We do not republish articles from The i Paper. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.
The i Paper sets out the US indictment's allegations against three men accused of directing attacks in London, and mostly keeps them attributed to prosecutors. Its headline says the images 'show how' the suspect plotted the attacks, while the body says the stills only allegedly show them and notes that one suspect has pleaded not guilty.
Headline goes beyond the article
Minor
“The images that show how”
Why this matters
The headline says the images "show how" the suspect plotted attacks. It keeps quotation marks around the plotting but drops the qualifier from what the images show.
The impression it gives
The reader comes away thinking the images are settled proof of the plot.
The context
The body says the stills only "allegedly show" the attacks, and that the evidence comes from an indictment. The defendant has pleaded not guilty.
How we know
Elsewhere in the article“allegedly show attacks on targets in London”
Elsewhere in the article“has pleaded not guilty to plotting”