Press TV, on Iran, 30 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Three offending tankers catch fire in Strait of Hormuz after defying Iranian warnings: IRGC

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

The Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) Navy says three oil tankers attempting to pass through the Strait of Hormuz via an unauthorized route were stopped and caught fire in separate incidents. In a statement on Friday, the IRGC Navy said two of the violating tankers, one east and the other west of the Strait of Hormuz, had attempted to cross the waterway via an unauthorized route before being stopped following separate incidents. They had switched off their navigation and positioning systems and were attempting to leave the strait with support of the “terrorist” US military, it added.

“After ignoring several radio warnings, the two oil tankers entered the unsafe area, encountered incidents, and were brought to a halt off the southern coast of the Strait of Hormuz,” the IRGC explained. IRGC releases footage of two oil tankers that were stopped in the Strait of Hormuz after attempting to cross via an unauthorized route. — Press TV 🔻 (@PressTV) October 30, 2026 Follow: https://t.co/oa9JV4ikYQ pic.twitter.com/3tSA93h7g2 It emphasized that the fires and stoppages involving the violating vessels resulted from the “malicious actions” of the terrorist US military and the vessels’ disregard for Iranian regulations governing passage through the Strait of Hormuz.

"The tanker owners will bear full responsibility for any consequences arising from unauthorized passage and disregard for maritime and safety warnings," the IRGC said. "We warn the enemy that any movement, infiltration or provocative action within areas monitored by the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran will be met with a firm and proportionate response," added the statement. In a separate statement, the IRGC Navy said a supertanker carrying more than two million barrels of oil had struck a naval mine while attempting to pass through the Strait of Hormuz via an unauthorized route.

It added that the vessel exploded and was left burning near the entrance to the strategic waterway. Iran Army Navy destroys enemy remotely operated vessel east of Hormuz Iran’s Army Navy also said on Friday that its forces struck and destroyed an enemy remotely operated vessel early in the morning while it was operating east of the Strait of Hormuz. "Additionally, two violating enemy oil tankers were damaged and caught fire after striking naval mines while operating in prohibited and unsafe areas east of the Strait of Hormuz, with their tracking systems switched off, in defiance of warnings and announced regulations,” it added.

The Army Navy emphasized that the owners of the tankers would bear full responsibility for any consequences arising from unauthorized passage and disregard for maritime and safety warnings. It also warned the enemy that any movement, infiltration or provocative action within areas monitored by Iran’s Armed Forces would be met with a strong and proportionate response. Since the outbreak of the on February 28, Tehran has imposed strict regulations on the Strait, requiring all vessels to coordinate with Iranian naval authorities and obtain permission before transiting.

Iran says the Strait of Hormuz remains under its complete control, with the IRGC Navy and the Army Navy jointly managing security in the region.

Read the original article on presstv.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Press TV mostly attributes the IRGC and Army Navy statements, but in its own voice it says ships using unauthorised corridors do so at their own peril and face defensive measures, which states the IRGC's position as fact. It also calls the war a war of aggression with no facts beyond the date to support the label. Every voice in the article is Iranian military, and the crews aboard the burning tankers are never mentioned.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “Ships that attempt to evade detection by silencing their systems or that venture into unauthorized corridors do so at their own peril and expose themselves to the defensive measures in place to protect the Islamic Republic’s sovereign rights and the security of the Persian Gulf.”

    Why this matters
    Press TV drops all attribution here. In its own voice it says the ships invited what happened to them and calls the naval mines that set tankers on fire "defensive measures".
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes it as established fact that the tankers were in the wrong and that the mines and fires were lawful defence of Iran's sovereign rights.
    The context
    That the routes were unauthorised and the areas prohibited is the IRGC's position. The article attributes it elsewhere ("Iran says the Strait of Hormuz remains"), and other outlets report it as a claim. Al-Monitor writes "what it described as unauthorised routes". Euronews writes that Iranian officials "claimed" the vessels were in prohibited areas.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “US-Israeli war of aggression against Iran”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls the war a "war of aggression" in its own narration, with no attribution and no facts in the article to support the label.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes the legal and moral character of the war as settled fact reported by the outlet.
    The context
    The article gives no facts about how the war began beyond the date. "Aggression" is one party's characterisation and should be attributed to whoever makes it.

    Show it in the article

  3. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “The IRGC Navy has consistently warned commercial operators and shipping companies against heeding false assurances from external actors and against endangering crews by flouting established rules.”

    Why this matters
    Press TV closes on the IRGC's warning, which blames shipping companies for endangering crews and calls outside assurances "false".
    The impression it gives
    The reader leaves with the IRGC's account as the only one, and with the shipowners cast as responsible for any danger to crews.
    The context
    Every voice in the article is the IRGC or Iran's Army Navy. No shipowner, crew, flag state or other party is quoted, and the article says nothing of the crews aboard the burning tankers.

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Press TV

  1. 30 OctIran3.0
  2. 29 OctIran6.0
  3. 29 OctIRGC Navy captures, lands US spy drone intact in Strait of Hormuz7.3
  4. 29 OctIran6.0
  5. 29 OctFormer US president Obama warns war on Iran has left US ‘more vulnerable’ as Tehran holds Hormuz ‘veto power’3.0

Everything we scored from Press TV