Evening Standard, on UK Politics, 12 November 2026
We do not republish articles from Evening Standard. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.
Read the original article on standard.co.uk (opens in a new tab)The Evening Standard reports Barking and Dagenham Council's forecast £20.5m overspend, driven mainly by children's and adult social care, and attributes the causes and comments to named councillors and council papers. One sentence mislabels the net overspend across all departments as the overspend on care alone, which conflicts with the figures the article gives later. Otherwise nothing in it misleads.
Minor
“the local authority expects an overspend of £20.5million on care provision during this financial year”
How we know
“The predicted overspend is partially offset by other departments spending less than planned, leaving a net overspend of £20.5m.”
It explains how the headline figure is reached, so a reader can see that it is a net figure after savings elsewhere.
“These are services that local authorities are required to provide by law.”
It tells the reader that the council cannot simply cut these services. This is context that changes how the overspend should be read.
“We have seen such horrendous hikes in service charges for placements and things like that, that the budgets are just not keeping up.”
The article keeps the strong word "horrendous" inside the councillor's quotation and does not adopt it in its own voice.
Spot something we missed? Report this article