Daily Star, on Iran, 7 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

if Trump nukes Iran

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.7 findings

could blast the nation back into the "Stone Age" if Donald Trump unleashes a nuclear weapon on Iran, a former FBI agent has warned. Fears of an apocalyptic showdown have surged after Trump reportedly weighed up a potential strike on Iran's heavily fortified underground nuclear sites. Iranian state TV has even broadcast , warning: "If the US targets Mount Kalang near the Natanz facility with a nuclear bomb, the danger could reach the surrounding areas."

Left out here: Drops what it reported before

The article never says the US has been at war with Iran since Trump's forces struck it in February, or that the administration resumed strikes on Iran the same day. The Daily Star reported the ongoing war three days earlier. Without it, a reader takes the 'apocalyptic showdown' and the talk of Iranian 'retaliation' to be about a hypothetical first strike, not an escalation of a war the US is already waging.

How we know

Chris Swecker, an FBI veteran with 24 years at the bureau, warned that retaliatory strikes could see sleeper agents sabotage vital infrastructure back at home. He told the Daily Mail: "I think the most realistic retaliation is that the many Hezbollah cells that are here in the United States already actually take matters into their own hands. They have that capability and they can conduct terrorist attacks here."

Swecker, boasting 45 years in law enforcement, said the retaliation could strike power grids, energy plants, or cripple the global economy through digital warfare. "We face a cyber threat, we face the physical threat. And if the financial system were to be compromised or shut down, it wouldn't take a nuclear missile, it could be done via cyber means," Swecker said. "Or they cut an underground cable that runs under the ocean. We'd be back in the Stone Age for a while."

He added that sabotaging essential services would spark mass panic: "You could put one city and render it back in the Stone Age by taking out the power grid or financial system. That would create huge panic in this country." Former CIA operative John Kiriakou also claimed Trump's team is actively looking into a tactical nuclear hit. "I've heard the same thing from my own contacts at the White House, that the President is considering the use of a tactical nuclear weapon against Pickaxe Mountain so it will penetrate to the point that it will destroy everything that's underground," Kiriakou said on Piers Morgan Uncensored.

While Iran does not have the missile reach to hit the American mainland directly, Swecker cautioned that Western targets abroad and the home front remain in the crosshairs. "We can't discount the possibility that someone pushes the button," Swecker said. "That's one of the reasons that we couldn't have Iran with full nuclear capabilities, because they're not responsible, , eliminate Western civilisation."

Meanwhile, Iranian officials in Isfahan have told locals to hide in windowless basements, scrub off radioactive fallout and stay bunkered down for at least 24 hours if the bombs drop. However, Swecker dismissed Tehran's survival broadcasts as psychological warfare. He said: " They want to put fear into them."

Read the original article on dailystar.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (7)

The Daily Star's headline puts in quotation marks words nobody in the article said and calls the cells terrorist sleeper cells as fact. The article lets former US security officials fill the piece, asserts unnamed 'red alerts from security chiefs', and closes with a former FBI agent dismissing Iran's civil defence warnings as manipulation with no Iranian voice anywhere. It also never mentions the war the US has waged on Iran since February, which the outlet itself reported days earlier.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “Terrorist sleeper cells 'primed to blast US back to the Stone Age'”

    Why this matters
    The headline puts 'primed to blast US back to the Stone Age' in quotation marks and calls the cells 'Terrorist sleeper cells' as a fact in the outlet's own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A source said that terrorist cells are already primed and ready to wreck the US.
    The context
    No one in the article says 'primed'. Swecker speaks in conditionals about what could happen, and the body itself says the cells 'could' act. The quoted phrase is the outlet's own composite, presented as a quotation.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“We'd be back in the Stone Age for a while”
    • Elsewhere in the article“could blast the nation back into the "Stone Age"”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Former FBI agent warns Hezbollah could attack US targets if Trump uses a nuclear weapon on Iran.

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “Undercover terror cells lurking on US soil”

    Why this matters
    The outlet states in its own voice that undercover terror cells are 'lurking on US soil', before any attribution appears.
    The impression it gives
    It is an established fact that terror cells are hidden inside the US, waiting to strike.
    The context
    The only basis in the article is one former FBI agent's assertion about 'the many Hezbollah cells'. No official, agency or evidence is cited for their existence, yet the outlet adopts the claim as its own.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the many Hezbollah cells that are here in the United States”

    Show it in the article

  3. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Minor

    “This is just part and parcel of how they subjugate and manipulate their population.”

    Why this matters
    The article ends by letting Swecker call Iran's civil defence warnings a tool to 'subjugate and manipulate their population', with nothing set against it.
    The impression it gives
    Iran's warnings to its people about a nuclear strike are propaganda rather than a response to a real threat.
    The context
    The article's own reporting says Trump weighed a strike on the nuclear sites and a former CIA officer says the White House is considering a tactical nuclear weapon. On those facts, warning civilians about fallout is a response to a reported threat. The outlet sets none of this against the closing claim.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the President is considering the use of a tactical nuclear weapon”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Trump reportedly weighed up a potential strike”

    Show it in the article

  4. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “The prospect of atomic warfare has sparked red alerts from security chiefs.”

    Why this matters
    The outlet asserts that 'security chiefs' have issued 'red alerts' and names no one.
    The impression it gives
    Serving US security officials have formally raised the alert level over sleeper cells.
    The context
    The only sources in the article are a former FBI agent and a former CIA officer. No serving official or alert is identified anywhere.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Chris Swecker, an FBI veteran”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Former CIA operative John Kiriakou”

    Show it in the article

  5. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “they're religious fanatics, and their goal is to basically subjugate Western civilization”

    Why this matters
    The outlet runs a sweeping charge that Iran's leaders are 'religious fanatics' bent on subjugating the West, and gives no Iranian voice or response anywhere in the piece.
    The impression it gives
    Iran's aims are settled fact as a former FBI agent describes them.
    The context
    Every voice in the article is a former US security official. Iran appears only through broadcast excerpts, and no Iranian official is asked to respond to any claim.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Iranian officials in Isfahan have told locals”

    Show it in the article

  6. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “chilling drill alerts to terrified locals”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls the broadcasts 'chilling' and the residents 'terrified' in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    Iranians are in a state of terror, as the outlet describes.
    The context
    The article quotes only a civil defence warning. It reports no resident and gives nothing about how locals reacted.

    Show it in the article

  7. Drops what it reported before

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says the US has been at war with Iran since Trump's forces struck it in February, or that the administration resumed strikes on Iran the same day. The Daily Star reported the ongoing war three days earlier. Without it, a reader takes the 'apocalyptic showdown' and the talk of Iranian 'retaliation' to be about a hypothetical first strike, not an escalation of a war the US is already waging.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Star

  1. 7 NovPiers Morgan mocks US over $20m reward for details on Iran's nuclear programme8.0
  2. 4 NovControversial Trump prison cell billboard in Iran ends with 'US President executed' 3.0
  3. 4 NovDefiant Trump vows he'd 'do it again' as Iran backlash grows and MAGA empire implodes0.0
  4. 3 NovIran prepares for nuclear strikes as 'insane' Trump at edge of 'catastrophe'6.0
  5. 3 NovTrump launches 'secret bombing campaign’ on Iran hours before his fate is decided6.0

Everything we scored from Daily Star