Times of Israel, on Iran, 26 October 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

Hezbollah rearming for possible renewed conflict with Israel ...

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

Hezbollah rearming for possible renewed conflict with Israel, Lebanese sources say

receives fresh cash from Tehran, rebuilds drone and explosives capabilities; claims right to ‘resistance’ against Israel

BEIRUT, Lebanon (Reuters) — The Iran-backed Hezbollah terror group has spent three months preparing for a possible resumption of hostilities with Israel, after receiving an infusion of cash from Iran, according to Lebanese security personnel briefed on its activities.

The group, founded by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards in 1982, has been dealt severe blows in two wars with Israel since 2024, with , and much of its arsenal destroyed.

Israeli forces now control its heartland of villages in southern Lebanon, and political pressure has mounted in Beirut for its disarmament.

, where civilians have been ordered to evacuate and . Israel says the zone is intended to prevent Hezbollah from reestablishing itself near the border and threatening communities in northern Israel.

But and has used a lull in hostilities since June to rearm, with a focus on procuring explosives and producing drones that can be flown into Israeli positions, two Lebanese security sources told Reuters.

One of the sources, and another close to Hezbollah, said the group had received tens of millions of dollars from Iran to help boost its military capabilities. That is in addition to around $200 million that the group received from Tehran to aid displaced families in its Shiite heartlands, which Reuters reported earlier this month.

Hezbollah has been restoring command-and-control structures that broke down in key battles, according to one of those sources and three other security officials familiar with the group’s operations.

In response to questions from Reuters, Israel’s presence on Lebanese territory gave it a legitimate right to any resistance. It rejected the suggestion that its command-and-control systems had broken down.

Israel’s military declined to comment. Iran’s permanent mission to the United Nations in Geneva did not immediately respond to Reuters questions.

A US State Department spokesman said Washington would keep strangling Hezbollah’s finances through sanctions and other measures.

Hezbollah on alert

Hezbollah’s effort comes amid continued tensions in the wider regional conflict following US-Israeli strikes on Iran in February.

Hezbollah opened fire in support of Iran on March 2, triggering an Israeli offensive that killed more than 4,000 people and uprooted a quarter of Lebanon’s population, mostly members of Hezbollah’s Shiite Muslim constituency.

Hostilities largely abated over the summer as an interim Iran-US deal included a Lebanon ceasefire and Washington mediated talks between Lebanon and Israel. Full-scale hostilities have not resumed in Lebanon despite the collapse of the US-Iranian deal, though .

Hezbollah is on alert for a possible US-Iran escalation, potentially reigniting the Lebanon front.

The sources told Reuters the group had not yet managed to fully prepare its stockpiles or fighting force.

Hezbollah is still restocking, acknowledging this month that explosives seized by Lebanese authorities belonged to it and were intended for use against Israel. A Hezbollah official and a Lebanese security source told Reuters they were specifically for its explosive drones.

Israel’s remote warfare proved a challenge, sources say

The group will also need to repair command-and-control capabilities after losses on key fronts, including the flashpoint town of Bint Jbeil and the strategic Ali al-Taher ridge, according to one of the Lebanese sources and three security officials.

They said Hezbollah’s tactic of operating in small units and rationing the use of anti-tank rockets left some units isolated on those fronts, struggling to confront Israel’s remotely operated systems including weaponized drones and armed remote-controlled vehicles.

The Israeli military told Reuters it uses remotely operated systems to monitor southern Lebanon and reduce troops’ threat exposure.

Hezbollah has not explicitly said whether it would take part in the eruption of fresh hostilities, but its media office said it was wary of giving Israeli leaders any justification to escalate in Lebanon, particularly as the group was concerned about its constituents being displaced once more.

The Times of Israel contributed to this report.

The Times of Israel Community.

Read the original article on timesofisrael.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

The Times of Israel, running a Reuters report, calls Hezbollah a "terror group" in its own voice and labels the Lebanese dead as "operatives" with no source. It also states Israel's description of its occupation of southern Lebanon as fact: a "security zone" where troops are "dismantling Hezbollah infrastructure". It does name Israel as the actor in the offensive that killed more than 4,000 people, and it attributes most claims about Hezbollah's rearming to named kinds of sources.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “Iran-backed terror group reportedly”

    Why this matters
    The subheading calls Hezbollah an "Iran-backed terror group" in the outlet's own voice, with no attribution to the governments that designate it.
    The impression it gives
    That Hezbollah being a terrorist organisation is an established fact rather than the designation of Israel and some Western governments.
    The context
    Nothing in the article supports the label or says whose designation it is. Elsewhere the article reports Hezbollah as an armed group with a political constituency, which says Israel's presence on Lebanese territory gave it a right to resistance.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Israel’s presence on Lebanese territory gave it a legitimate right to any resistance”

    Show it in the article

    “the terror group nevertheless remains committed to attacking Israel”

    Why this matters
    Here the outlet repeats "the terror group" as a plain noun for Hezbollah, in the sentence that reports its rearming.
    The impression it gives
    That the group's preparations are terrorist preparations, a verdict carried by the label rather than by the sources quoted.
    The context
    The sources quoted describe drones flown into Israeli military positions, and the article says Israeli forces control villages in southern Lebanon. The label adds a verdict that the reported facts do not carry.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Israeli forces now control its heartland of villages in southern Lebanon”

    Show it in the article

  2. Labels people on one side's word

    Serious

    “thousands of its operatives and many of its leaders killed”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls thousands of the people killed in Lebanon Hezbollah "operatives" in its own voice and gives no source for the figure or the label.
    The impression it gives
    That thousands of the dead are confirmed Hezbollah fighters.
    The context
    The article gives no source for this count or this classification. Its own later sentence says the Israeli offensive killed more than 4,000 people and uprooted a quarter of Lebanon's population, with no breakdown of who the dead were.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“triggering an Israeli offensive that killed more than 4,000 people”

    Show it in the article

  3. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “Israel currently maintains a security zone in southern Lebanon”

    Why this matters
    The outlet uses Israel's own term, "security zone", in its own voice for Israeli military control of Lebanese territory.
    The impression it gives
    That the area is a defensive buffer, as Israel describes it, rather than Lebanese land held by a foreign army.
    The context
    The next sentence shows the security purpose is Israel's stated rationale. The article itself says Israeli forces control villages in southern Lebanon and that civilians were ordered out.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Israel says the zone is intended to prevent Hezbollah”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Israeli forces now control its heartland of villages”

    Show it in the article

    “IDF troops are dismantling Hezbollah infrastructure”

    Why this matters
    The outlet states as fact that what Israeli occupation forces are destroying in evacuated villages is "Hezbollah infrastructure".
    The impression it gives
    That the demolitions target only military assets of Hezbollah.
    The context
    This is the Israeli military's description. The article names no independent source, and the area is one where civilians have been ordered to evacuate, so what is being destroyed is not established.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Israel’s military declined to comment”

    Show it in the article

    “Israel has continued to strike Hezbollah targets in southern Lebanon”

    Why this matters
    The outlet accepts in its own voice that every continued Israeli strike hit "Hezbollah targets".
    The impression it gives
    That ongoing Israeli strikes after the ceasefire hit only legitimate military objectives.
    The context
    The article gives no source for what the strikes hit and reports no casualties from them. Whether they hit Hezbollah targets is Israel's claim.

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli occupation forces hold an area of southern Lebanon that Israel calls a security zone, where civilians have been ordered to leave and troops are demolishing what Israel says is Hezbollah infrastructure.

  4. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Minor

    “A US Treasury spokesperson said Iran was running out of money and ways to move money.”

    Why this matters
    The outlet closes the opening section on a US Treasury claim that Iran is running out of money, with nothing set against it.
    The impression it gives
    That Iran's capacity to fund Hezbollah is collapsing.
    The context
    The article's own reporting says Iran sent Hezbollah tens of millions of dollars for military use, on top of around $200 million for displaced families, this year.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“received tens of millions of dollars from Iran”
    • Elsewhere in the article“around $200 million that the group received from Tehran”

    Show it in the article

  5. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Hezbollah’s media office claimed”

    Why this matters
    The outlet uses "claimed" for Hezbollah's statement, a verb that signals doubt.
    The impression it gives
    That Hezbollah's position is less credible than other statements in the piece.
    The context
    US officials in the same article simply "said" their claims, including the contested one that Iran is running out of money.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“A US State Department spokesman said”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Times of Israel

  1. 26 OctReport: Netanyahu likely to fire IDF chief if reelected; Zamir alone in ...3.0
  2. 26 OctAfter reports of rifts over Iran, IDF says it's focused on missions, 'any ...3.0
  3. 26 OctIran says Mecca Agreement meeting in Tehran will discuss ‘Zionist expansionism’3.0
  4. 26 OctIran president urges ‘regional unity’ in meeting with Mecca pact countries0.0
  5. 25 OctTrump says US won't strike Iran today, amid rising tensions0.0

Everything we scored from Times of Israel

See how 13 outlets covered this story