The Jerusalem Post, on Iran, 24 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Iran-backed militias in Iraq accuse US of violating airspace, as threats grow - analysis

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Iran-backed militias in Iraq accused the United States of violating Iraqi airspace. The statement comes amid tensions between the Iraqi government and Iran-backed militias over efforts to bring weapons under state control, according to a report by Rudaw."Standing with the forces of righteousness against the forces of evil is a duty dictated by sound human nature," the IRI said, according to Rudaw. The group sees the conflict involving Iran as a struggle against the US and Israel.

The IRI has attacked Israel in the past during the conflict in Gaza.The Islamic Resistance in Iraq, an umbrella group of Iran-backed militias, continues to support Iran. The group issued a statement amid speculation about a possible new war with Iran.The militias also accused Baghdad of appeasing the US due to Washington's pressure on Iraq. The IRI is unhappy that Baghdad has been reducing commercial flights and closing border crossings with Iran.

The IRI claimed to have documented 171 violations of Iraqi airspace by US fighter jets and reconnaissance aircraft between September 30 and Friday. The allegations were not independently verified.

The accusations come after the US-led anti-ISIS coalition formally ended its military mission in Iraq on September 30. Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi has sought to use the transition to bring militia weapons under government control. However, several powerful factions have rejected the initiative. The plan is set to take effect by June 2027. Some militias have agreed, while others have rejected the policy.Some militias opposed to disarmament, others willing to cooperateAccording to Rudaw, Kataib Hezbollah and Harakat al-Nujaba remain opposed to disarmament, while Harakat Ansar Allah al-Awfiya and Kataib Sayyid al-Shuhada have expressed willingness to cooperate with government measures.Zaidi has extended the disarmament deadline to June 30, 2027, by which time "no weapons will remain outside the framework of the state," he said in an interview with Iraqi state media, quoted by Rudaw.The dispute illustrates a central challenge facing Iraq.

Even after the US-led coalition's withdrawal, Iran-backed factions continue to portray their weapons as necessary for confronting Washington and Israel. This puts them increasingly at odds with Baghdad's efforts to assert state authority over armed groups.

The tensions come as the US State Department has warned of increasing regional threats that could affect security in Iraq. On Saturday, the US Embassy in Iraq published an update to the State Department's travel advisory, citing the threat of increased attacks by the Iranian-backed Houthis. The warnings also cite terrorist threats in Iraq, including those posed by Iran-backed militias.

The advisory maintained the existing warning against all travel to Iraq. It noted that Houthi attacks against Saudi Arabia, including strikes on civilian airports and critical infrastructure, could lead to wider regional escalation."

The hostilities have the potential to escalate rapidly beyond that immediate area," the State Department warned. It also noted that "the Iraqi government cannot guarantee the safety of US citizens against sudden outbreaks of violence and armed conflict."

The advisory specifically highlighted threats from armed groups inside Iraq. "Terrorists, including ISIS and Iran-aligned militias, encourage and conduct attacks against US persons and interests in Iraq," the State Department said.State Department warns of threats to US citizens, companiesIt also warned that militias threaten American citizens and international companies, citing attacks involving drones, indirect fire, and improvised explosive devices.

Potential targets include airports, energy infrastructure, hotels, and diplomatic facilities.

The warning illustrates the broader security challenges facing Baghdad. While the Iraqi government seeks to consolidate control over armed factions, Washington continues to view Iran-aligned militias as a threat. The escalation involving the Houthis also highlights how regional conflicts could further complicate Iraq's efforts to maintain stability and avoid being drawn into new confrontations.

The tensions in Iraq come amid other developments involving Iran and Iranian-backed groups across the region. On Saturday, Rudaw reported that US intelligence had warned of increased Iranian efforts to assassinate American diplomats and officials in the Middle East and elsewhere. Citing an Axios report, Rudaw said a memorandum dated Friday from US National Intelligence Director Jay Clayton to Secretary of State Marco Rubio .

The report comes as Washington reduces staffing at several embassies amid concerns about regional escalation.Meanwhile, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said on Saturday that it had targeted a gathering center belonging to the Kurdistan Free Life Party (PJAK), an Iranian Kurdish opposition group. The attack took place in Iran but could have implications for Iraq, where Tehran has previously targeted Iranian Kurdish opposition groups.

According to Rudaw, clashes between the IRGC and PJAK's armed wing, the Eastern Kurdistan Units (YRK), have intensified over the last week. Iran has used drones and artillery against mountainous areas where the Kurdish fighters operate. Iran's Mehr News Agency described the latest operation as a preemptive strike against PJAK members allegedly preparing attacks.

These developments also come as Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi continues to insist that his government will end the presence of armed factions operating outside state control. In an interview quoted by Rudaw on Friday, Zaidi said that "Iraq will soon, God willing, be a state free of factions, like other countries in the world, and weapons will be exclusively in the hands of the Iraqi security forces."

The developments illustrate the competing pressures facing Iraq. Baghdad wants to consolidate state authority over armed groups, but Iran-backed militias continue to see themselves as part of a wider regional confrontation with the US and Israel. At the same time, Iran's operations against Kurdish opposition groups and reports of threats to American officials suggest that tensions could spread across several fronts.One example of Baghdad's progress is a new agreement with a Yazidi armed group called YBS in Sinjar in northern Iraq.

Baghdad also says it has reached a deal with Turkey for Ankara to leave a base near Bashiqa. However, these may be low-hanging fruit because Iran-backed militias are, in some ways, more powerful. Iran shares a long border with Iraq. It views Iraq as a "near abroad," . It has carried out 1,000 attacks on the Kurdistan Region of Iraq, but also 600 on the rest of Iraq, using militias in some attacks.For Iraq, the challenge is not only disarming militias.

It is also preventing the country from becoming a battleground in a wider regional conflict. The coming months will test whether Zaidi can turn his government's commitments into reality, particularly as the June 2027 deadline approaches.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Jerusalem Post reports the Islamic Resistance in Iraq's airspace accusations against the US, Baghdad's disarmament plan and US warnings about Iran-backed groups, and mostly attributes its claims. Near the end, the reporter states in his own voice that Iran's government 'feels it should control Iraq', with no source. The article also reports a US memo on alleged Iranian assassination plots with no Iranian response.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “basically meaning it feels it should control Iraq”

    Why this matters
    The words "it feels it should control Iraq" state, in the reporter's own voice, what Iran's government privately believes, with no source.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established that Tehran's aim is to control Iraq.
    The context
    Nothing in the article sources this belief to an Iranian official, a document or an analyst. It is the reporter's reading of an unseen motive, written as fact. The article elsewhere attributes positions to named sources, such as Rudaw, the State Department and Mehr.

    Show it in the article

  2. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “warned that some alleged Iranian plots had reached advanced stages”

    Why this matters
    The article reports the US intelligence warning of Iranian assassination plots and leaves it there. No Iranian response appears in the passage or anywhere after it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is left with only Washington's account of the alleged plots.
    The context
    The article gives no Iranian comment, denial or refusal to comment on the alleged plots. The claim rests on a single US memo reported second-hand through Axios and Rudaw.

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 25 OctIraq braces for renewed Iran conflict after 1,000 strikes on Kurdistan, 600 militia attacks3.0
  2. 25 Oct'Fair game': Iranian officials say US diplomats, officials are targets for assassinations - report3.0
  3. 25 OctTehran threatens strikes on energy, civilian targets, and nuclear escalation if attacked6.0
  4. 24 OctIraq believes Israel may have struck militia weapons supplied by Iran - report6.0
  5. 24 OctTrump says US may renew strikes against Iran, 'do another little Epic Fury'3.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post