Tehran Times, on Lebanon, 27 September 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Hezbollah marks second anniversary of Sayyed Nasrallah’s martyrdom with vows of continued resistance

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

TEHRAN — The southern suburbs of Beirut transformed into a sprawling sea of black and yellow on Sunday. Tens of thousands of mourners converged on the shrine of Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah to mark two years since his assassination in an Israeli airstrike. Crowds filled the streets surrounding the site in Bir al-Abed near the old airport road. Their chants of loyalty rose above the din of a city still bearing the physical scars of the U.S.-backed Israeli bombing campaign.

Many attendees carried portraits of Sayyed Nasrallah and his successor, Sayyed Hashem Safieddine, who was martyred in an Israeli strike mere days after his mentor. Gathering in a neighborhood that Israeli warplanes systematically reduced to rubble was a deliberate statement of defiance. Mourners traveled from southern villages . Faithful to the pledge Addressing the massive gathering in a televised broadcast, Hezbollah Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Sheikh Qassem delivered an uncompromising defense of the resistance.

His speech served as both a tribute to the fallen commanders and a blunt indictment of Lebanon’s political establishment. Sheikh Qassem spoke directly to the martyred leaders. He told Sayyed Nasrallah that while his physical body had departed, his teachings remain the driving force of the movement. “You are the resistance and the resistance is you, and you have become its symbol for the free people of the world,” Sheikh Qassem declared.

He praised Sayyed Safieddine as an indispensable pillar of the jihadist journey who never tired in his service to the cause. The organizing theme of the memorial was “Inna Ala al-Ahd” (We remain faithful to the pledge). Sheikh Qassem defined this phrase as absolute operational continuity. When leaders are martyred, new commanders immediately step forward to maintain the exact same trajectory, the Resistance leader explained. The pledge guarantees the continuation of the against foreign aggression until every inch of occupied land is fully liberated.

The battlefield ledger Sheikh Qassem then pivoted to the military realities on the ground, who question the utility of Hezbollah’s arms. He turned the scrutiny back on the government. “Some, especially among our opponents, ask: what has the Resistance done?” he noted. “But it seems they forgot to ask: what has the state done?” Hezbollah halted the Israeli aggression project, the Hezbollah leader explained.

Sheikh Qassem stated that the Israeli military deployed up to 90,000 soldiers and officers, backed by unlimited American capabilities, yet utterly failed to break the resistance. Sheikh Qassem listed the battlegrounds where Hezbollah forces entrenched themselves and bled the advancing brigades.

They held their ground in Bint Jbeil, Khiam, Aita al-Shaab, Naqoura, and al-Bayyada. , Sheikh Qassem stated. He honored the 3,400 martyrs and 14,600 wounded from Operation People of Might. Sheikh Qassem directed special recognition to the survivors of the pager terror attacks, calling them living martyrs who transformed their wounds into active resistance.

Domestic betrayal and the disarmament illusion The sharpest political warnings targeted Lebanon’s governing authority. Sheikh Qassem “an accessory” to the Israeli-American project by offering unforced concessions. He argued that the current framework agreement handed Israel all of Lebanon’s negotiating leverage in a single session. Pointing to seven rounds of direct negotiations that yielded results “below zero,” he demanded an immediate freeze on direct talks.

The secretary-general ridiculed the persistent demands for Hezbollah to surrender its weapons. “You stayed two years trying to strip the weapons and you could not, so why do you ask the Lebanese Army?” he asked. Asking the national army to serve as a disarmament tool for political factions is a delusion, the Resistance leader said. Sheikh Qassem affirmed that Hezbollah will never forfeit a single inch of Lebanon’s 10,452 square kilometers.

Turning to the collapse of the Lebanese state, he asked where the government was regarding the ruined economy, hyperinflation, electricity blackouts, and stolen depositor funds. Sheikh Qassem announced that Hezbollah, utilizing its own resources and donor funding, will shortly unveil a comprehensive housing and reconstruction project for displaced citizens, stepping in where the state has completely vanished. Concluding his address, Sheikh Qassem reaffirmed that Palestine remains the absolute compass for the resistance.

He saluted the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Leader of the Islamic Revolution for their steadfast backing. Pointing to Israel’s isolation at the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly, he noted that the regime has become an exposed global pariah.

Read the original article on tehrantimes.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

The Tehran Times reports the Nasrallah memorial and Naim Qassem's speech and names Israel as the actor in the killings of Nasrallah and Safieddine and in the bombing of Beirut's southern suburbs. It lets Qassem's claims that Israel was kept from setting up occupation zones and that his fighters held the Ali al-Taher ridge stand with nothing against them, although the record and same-day coverage show Israel occupies a zone in the south and destroyed positions on that ridge. In its own voice it adds verdicts such as "legendary performances" and "systematically dismantling the arguments", and it gives the government Qassem attacks no reply.

  1. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “Israeli forces were physically prevented from establishing permanent occupation zones or settlements in Lebanon, he explained.”

    Why this matters
    The Tehran Times reports Qassem's claim that Israel was prevented from setting up occupation zones, introduces it with "he explained", and sets nothing against it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away believing Israel holds no occupation zone in southern Lebanon.
    The context
    Israel occupies a self-declared security zone in southern Lebanon. Israel says it will not fully withdraw, and Antiwar.com described an ongoing invasion and occupation of the south on the same day.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “At the Ali al-Taher ridge, resistance units maintained their defensive posture under heavy bombardment for three consecutive months”

    Why this matters
    The Tehran Times reports Qassem's account of the ridge as a position that was held and never says what happened to it afterwards.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the Ali al-Taher ridge is still held by Hezbollah.
    The context
    Same-day coverage reports that Israel carried out detonations on the ridge this month to destroy Hezbollah positions, and that the ridge was seized by Israel.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Qassem said Israeli forces had been prevented from establishing permanent occupation zones, although Israel holds a self-declared security zone in the south and says it will not fully withdraw. He praised fighters on the Ali al-Taher ridge, where Israeli forces carried out detonations this month.

  2. Writes an existing occupation as a threat

    Minor

    “still under the threat of occupation”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Tehran Times describes the southern villages as under "the threat of occupation".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes occupation of the south as something that may happen, not something already in place.
    The context
    Israel already occupies a self-declared security zone in southern Lebanon.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Fighters delivered legendary performances across the southern front.”

    Why this matters
    The Tehran Times calls the fighting "legendary performances" in its own voice, with no attribution, between two sentences that attribute the battlefield account to Qassem.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the praise as the outlet's own established account of the fighting.
    The context
    The account of the southern front comes from Qassem's speech, as the next sentence shows.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Sheikh Qassem listed the battlegrounds”

    Show it in the article

    “systematically dismantling the arguments of domestic opponents”

    Why this matters
    The Tehran Times tells the reader, in its own voice, that Qassem dismantled his opponents' arguments rather than that he answered them.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the debate over Hezbollah's arms has been settled in Qassem's favour.
    The context
    The article reports only Qassem's side. No opponent's argument or reply appears.

    Show it in the article

    “courageous, divine resistance”

    Why this matters
    With no attribution, the Tehran Times describes the resistance as "courageous" and "divine" in a sentence that reads as its own statement.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the religious and moral verdict as the outlet's reporting.
    The context
    This is Qassem's description of the pledge, and the article does not attribute it.

    Show it in the article

  4. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “accused the state of acting as”

    Why this matters
    The Tehran Times reports Qassem's accusation that the Lebanese state is an accessory to the Israeli-American project and gives no response from the president or the government.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears only Qassem's charge against the state and none of the government's position.
    The context
    The dispute between Hezbollah and President Aoun's government was reported the same day, including Qassem's direct criticism of Aoun.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Tehran Times

  1. 24 OctIsrael brings talks with Lebanon to a standstill by refusing to withdraw from ‘pilot zones’3.0
  2. 19 OctLebanese president says Israel violating framework agreement3.0
  3. 17 OctCeasefire must cover all fronts to end regional war, says diplomat3.0
  4. 7 OctHezbollah leader vows complete liberation of southern Lebanon, praises Iraq for expelling US3.0
  5. 28 SeptSouth Lebanon faces aggressive Israeli offensive as US ‘diplomacy’ provides cover3.0

Everything we scored from Tehran Times