, and the ICJ has issued provisional measures in the genocide case.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry found, on 16 September 2025, that Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip.ohchr.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice has issued provisional measures in the genocide case against Israel; this is a documented finding, not an allegation awaiting a reporter's verdict.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Turning to Gaza, the commission repeated its September 2025 finding that Israel has committed genocide, and found that genocidal acts continued after the October 2025 ceasefire. Israel rejects the finding.

  2. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “in Judea and Samaria”

    What the words do
    The outlet names the territory with the settlers' name "Judea and Samaria" in its own voice, and never says West Bank or occupied.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the land where the crimes were found is Israeli territory, not occupied Palestinian land.
    What is actually the case
    The commission's findings concern the occupied West Bank. Its occupation is unlawful under the ICJ's 2024 advisory opinion.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “violence by Jewish residents of Judea and Samaria”

    What the words do
    The outlet calls settlers "Jewish residents", turning settler violence into the acts of ordinary residents.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the commission blamed local Jewish residents, not settlers in illegal settlements whose violence reinforced military operations.
    What is actually the case
    The commission found the attack ran through military operations reinforced by sustained settler violence. The settlements are illegal.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “remove Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria”

    What the words do
    The outlet rewrites the call to evacuate settlements as a call to "remove Jewish communities".
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the UN body demanded the removal of Jews as such.
    What is actually the case
    The commission called on Israel to evacuate settlements, which are illegal under international law.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “the IDF counterterrorism operation”

    What the words do
    The outlet labels Operation Iron Wall a "counterterrorism operation" in its own voice, adopting the army's own description.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the operation was established as counterterrorism, and the destruction and displacement are side effects.
    What is actually the case
    The army's explanation is a party's claim; the outlet itself attributes it in S20. The commission found the operations part of a widespread and systematic attack on civilians.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The commission found that Israeli military operations in the occupied West Bank, reinforced by settler violence, amount to a widespread and systematic attack on civilians, and called on Israel to evacuate the settlements.

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “The report acknowledged”

    What the words do
    The outlet says the report "acknowledged" Israel's account of its strikes, as if the commission conceded the point.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the commission accepted the struck sites were terrorist targets.
    What is actually the case
    The commission set out Israel's explanation and then rejected it, concluding that genocidal acts continued.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “Israel's current security policies”

    What the words do
    The outlet calls the conduct under investigation "security policies" in its own voice.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the policies are about security, and the commission is stretching them back to 1948.
    What is actually the case
    The commission found extermination, torture, rape and persecution, not security policy.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“accused Israeli authorities and security forces of extermination”

    Show it in the article

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

UN commission accuses Israel of 'extermination'; Israel slams 'misinformation campaign'

A United Nations Human Rights Council-appointed commission on Monday leveled new accusations against Israel, alleging that the Jewish state has committed crimes against humanity, including "extermination," , while . The Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel claimed that Israeli military operations in Judea and Samaria since Hamas' October 7, 2023, massacre constituted a "widespread and systematic attack" against Palestinian Arab civilians. The commission accused Israeli authorities and security forces of extermination, torture, rape, other forms of sexual violence, and persecution based on nationality, race, and ethnicity. It also alleged that Israeli authorities had deliberately incorporated into a broader policy of displacing Palestinian Arabs. The report further sought to link to the events surrounding its establishment in 1948, alleging that successive Israeli governments had pursued a continuing policy of territorial expansion and Palestinian Arab displacement. The Israeli Mission to the United Nations in Geneva strongly rejected the accusations, describing the report as part of a campaign to undermine Israel's legitimacy and distort the history of the Jewish state's establishment. "The latest report of the Commission of Inquiry is yet another manifestation of its misinformation campaign to demonize the State of Israel and portray its very existence as criminal," the mission stated. "Reflecting the institutional bias of this mechanism, the report fundamentally distorts history, recasting Israel's defensive war for survival following the invasion by five Arab armies in May 1948 as a colonial 'expulsion' policy," the statement continued. Israeli Ambassador to the UN in Geneva Daniel Meron stated: "The attempt to destroy the Jewish state did not end in 1948. It continues today through efforts by actors such as the UN Commission of Inquiry to undermine Israel's legitimacy and deny its fundamental right to exist and defend itself." The Israeli mission also accused the commission of squandering substantial UN resources on misinformation, historical revisionism, and extremist ideologies. "The international community must reject these distortions, repudiate the Commission's findings and demand its immediate dissolution," the mission concluded. The 19-page report was released on Monday, one day before Israel's general election. The three-member investigative commission was established by the UN Human Rights Council in 2021 and does not speak on behalf of the United Nations itself. According to the report, the commission investigated seven cases and documented six additional cases involving Palestinian Arabs killed or injured between November 2023 and June 2026. The investigators claimed that Israeli security personnel had intentionally killed civilians who posed no immediate threat. The commission also challenged Israeli military explanations for several incidents and alleged that security forces were operating under increasingly permissive rules of engagement. The report specifically criticized Operation Iron Wall, launched in January 2025, claiming that military activity in Jenin, Tulkarm, and other areas of northern Samaria had resulted in widespread destruction and the displacement of tens of thousands of Palestinian Arabs. The commission claimed that Israeli military operations had shifted toward the extensive destruction of housing and infrastructure in Arab refugee camps. The report acknowledged that the IDF had explained the operations as efforts to dismantle terrorist infrastructure and restore operational freedom for Israeli forces. Turning to Gaza, the commission repeated its earlier accusation that Israel had committed genocide during the war triggered by Hamas' October 7 attack, . The commission first made that determination in September 2025. Its latest report alleged that Israeli military operations following the October 2025 ceasefire demonstrated the continuation of . The investigators examined Israeli airstrikes carried out in October 2025, as well as incidents involving Palestinian Arabs approaching or crossing the Yellow Line separating areas under Israeli military control from other parts of Gaza. that Israel had identified sites struck during the October operations as terrorist targets and attributed additional military action to ceasefire violations. Nevertheless, the commission alleged that the strikes and the expansion of Israeli-controlled territory demonstrated a continuing intention to destroy Palestinian Arab communities. The commission also renewed allegations of sexual violence and mistreatment involving Palestinian Arab detainees and participants in the 2025 Global Sumud Flotilla. It called on Israel to end in Gaza, withdraw from Palestinian territories, , and provide compensation to Palestinian Arabs harmed during military operations. The commission additionally urged countries to investigate and prosecute suspected Israeli violations of international law and called on the International Criminal Court prosecutor to examine the allegations in connection with existing and potential arrest warrants. The report also examined the conduct of Palestinian Authority security forces, finding that the PA had violated the rights of Palestinian Arabs through killings, excessive force, arbitrary detention, and the suppression of political dissent. According to the commission, Palestinian security forces killed at least 14 Palestinian Arabs, including two minors, between October 2023 and October 2025. The investigators cited Operation Protect the Homeland, which Palestinian Authority security forces launched against armed groups in Jenin in December 2024, and documented cases in which security personnel allegedly killed or injured individuals who posed no immediate threat. The report also examined the killing of a female journalism student in Jenin in December 2024 who had reportedly published criticism of Palestinian security forces before her death. The commission accused the Palestinian Authority of suppressing journalists, human rights activists, and political opponents while failing to properly investigate killings attributed to its security personnel. It concluded that the PA had violated the right to life and personal security and had failed to provide effective remedies to victims and their families. The commission called on the Palestinian Authority to conduct independent investigations, prosecute those responsible for violations, and stop targeting journalists and human rights defenders. The commission is scheduled to present its report to the UN General Assembly in New York on Monday.

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

See how 33 outlets covered this story