Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on Iran, 26 October 2026

8.7out of 10Severe

Report: Hezbollah rebuilding military capabilities with Iranian funding

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

has been preparing for a possible new round of fighting with Israel over the past three months, using Iranian financial assistance to rebuild its military capabilities, Reuters reported, citing Lebanese security sources familiar with the group's activities. According to the report, Hezbollah has received tens of millions of dollars from Tehran to strengthen its military infrastructure, in addition to approximately $200 million previously provided by Iran to support families displaced by the fighting in Lebanon.

The terrorist organization has been working to replenish its weapons supplies, particularly explosives, while expanding its ability to manufacture attack drones intended to target Israeli military positions. The preparations follow significant losses suffered by Hezbollah during its confrontations with Israel since 2024, including and the destruction of substantial portions of its weapons stockpiles.

Hezbollah has also been attempting to restore its military command structure following setbacks during battles with Israeli forces. Lebanese security officials told Reuters that the organization experienced serious coordination difficulties in several combat zones, including Bint Jbeil and the strategically important Ali al-Taher ridge. According to the sources, Hezbollah's reliance on small fighting units and restrictions on the use of anti-tank missiles left some of its forces isolated and unable to effectively counter Israeli remotely operated weapons systems.

The IDF confirmed to Reuters that it employs remotely controlled military equipment in southern Lebanon for surveillance and to limit the risks faced by soldiers. Despite its rebuilding efforts, Lebanese security sources indicated that Hezbollah has not yet restored its forces or ammunition reserves to the levels it considers necessary for another major confrontation. Earlier this month, Hezbollah acknowledged ownership of explosives confiscated by Lebanese authorities, stating that the materials were intended for operations against Israel.

A Hezbollah representative and a Lebanese security source subsequently indicated that the explosives were designated for use in attack drones. The organization's preparations come amid concerns that renewed fighting between the US and Iran could also lead to an escalation along Israel's northern border. Hezbollah entered the conflict on March 2 by attacking Israel in support of Iran, prompting a major Israeli military offensive. and displaced approximately one-quarter of the country's population, according to the Reuters report.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article starts its account of the war with Hezbollah attacking Israel on 2 March "in support of Iran". It never says the war began with US-Israeli strikes on Iran in February. Without that, a reader believes Hezbollah and Iran opened the war, and reads the talk of "renewed fighting between the US and Iran" with no idea who struck first.

How we know

Hostilities decreased during the summer following an interim agreement between Washington and Tehran that included a ceasefire in Lebanon. Although that agreement subsequently collapsed, large-scale fighting between Israel and Hezbollah has not resumed. Meanwhile, Hezbollah continues to face growing domestic pressure in Lebanon to surrender its weapons. Responding to Reuters , Hezbollah maintained that the continued Israeli military presence in Lebanese territory justified armed resistance.

The organization also disputed claims that its military command systems had collapsed. However, Hezbollah indicated that it was seeking to avoid providing Israel with grounds for another escalation, particularly because of concerns that renewed fighting could force additional residents of its Shiite support base to flee their homes. The US State Department said Washington would continue using sanctions and other economic measures against Hezbollah's financial networks.

The US Treasury Department also asserted that Iran was facing increasing difficulties funding its allies and transferring money abroad. The IDF declined to address Hezbollah's reported preparations, while Iran's mission to the UN in Geneva did not immediately respond to Reuters ' inquiries.

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

Arutz Sheva retells a Reuters report on Hezbollah rearming, but it writes Israel's killings out of its own sentences. It calls the killing of thousands of Hezbollah members an "elimination" of "terrorists" and turns an Israeli offensive that killed more than 4,000 people into "fighting" that "resulted in" deaths. It also starts the war with Hezbollah's 2 March attack and never mentions the US-Israeli strikes on Iran that came first.

  1. Writes the death out

    Severe

    “the elimination of thousands of terrorists and senior commanders”

    Why this matters
    The outlet uses "elimination" for the killing of thousands of people and puts no actor in the phrase.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes in a tidy military result, not thousands of people killed by Israeli forces.
    The context
    These were killings carried out by Israel. The Reuters report as carried by the Times of Israel says thousands of Hezbollah members and many of its leaders were killed. The article never uses the word killed anywhere.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The preparations follow heavy losses for Hezbollah since 2024. Israeli forces killed thousands of its members and many of its commanders and destroyed much of its arsenal.

  2. Hides who did it

    Severe

    “The fighting resulted in more than 4,000 deaths in Lebanon”

    Why this matters
    The outlet makes "the fighting" the subject and gives the toll as "deaths" that it "resulted in". This removes both the actor and the killing.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes more than 4,000 people in Lebanon died in mutual fighting with no one responsible.
    The context
    The article's own previous sentence names a major Israeli military offensive. The same Reuters report says that offensive killed more than 4,000 people and uprooted a quarter of Lebanon's population.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israel's offensive killed more than 4,000 people in Lebanon and displaced about a quarter of the country's population, according to the Reuters report.

  3. Labels people on one side's word

    Minor

    “thousands of terrorists”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the outlet calls the thousands of people Israel killed "terrorists". It attributes the label to no one.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established fact that everyone killed was a terrorist, so their deaths need no further thought.
    The context
    The source report describes them as Hezbollah operatives killed in two wars with Israel. The label "terrorists" for the dead rests on Israel's designation, not on any fact the article gives about who they were.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  4. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “The Hezbollah terrorist organization”

    Why this matters
    The outlet opens its own narration by naming Hezbollah as a "terrorist organization" and gives no attribution. It repeats the label in S3.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the terrorist label as a neutral description rather than a designation made by Israel and the US.
    The context
    The label is a verdict carried in the outlet's voice. Nothing in the article attributes it to a government or a source.

    Show it in the article

  5. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article starts its account of the war with Hezbollah attacking Israel on 2 March "in support of Iran". It never says the war began with US-Israeli strikes on Iran in February. Without that, a reader believes Hezbollah and Iran opened the war, and reads the talk of "renewed fighting between the US and Iran" with no idea who struck first.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 27 OctTrump on Iran war: We had no choice, we didn’t start the war6.0
  2. 26 OctSaudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan hold high-level talks with Iran3.0
  3. 26 OctKatz: Israel never planned pre-election strike on Iran8.2
  4. 26 OctCENTCOM chief declares: Strait of Hormuz is free from Iranian mines3.0
  5. 26 OctTrump on Iran: I’m going to make a great deal3.0

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News