The Jerusalem Post, on Iran, 25 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

Tehran is threatening to respond to a renewed US and Israeli air campaign with strikes on an expanded list of targets, including civilian infrastructure, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal.The warnings, issued publicly and over diplomatic communications, said that Iran would attack not only American bases and warships, but also natural energy infrastructure, natural gas pipelines, airports, and other civilian targets in the Persian Gulf region.Tehran has also threatened to utilize a new array of weapons, including nuclear bombs.

According to Iran International, a media outlet , the head of the Iranian parliament's International Affairs Committee, Mohammad-Saleh Jokar, asked "The Islamic Republic's authorities, in defense of the country and for the purpose of deterrence, to permit the use of deterrent weapons, including nuclear weapons, in the event of a US attack on Iran.” Jokar called for the suspension of Iran's cooperation with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in the event of an attack by the United States, according to Iran International.

He said that countries hosting the US in their territories or airspace would face a "harsh response" and "pay a heavy price."Iran maintains stockpile of hundreds of thousands of missiles, dronesAnalysts, according to the WSJ, estimate Iran to hold hundreds of thousands of ballistic missiles, having resumed production in underground facilities.Iran is apparently leveraging its stockpile of missiles and drones - which remains at significant levels even after Operation Roaring Lion, Operation Epic Fury, and the succeeding blockade on the country - in an effort to deter an attack.In the most recent bout with Iran, .

Energy and industrial facilities in the UAE, as well as gas plants and airports in Qatar, Dubai, Kuwait, and Bahrain were also hit.Tehran aims to cause even more pain in the case of a renewed campaign, especially at a time when interceptor missile stockpiles are under pressure in Israel and in US-aligned nations in the Gulf, following a suspended period of hostilities.Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi wrote an op-ed in the Financial Times, warning that new attacks “will put civilian lives and the well-being of all regional states and the global economy at great risk.” in the recent operations (the Pentagon said that up to 90% of drones, missiles, and naval industry was destroyed), analysts told the WSJ that Iran is more than willing to expand its retaliatory efforts.IRGC runs risk of overextending in retaliatory efforts“The consensus in Tehran now believes that deterrence requires imposing immediate, sustained and substantial costs on its adversaries,” said Sina Toossi, an Iran expert at the Center for International Policy."Iran runs the risk of overreaching if it tries to make good on all its threats," an expert on the Revolutionary Guard, Saeid Golkarat, told the WSJ.

The country needs to carefully manage its shrinking stockpile of missiles, he assessed.“They certainly have the capability to inflict major damage to the region's energy and internet infrastructure,” said Washington Institute senior fellow Farzin Nadimi. “But if Iranians do that, they'll most likely lose their own in reciprocal attacks.”Negotiations have been deadlocked for months, and US President Donald Trump has repeatedly warned Iran that failure to come to an agreement could result in the US attacking Iran after midterm elections in early November.Israel, too, has stepped up its preparations for potential strikes against in recent weeks, with conflicting reports saying that the IDF was planning to strike Iran on October 10 before being reeled in by US President Donald Trump.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

The Jerusalem Post's headline says Tehran threatens nuclear escalation and drops every attribution the body gives, though the body rests the nuclear element on one MP's request relayed by an opposition outlet. The article states the Pentagon's damage assessment as its own fact and calls Iran's government 'the regime' in its own voice. It lists the damage Iran caused in the last round of fighting but says nothing of anyone killed in Iran.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “Tehran threatens strikes on energy, civilian targets, and nuclear escalation if attacked”

    Why this matters
    The headline credits 'Tehran' with threatening 'nuclear escalation' and drops every attribution the body gives.
    The impression it gives
    Iran's government has declared it will escalate to nuclear means, and this is an established fact.
    The context
    The body rests the threats on a Wall Street Journal report. It rests the nuclear element on one MP's request, relayed by Iran International, an outlet the Post describes as opposed to Iran's government. None of that sourcing reaches the headline.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“According to Iran International, a media outlet opposed to the regime”
    • Elsewhere in the article“in the event of an attack by the United States, according to Iran International”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Iran warns of strikes on Gulf energy and civilian sites if attacked, WSJ reports; MP urges nuclear option.

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “Despite the fact that a major portion of Iran's weapons stockpiles and defensive capabilities were degraded”

    Why this matters
    The words 'Despite the fact' turn the Pentagon's assessment of the damage into the Post's own established fact.
    The impression it gives
    The scale of degradation is settled and independently confirmed.
    The context
    The only source given is the Pentagon, a party to the strikes, and its figure appears in the same sentence as a claim.

    Show it in the article

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “opposed to the regime”

    Why this matters
    In its own narration, the Post calls Iran's government 'the regime'.
    The impression it gives
    Iran's government is illegitimate, a verdict the article presents as plain description.
    The context
    This is a judgement in the outlet's voice. 'Iran's government' describes the same body without the verdict.

    Show it in the article

    “the Islamic regime”

    Why this matters
    The closing sentence describes Israeli strike preparations as aimed at 'the Islamic regime'. That fixes the label on Iran's government and ties it to religion.
    The impression it gives
    The planned strikes target a religious 'regime' rather than a state, and that this is neutral wording.
    The context
    The phrase is the Post's own and recurs in its earlier reporting. No source in the article uses it.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  4. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “significant damage was inflicted on US air bases, embassies, and fleets throughout the region”

    Why this matters
    The Post lists the damage done to US bases, embassies and fleets and to Gulf energy sites in the last round of fighting.
    The impression it gives
    The harm in the previous round ran mainly one way, from Iran outward.
    The context
    The article describes the US and Israeli operations only as degrading Iran's weapons. It never mentions anyone killed in Iran. Same-day coverage reports Iranian officials saying Israel and the US killed dozens of senior Iranian officials and members of their families.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 25 OctEx-Mossad chief Barnea intended for Iran to see Israel's operations to overwhelm IRGC6.0
  2. 25 OctIraq braces for renewed Iran conflict after 1,000 strikes on Kurdistan, 600 militia attacks3.0
  3. 25 Oct'Fair game': Iranian officials say US diplomats, officials are targets for assassinations - report3.0
  4. 24 OctIraq believes Israel may have struck militia weapons supplied by Iran - report6.0
  5. 24 OctIran-backed militias in Iraq accuse US of violating airspace, as threats grow - analysis3.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post