The Telegraph, on Climate, 6 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

as Burnham plans ban

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

The SNP has backed new drilling in the North Sea just as Andy Burnham has promised to ban it for good. The Prime Minister is supporting the Energy Independence Bill, which includes a permanent ban on new licences that could only be overturned by a vote in Parliament. At the same time, the SNP has reversed its previous policy, introduced by Nicola Sturgeon, which had a “presumption against” new drilling. The U-turn puts Holyrood on a collision course with Westminster as the SNP has demanded the proposed permanent ban be removed from the bill.

Energy exploration in the UK is subject to a temporary moratorium. It was imposed by Ed Miliband, the former Energy Secretary, but could be lifted by any successor. However, Mr Burnham is now supporting a bill, introduced by Miatta Fahnbulleh, the new Energy Secretary, that would make it harder to reopen the North Sea by requiring a majority vote in Parliament to approve the lifting of a ban. In an unexpected move, John Swinney , the First Minister at Holyrood, said he was opposed to Labour’s proposals despite his party’s .

Speaking on Thursday, Mr Swinney said he supported some measures in the bill, but added: “We do not support the provisions of that Bill in relation to the granting of new licences for the exploration of new oil and gas fields for the simple reason that any particular applications need to be considered in relation to their impact on our carbon reduction targets, given the fact that we are going to be using oil and gas for some years to come.”

Both the Conservatives and Reform UK have pledged to restart North Sea exploration and drilling were they to win power. Senior figures blamed the SNP’s previous objection to new licences for the party’s by-election loss of Aberdeen South in June to the Tories. The SNP now plans to vote against Labour’s energy bill unless the ban on new licences is removed. Mr Swinney said: “We will seek to get those provisions removed. If those provisions are in the Bill when it goes to its final vote, we can’t support the Bill.”

The First Minister refused to say, explicitly, whether he would personally instruct nationalist MPs to vote against the legislation. Lord Offord of Garvel, Reform’s Scottish leader, welcomed the move, saying: “I’m delighted to hear the First Minister do yet another U-turn on his position. So much for the presumption against new licences in oil and gas. Delighted to hear that.” Despite the shift, Mr Swinney refused to say whether he supports the development of the Rosebank oil field off the coast of Shetland.

Last month, Labour approved new drilling at the Jackdaw gas field off the coast of Aberdeen but the fate of Rosebank has yet to be decided. The First Minister was asked about Rosebank seven times by Russell Findlay, the Scottish Tory leader, at last week’s session of First Minister’s Questions but he failed to give a clear answer. Mr Findlay accused the First Minister of failing to be “straight” with voters about North Sea drilling. He said: “Swinney repeatedly refuses to back new North Sea drilling but then suggests he will oppose Labour’s ban on new drilling.

He’s now saying this after yet again failing to give me a straight answer. Oil and gas workers can’t trust a word he says.” Labour said its bill would “end new licences to explore new oil and gas fields while supporting continued production from existing licensed areas”. If approved by Parliament, the new laws would allow oil companies to keep operating existing licensed oil and gas fields until they are depleted. But they would be able to drill new wells only if they could be connected to existing infrastructure by subsea pipelines known as tiebacks.

This would be in line with Labour’s 2024 manifesto pledge that stated: “We will not issue new licences to explore new fields because they will not take a penny off bills, cannot make us energy secure and will only accelerate the worsening climate crisis.” David Whitehouse, the chief executive of Offshore Energies UK, a trade body for Britain’s oil and gas producers, said the planned bill would simply make the UK more dependent on imported oil and gas.

“This will leave households and businesses exposed in an increasingly volatile world. We should be making the most of the energy we produce here at home rather than relying on imports.” The Tories have also criticised the new bill, saying it would make Britain more dependent on oil and gas imports and decrease energy security in the UK.

Read the original article on telegraph.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Telegraph reports the SNP's opposition to the permanent ban on new North Sea licences in Labour's Energy Independence Bill. Its headline says the SNP "backs new North Sea drilling", but the body shows John Swinney opposing a blanket ban and wanting each application weighed against carbon targets, while refusing to back Rosebank. In its own voice the paper also calls the SNP's net zero commitment "ideological".

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “SNP backs new North Sea drilling”

    Why this matters
    The headline says the SNP "backs new North Sea drilling", as if the party now supports new fields going ahead.
    The impression it gives
    The SNP has come out in favour of new oil and gas drilling in the North Sea.
    The context
    The body shows Mr Swinney opposing a blanket legal ban and saying each application must be weighed against Scotland's carbon reduction targets. He refused to say whether he supports Rosebank, and the Scottish Tory leader complains he "repeatedly refuses to back new North Sea drilling". The Scotsman reports the same position as case-by-case assessment of whether a field is better for the climate than imports.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“any particular applications need to be considered in relation to their impact on our carbon reduction targets”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Mr Swinney refused to say whether he supports the development of the Rosebank oil field”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Swinney repeatedly refuses to back new North Sea drilling”
    • The Scotsman reported“each application should instead be assessed on a case-by-case basis as to whether it is better for the climate than importing fossil fuels”John Swinney confirms SNP U-turn on new North Sea oil and gas (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “ideological commitment to net zero”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Telegraph calls the SNP's commitment to net zero "ideological".
    The impression it gives
    Net zero is a matter of political ideology rather than a response to documented warming and binding emissions targets.
    The context
    Nothing in the article supports the label. Mr Swinney ties his position to "our carbon reduction targets", and cutting emissions is what limits further warming.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“their impact on our carbon reduction targets”
    • On the recordCutting greenhouse gas emissions is what limits further warming, and every increment of warming avoided reduces harm.ipcc.ch (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Telegraph

  1. 8 NovNational Grid’s near-£50bn debt pile set to push up energy bills3.0
  2. 5 NovLabour MPs accuse Andy Burnham of hypocrisy over North Sea drilling ban3.0
  3. 4 NovDropping milk to go vegan is bad for you, study warns3.0
  4. 4 NovAndy Burnham to make new North Sea drilling illegal3.0
  5. 3 NovKellogg’s removes rice from Rice Krispies6.0

Everything we scored from The Telegraph