Daily Mail, on UK Politics, 31 October 2026

8.8out of 10Serious

Green Party

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.7 findings

The Green Party has as it fights . Zack Polanski 's party has plummeted in the polls since passing the Zionism is Racism motion, , at its annual conference. The leader of Cornwall Greens was yesterday the latest councillor to defect in protest at the motion, saying it had 'crossed a line' and that Mr Polanski has only 'doubled down' in supporting it since.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never quotes the motion it is about. The BBC reported its wording: Zionism as an ideology supporting a Jewish state in historic Palestine to the exclusion or domination of the non-Jewish population. Without it, a reader has only the Mail's description and believes the motion calls for abolishing Israel and branding people racist for believing in a homeland.

How we know

It comes after at the conference earlier this month, to the dismay of many members. Backed by Greens for Palestine , . .

This has seen the number of paid-up members dropping by 8 per cent since the spring, with the party now facing a £110,000 annual loss in income for every 1 per cent of members who quit, according to a Sky report. Green councillors across the country have been defecting to other parties following the motion passing. Green Party leader Zack Polanski (pictured) pictured after finishing runner-up in the Holborn and St Pancras by-election at the start of October Newquay mayor and leader of the Greens on Cornwall council Drew Creek yesterday jumped ship to Labour, saying the motion 'crossed a line'.

In a statement, he wrote: 'I had hoped the Green Party would step back from it – but instead, Zack Polanski and the leadership has doubled down. 'I can't stand behind that, and I won't pretend otherwise. I didn't leave the Green Party; the party left me.' He follows at least ten other Green councillors who have defected on the motion being made party policy. In Wealden district council in Sussex, a Green councillor announced she would defect to the Liberal Democrats.

Meanwhile, there were similar defections within Babergh district council in Suffolk. Other Greens announced they would now be sitting as independents after leaving the party over the Zionism motion. One former councillor told the Daily Mail that opposition parties in other places have been reticent to accept defections from the Greens. Mr Polanski was joined by party MPs Hannah Spencer (left) and Sian Berry (right) on stage during the Green Party Conference on October 2, 2026 Co-Deputy Leaders of the Green Party Mothin Ali and Rachel Millward at the party conference They said one Labour figure had been 'very clear' they won't accept any Greens on a matter of 'principle'.

It comes as Mr Polanski's personal leadership ratings slumped to an all-time low this month, with 52 per cent of the public saying they had an unfavourable view of the Green leader. When questioned by the BBC, Mr Polanski insisted that polling showed 'the vast majority of Green voters from 2024' support the policy, but added he wanted to amend it 'at the first available opportunity'. The Green Party announced this week it would set up a 'working group' – which will include Mr Polanski and his deputies Mothin Ali and Rachel Millward – to discuss improving the party's democratic systems.

This came as the motion was . Adrian Ramsay, the Green MP for Waveney Valley, is expected to use an interview with the BBC tomorrow to criticise the changes made to the Greens under Mr Polanski's leadership. According to a report in The Times, Mr Ramsay, who ran against Mr Polanski for leader at the last internal elections, is leading a group of senior Greens calling for a 'conversation about the party's direction'.

Labour vowed to end such pacts with Green councils supporting the controversial motion following the vote, and is expected to provide an update on its plans on Monday. In a sign of things to come, the Labour-Green alliance on Lewes District Council was ended this week through mutual agreement. A Green Party spokesman said: 'We don't provide a running commentary on membership numbers.'

Read the original article on dailymail.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (7)

The Daily Mail tells readers the Green Party lost 20,000 members in backlash over its 'Zionism is racism' vote, though its own figures date the losses from May and the vote came in October. In its own voice it describes the motion as calling for Israel's abolition and declares an 'anti-Semitism crisis' as settled fact, while never quoting the motion's actual wording. It shrinks the vote to 'a small number of activists' by setting the winning tally against the whole membership and dropping the 813 who voted against.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “loses 20,000 members in backlash over 'Zionism is racism' vote”

    Why this matters
    The headline gives a round 20,000 and says these members left in backlash over the vote.
    The impression it gives
    About 20,000 people quit the Greens because of the 'Zionism is racism' motion.
    The context
    The body gives 18,000, counted from May. The motion passed at the conference earlier this month, in October. Most of that period comes before the vote, so the body does not show the losses were a backlash to it.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“with 18,000 members quitting since May”
    • Elsewhere in the article“at the conference earlier this month”
    • On the recordOn 4 October 2026 Green Party members voted 1,022 to 813 for a motion stating that Zionism is racism.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Green Party has lost about 18,000 members since May, according to Sky, as councillors quit over its October 'Zionism is racism' vote.

  2. Uses figures that mislead

    Serious

    “Support for the Greens has fallen off a cliff-edge as talk of the motion has consumed the party, with 18,000 members quitting since May”

    Why this matters
    The sentence ties a membership loss counted from May to talk of the motion.
    The impression it gives
    The 18,000 departures were driven by the motion.
    The context
    The motion was passed at the conference earlier this month, in October. Most of the period since May predates it. The article gives no figure for how many members left after the vote.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“pass the controversial policy at the conference earlier this month”
    • On the recordOn 4 October 2026 Green Party members voted 1,022 to 813 for a motion stating that Zionism is racism.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “lost nearly 20,000 members in less than six months”

    Why this matters
    The opening line rounds the loss up towards 20,000 and links it to the party's current troubles.
    The impression it gives
    Close to 20,000 members have gone, and the motion explains it.
    The context
    The article's own later figure is 18,000. The Green Party declined to comment on membership numbers, and the only source named is a Sky report.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“with 18,000 members quitting since May”
    • Elsewhere in the article“We don't provide a running commentary on membership numbers”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The Greens have lost 18,000 members since May, according to a Sky report. The party's 'Zionism is racism' motion was passed in October, and several councillors have since quit over it.

  3. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “which effectively calls for the abolition of Israel”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Mail says what the motion calls for, with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    The Green motion calls for Israel to be abolished.
    The context
    The motion's text, as reported by the BBC, defines Zionism as an ideology supporting an ethnonationalist Jewish state to the exclusion or domination of the non-Jewish population. Abolition is the Mail's reading, not the motion's words. The article never quotes the motion.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “the motion effectively declares that those believing Jewish people have a right to an ancestral homeland in Israel are racist”

    Why this matters
    The Mail restates the motion as branding anyone who believes in a Jewish homeland a racist, again in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    The motion calls individual Jews and others racist for their beliefs about a homeland.
    The context
    The motion's reported wording concerns a state built on the exclusion or domination of non-Jewish people. The party says it does not discriminate against or exclude people for holding Zionist views. The Mail reported that response itself earlier.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  4. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “a deepening anti-Semitism crisis”

    Why this matters
    The opening sentence names the party's situation an anti-Semitism crisis in the outlet's own voice.
    The impression it gives
    It is established that the Green Party has an antisemitism problem.
    The context
    The charge comes from the Board of Deputies and the party's critics. The party rejects it. The Mail's own earlier article attributed the charge and printed the party's response. This article attributes nothing.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The Green Party has lost members as it faces accusations of antisemitism from the Board of Deputies over its motion, which the party rejects.

  5. Uses figures that mislead

    Serious

    “passed by just 1,022 members, a fraction of the Greens' near 200,000-strong membership”

    Why this matters
    The Mail measures the winning vote against the entire membership rather than against those who voted.
    The impression it gives
    A tiny minority forced the motion through over a larger body of members who were against it.
    The context
    The vote was 1,022 to 813. A majority of those who voted backed it. The opponents were an even smaller fraction of the membership, and the article never gives their number.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “a small number of Green activists were able to pass the controversial policy”

    Why this matters
    The Mail calls the members who voted 'a small number of Green activists' who 'were able to pass' the motion.
    The impression it gives
    The motion slipped through on the votes of a fringe group.
    The context
    Party members voted 1,022 to 813 for the motion, a clear majority of those voting.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Green Party members voted 1,022 to 813 for the motion at the party's conference.

  6. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The article never quotes the motion it is about. The BBC reported its wording: Zionism as an ideology supporting a Jewish state in historic Palestine to the exclusion or domination of the non-Jewish population. Without it, a reader has only the Mail's description and believes the motion calls for abolishing Israel and branding people racist for believing in a homeland.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  7. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “fallen off a cliff-edge”

    Why this matters
    The Mail says support has fallen off a cliff-edge, echoing 'plummeted in the polls' in S2.
    The impression it gives
    The party's poll rating has collapsed since the vote.
    The context
    The article gives no party poll figure. The only polling it cites is Mr Polanski's personal favourability.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“52 per cent of the public saying they had an unfavourable view”

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mail

  1. 31 OctApologist for Hamas who praised October 7 massacre as 'beautiful act of liberation' given platform on BBC Today programme7.3
  2. 31 OctHow more than 200 unaccompanied migrant children arrive by boat in Dover EVERY MONTH...and they'll cost Britain millions: SUE REID6.0
  3. 30 OctBosses told to act like the 'fun police' at boozy work parties after Labour's 'banter ban' comes into force6.0
  4. 30 OctBurnham rejects 'brutal cuts' to welfare after Chancellor's humiliating U-turn - as UK faces 'worst decade ever'6.0
  5. 30 OctDAILY MAIL COMMENT: Will you EVER grasp the nettle on welfare crisis, Prime Minister?0.0

Everything we scored from Daily Mail