Daily Mail, on UK Politics, 31 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

, low-cut tops, red lipstick and nail varnish

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

A bearded Oxford academic has been criticised for wearing giant fake breasts in public despite complaints from colleagues and . Matt Rattley, a lecturer in biochemistry at St Hilda's College, has already attracted online controversy , which also involves wearing women's clothes and makeup. Now three college graduates including a leading clinical psychologist have written to St Hilda's over concerns that Mr Rattley's behaviour 'violates women's dignity', and that it would be 'reasonable for them to feel that it creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating and offensive environment'.

St Hilda's has received at least three formal letters of complaint, including one from the parent of a current undergraduate, with some alleging that the situation amounts to sexual harassment against female students and teachers. Mr Rattley, who was appointed as a non-stipendiary lecturer in 2023, . But speaking on condition of anonymity, an Oxford academic who attended training events alongside Mr Rattley told The Mail on Sunday: 'I was due to attend a series of staff training sessions at Oxford with Mr Rattley.

I ended up missing most of them because I found being around him so distressing. 'At the first session, he was giving a presentation. I was in the front row, so those big prosthetic boobs felt like they were in my face. I didn't know where to look. 'The worst part was that other people were behaving as though he was dressed normally. You're sitting there thinking what you're seeing is hideous and disrespectful, while everyone around you is pretending it's OK.

It makes you doubt your sanity. Matt Rattley, a lecturer in biochemistry at St Hilda's College, has already attracted online controversy thanks to his appearance, which also involves female clothes and makeup 'Another session I attended was during the summer heatwave. Rattley was sitting with his legs apart in a miniskirt, with his underwear visible, flanked by two admiring young women – in long dresses. 'Many of the female staff fawn over him.

He's pretty intimidating because, even without his high heels, he's a very tall, imposing man. 'It does feel like sexual harassment. You feel as though you're being forced to participate in someone's sexual fetish without being given a choice. It's like being forced to watch porn. You either comply or feel you're risking your job by objecting. 'After the training, I sent the organisers feedback, asking how they would respond if the female trainer they hired for the event wore a "strap-on" penis.'

Mr Rattley has frequently posted pictures of himself on social media in low cut tops – displaying vast fake cleavage – lipstick and nail varnish. Another Oxford lecturer told the MoS that students and academics fear speaking out. She said: 'Oxford people are very reluctant to speak out in public about Mr Rattley, because although the University is pretty good about free speech in the abstract, it comes down hard on anyone who says anything about another identifiable member of the University. 'I privately asked a fellow at St Hilda's what, if anything, they were doing about this.

She said that, as far as she knew, no student had complained, and unless and until that happened, it was very unlikely that the College would do anything.' St Hilda's College at Oxford University was founded as a women-only college and became fully coeducational in 2008 A former student at the college said: 'This case is one that really troubled me throughout my time as a student and that I continue to find disturbing and disillusioning. 'At first, I thought it was a joke – fancy dress.

But this is everyday attire. His prosthetic boobs are enormous, exaggerated and cartoonish. 'Had I been an undergraduate in his class, I know I would have felt very conflicted and deeply uncomfortable. I'd also have felt guilt for thinking negatively of someone whose internal state I simply couldn't know. I certainly wouldn't have made a formal complaint. 'I have spoken about this at length with trusted friends and family who agreed the situation is outrageous, but it never felt like an option to be open and public about it because any concerns would inevitably be received as bigotry.'

Speaking yesterday, one of the signatories to the letter, the distinguished clinical psychologist Dr Lucy Johnstone said the college's failure to act so far was concerning. 'I haven't met Mr Rattley so I can't be certain what is going on here. But as a psychologist who has worked with women clients for many years, I do know that in all forms of harassment and abuse, you see denial by the perpetrator, silencing of the victims, and often collusion by institutions. 'But there seems to be an extra twist here,' she continued. 'If accepting an offensive behaviour is presented as progressive and open-minded, it is even harder for women to name what is really going on and speak up about it. 'I cannot understand why the college and the university are apparently unconcerned about possible breaches of boundaries and conduct.

I am particularly disappointed that a college set up with women's needs and women's education in mind seems to be failing so badly in offering women basic protections.' And according to a leading employment barrister, St Hilda's has placed itself at serious risk of legal action. Naomi Cunningham, from Outer Temple Chambers, said: 'It is difficult to see any sensible basis on which it could be argued that his conduct was not sexual harassment of all students and colleagues who come into contact with him. 'St Hilda's willingness to prioritise male sexual entitlement over staff and student wellbeing by condoning Rattley's antics is dismaying.

The fact that no-one has yet complained is testament to what a toxic environment has been created for women (in particular) who stand up to this kind of misbehavior.' In 2023, Ms Cunningham represented Sandie Peggie, the Scottish nurse who won two employment tribunals against the NHS for allowing a trans woman (born male) to undress alongside her – and then suspending Ms Peggie when she complained. Speaking on behalf of both the university and the college, an Oxford spokesman said: 'The University of Oxford is committed to being an inclusive and welcoming place where all members of our community feel respected, valued and able to be themselves.

We expect everyone involved in teaching to maintain appropriate professional standards and to treat students with respect. 'We do not comment on individual personnel matters. Students who have concerns about their teaching arrangements can raise them through established University or college procedures, as appropriate.' Mr Rattley did not respond to a request for comment.

Read the original article on dailymail.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Daily Mail's headline puts the anger in his teaching of female students, though the body reports that no student is known to have complained and the complaints come from graduates, colleagues and a parent. In its own voice the Mail calls the lecturer's appearance bizarre and gives his critics flattering labels. It says he has supporters but quotes none, while printing anonymous claims of sexual harassment and a sexual fetish against a named man.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “Anger as bearded Oxford University lecturer teaches female students while wearing large fake breasts”

    Why this matters
    The headline ties the anger to his teaching of female students, with the words "teaches female students" as the setting for the complaint.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes female students taught by Mr Rattley are angry and have objected to how he dresses in their classes.
    The context
    The body gives no account of any student he teaches objecting. The anonymous academic describes staff training sessions. A fellow at St Hilda's said no student had complained, and the barrister says no one has yet complained. The former student quoted says only how she would have felt had she been in his class. The complaints come from graduates, colleagues and one parent.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“as far as she knew, no student had complained”
    • Elsewhere in the article“The fact that no-one has yet complained”
    • Elsewhere in the article“a series of staff training sessions at Oxford”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Had I been an undergraduate in his class”

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “thanks to his bizarre appearance”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Mail calls Mr Rattley's appearance "bizarre".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as the paper's settled verdict that the way he looks is strange and abnormal, before any critic has spoken.
    The context
    The judgement belongs to the critics the article quotes. When the Mail repeats the same sentence as a caption, it describes his appearance without the word, which shows the plain description was available.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“has already attracted online controversy thanks to his appearance”

    Show it in the article

  3. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “undoubtedly has his supporters at St Hilda's”

    Why this matters
    The Mail states that Mr Rattley has supporters but gives none of them a word, and moves straight to an anonymous critic.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away with only the critics' account, including anonymous claims of sexual harassment and a sexual fetish against a named man, with nothing from anyone who sees it otherwise.
    The context
    Every voice quoted is a critic: an anonymous academic, a second anonymous lecturer, a former student, a psychologist who says she has never met him, and a barrister. Mr Rattley did not respond, and no supporter, colleague or student who disagrees is quoted.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“forced to participate in someone's sexual fetish”
    • Elsewhere in the article“I haven't met Mr Rattley”
    • Elsewhere in the article“did not respond to a request for comment”

    Show it in the article

    “eminent former students”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Mail calls the complainants "eminent", as it later calls one "distinguished" and the barrister "leading".
    The impression it gives
    A reader is told to give the critics' view extra weight because of their standing.
    The context
    The Mail gives the accusers flattering labels while the man accused gets none, which tilts the piece further towards one side.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the distinguished clinical psychologist Dr Lucy Johnstone”
    • Elsewhere in the article“according to a leading employment barrister”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mail

  1. 31 OctAndy Burnham says he is 'open' to UK making a formal apology for slavery as King Charles arrives in Antigua3.0
  2. 31 OctLaura Kuenssberg 'was invited to a threesome by Government minister who lay sprawled on hotel bed with shirt buttons undone and his partner there waiting'6.0
  3. 31 OctApologist for Hamas who praised October 7 massacre as 'beautiful act of liberation' given platform on BBC Today programme7.3
  4. 31 OctGreen Party loses 20,000 members in backlash over 'Zionism is racism' vote8.8
  5. 31 OctHow more than 200 unaccompanied migrant children arrive by boat in Dover EVERY MONTH...and they'll cost Britain millions: SUE REID6.0

Everything we scored from Daily Mail