The Jerusalem Post, on Iran, 25 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Tehran threatens strikes on energy, civilian targets,

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Tehran is threatening to respond to a renewed US and Israeli air campaign with strikes on an expanded list of targets, including civilian infrastructure, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal.The warnings, issued publicly and over diplomatic communications, said that Iran would attack not only American bases and warships, but also natural energy infrastructure, natural gas pipelines, airports, and other civilian targets in the Persian Gulf region.Tehran has also threatened to utilize a new array of weapons, including nuclear bombs.

According to Iran International, , the head of the Iranian parliament's International Affairs Committee, Mohammad-Saleh Jokar, asked "The Islamic Republic's authorities, in defense of the country and for the purpose of deterrence, to permit the use of deterrent weapons, including nuclear weapons, in the event of a US attack on Iran.” Jokar called for the suspension of Iran's cooperation with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in the event of an attack by the United States, according to Iran International.

He said that countries hosting the US in their territories or airspace would face a "harsh response" and "pay a heavy price."Iran maintains stockpile of hundreds of thousands of missiles, dronesAnalysts, according to the WSJ, estimate Iran to hold hundreds of thousands of ballistic missiles, having resumed production in underground facilities.Iran is apparently leveraging its stockpile of missiles and drones - which remains at significant levels even after Operation Roaring Lion, Operation Epic Fury, and the succeeding blockade on the country - in an effort to deter an attack.In the most recent bout with Iran, significant damage was inflicted on US air bases, embassies, and fleets throughout the region.

Energy and industrial facilities in the UAE, as well as gas plants and airports in Qatar, Dubai, Kuwait, and Bahrain were also hit., especially at a time when interceptor missile stockpiles are under pressure in Israel and in US-aligned nations in the Gulf, following a suspended period of hostilities.Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi wrote an op-ed in the Financial Times, warning that new attacks “will put civilian lives and the well-being of all regional states and the global economy at great risk.”Despite the fact that a major portion of Iran's weapons stockpiles and defensive capabilities were degraded in the recent operations (the Pentagon said that up to 90% of drones, missiles, and naval industry was destroyed), analysts told the WSJ that Iran is more than willing to expand its retaliatory efforts.IRGC runs risk of overextending in retaliatory efforts“The consensus in Tehran now believes that deterrence requires imposing immediate, sustained and substantial costs on its adversaries,” said Sina Toossi, an Iran expert at the Center for International Policy."Iran runs the risk of overreaching if it tries to make good on all its threats," an expert on the Revolutionary Guard, Saeid Golkarat, told the WSJ.

The country needs to carefully manage its shrinking stockpile of missiles, he assessed.“They certainly have the capability to inflict major damage to the region's energy and internet infrastructure,” said Washington Institute senior fellow Farzin Nadimi. “But if Iranians do that, they'll most likely lose their own in reciprocal attacks.”Negotiations have been deadlocked for months, and US President Donald Trump has repeatedly warned Iran that failure to come to an agreement could result in the US attacking Iran after midterm elections in early November.Israel, too, has stepped up its preparations for in recent weeks, with conflicting reports saying that the IDF was planning to strike Iran on October 10 before being reeled in by US President Donald Trump.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Jerusalem Post's headline turns one parliamentarian's call, sourced to Iran International, into a nuclear threat from Tehran. The Post also states Tehran's aims without a source and calls Iran's government 'the regime' in its own narration.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “and nuclear escalation if attacked”

    Why this matters
    The headline puts "nuclear escalation" among the threats "Tehran" has made, next to the strike threats the WSJ reported.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Iran's government has threatened nuclear escalation.
    The context
    The body supports only a call by one parliamentarian, reported second hand by an outlet opposed to the government, for permission to use nuclear weapons and for suspending NPT cooperation. No government statement of a nuclear threat appears in the article.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“according to Iran International”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Tehran threatens strikes on energy and civilian targets if attacked; Iranian MP urges nuclear option.

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “Tehran aims to cause even more pain in the case of a renewed campaign”

    Why this matters
    The Post states what Tehran "aims" to do as fact, with no source.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the Iranian government's intention to inflict greater pain as established.
    The context
    The article gives no source for this aim. The nearby claims about Iran's thinking come from named analysts, so this line should carry attribution too.

    Show it in the article

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “a media outlet opposed to the regime”

    Why this matters
    The Post uses "the regime" in its own narration for Iran's government.
    The impression it gives
    A reader absorbs a verdict on Iran's government as illegitimate, delivered as neutral description.
    The context
    "Iranian government" describes the same body without the verdict.

    Show it in the article

    “potential strikes against the Islamic regime”

    Why this matters
    The Post again uses "the Islamic regime" in its own voice, here as the target of Israeli strikes.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is led to see the planned strikes as aimed at an illegitimate regime rather than at a country.
    The context
    The article gives no source for the label. It is the outlet's own word.

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 25 OctEx-Mossad chief Barnea intended for Iran to see Israel's operations to overwhelm IRGC6.0
  2. 25 OctIraq braces for renewed Iran conflict after 1,000 strikes on Kurdistan, 600 militia attacks3.0
  3. 25 Oct'Fair game': Iranian officials say US diplomats, officials are targets for assassinations - report3.0
  4. 24 OctIraq believes Israel may have struck militia weapons supplied by Iran - report6.0
  5. 24 OctIran-backed militias in Iraq accuse US of violating airspace, as threats grow - analysis3.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post