IDF kills four Hamas, Islamic Jihad terrorists in Gaza strikes during weekend operations

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

The IDF killed four Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad terrorists during targeted airstrikes across the Gaza Strip over the weekend, the military announced on Monday.According to an IDF statement, Sunday airstrikes spanning northern, southern, and central Gaza killed three operatives: Alaa Abu Zaid and Hamdan Suleiman Ibrahim Abu Amra, both members of Palestinian Islamic Jihad's military wing, and Fawzi Salam Odat Allah Sawarha, a Hamas sniper accused of directing sniper attacks against IDF troops.

The operations followed an earlier precision strike on Saturday in northern Gaza that killed Muhammad Anan Muhammad Al-Rawaj, identified by the military as the head of a Nukhba cell in Hamas's armed wing.

The military stated that the terrorists had been actively working to restore operational military capabilities and planning attacks against Israeli troops and civilians in violation of the existing ceasefire. In a separate action on Sunday, the IDF also struck and dismantled a military structure in northern Gaza after identifying it as a sniper position targeting Israeli troops.Prior to carrying out the aerial strikes, the IDF took measures to minimize harm to civilians by using precision munitions and aerial surveillance.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article reports only the IOF's account of its strikes. It never says that, over the same period, Israeli fire killed other Palestinians across Gaza. Medical sources reported five killed on Monday, including a seven-year-old girl, and Gaza Civil Defence reported 13 killed and about 60 wounded in 24 hours. Without this a reader believes the strikes killed only four named fighters and harmed no civilians.

How we know

Times of Israel reported“13 people were killed and about 60 wounded by alleged Israeli fire and airstrikes in Gaza”5 Palestinians said killed in Gaza strikes; IDF targets two Hamas commanders (opens in a new tab)
Haaretz (English) reported“Israeli fire killed five people and wounded at least 10 others in the Gaza Strip over the last 24 hours”IDF kills five in Gaza Strip; displaced persons camp destroyed in fire (opens in a new tab)

Troops under the IDF's Southern Command remain deployed across the sector in line with operational agreements and continued efforts to eliminate threats.Khan Yunis tunnel strikeIn a separate announcement on Monday, the IDF stated that an aircraft targeted three terrorists on Sunday after troops spotted them emerging from a tunnel shaft in the Khan Yunis area, situated beyond the yellow line in the southern Gaza Strip.The IDF also stated that following the initial airstrike, additional explosions were heard, indicating the presence of weapons inside the tunnel.

Read the original article on jpost.com

What we found (4)

The Jerusalem Post calls four Palestinians killed in Israeli strikes terrorists in its headline, on the sole basis of an IOF statement. It states the army's claim that it took care to spare civilians as fact in its own voice, and it adopts the army's words, precision strike and eliminate threats. It also never mentions other Palestinians that other outlets reported killed by Israeli fire in Gaza the same day.

Labels people on one side's word
Severe
“IDF kills four Hamas, Islamic Jihad terrorists”
Why this matters
The headline calls the four men killed "terrorists" in the Post's own voice. It drops the attribution the body gives to the military's announcement.
The impression it gives
A reader takes it as established fact that every person killed was a terrorist.
The context
The only basis the article gives for the label is the IOF's own statement. No independent source, no Palestinian account and no check of the claim appear anywhere.
How we know
- Elsewhere in the article“According to an IDF statement”
- Arutz Sheva / Israel National News reported“The IDF announced Monday that it eliminated four terrorists”IDF eliminates four Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists in Gaza (opens in a new tab)
Show it in the article
Written straight
Israeli occupation forces said they killed four men in weekend airstrikes across Gaza, whom the army described as members of Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. The army's claims about them could not be independently verified.
States one side's claim as fact
Serious
“Prior to carrying out the aerial strikes, the IDF took measures to minimize harm to civilians by using precision munitions and aerial surveillance.”
Why this matters
The Post states the army's account of its own precautions as fact, with no attribution.
The impression it gives
A reader believes it is established that the strikes were conducted so as to spare civilians.
The context
This is the IOF's claim about itself. Other outlets attribute it to the army. The same day's coverage reports Israeli attacks killing Palestinians, including a seven-year-old girl, and the IOF saying it was "unaware" of activity in one of those areas.
How we know
- Arutz Sheva / Israel National News reported“The IDF emphasized that precautions were taken before the strikes to minimize the risk of civilian casualties”IDF eliminates four Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists in Gaza (opens in a new tab)
- Times of Israel reported“five Palestinians, including a seven-year-old girl, were killed in Israeli attacks in Gaza on Monday”5 Palestinians said killed in Gaza strikes; IDF targets two Hamas commanders (opens in a new tab)
Show it in the article
Uses a loaded word
Minor
“an earlier precision strike”
Why this matters
The Post calls the Saturday strike a "precision strike" in its own voice.
The impression it gives
A reader takes it that the strike was accurate and hit only its target.
The context
Precision is the army's description of its own weapons. The article gives no independent account of who else was at the site.
How we know
- Arutz Sheva / Israel National News reported“including the use of precision-guided munitions”IDF eliminates four Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists in Gaza (opens in a new tab)
Show it in the article
“continued efforts to eliminate threats”
Why this matters
The Post describes the troops' ongoing deployment in Gaza in the army's language of eliminating threats.
The impression it gives
A reader sees continuing Israeli strikes during the ceasefire as defensive removal of danger.
The context
The phrase is the IOF's own framing for killing people. Other coverage quotes it as the army's words.
How we know
- Times of Israel reported“remove the threat they posed”5 Palestinians said killed in Gaza strikes; IDF targets two Hamas commanders (opens in a new tab)
Show it in the article
Leaves out what changes the picture
Minor
What is missing
The article reports only the IOF's account of its strikes. It never says that, over the same period, Israeli fire killed other Palestinians across Gaza. Medical sources reported five killed on Monday, including a seven-year-old girl, and Gaza Civil Defence reported 13 killed and about 60 wounded in 24 hours. Without this a reader believes the strikes killed only four named fighters and harmed no civilians.
How we know
- Times of Israel reported“13 people were killed and about 60 wounded by alleged Israeli fire and airstrikes in Gaza”5 Palestinians said killed in Gaza strikes; IDF targets two Hamas commanders (opens in a new tab)
- Haaretz (English) reported“Israeli fire killed five people and wounded at least 10 others in the Gaza Strip over the last 24 hours”IDF kills five in Gaza Strip; displaced persons camp destroyed in fire (opens in a new tab)
Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Arutz Sheva / Israel National NewsIDF eliminates four Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists in Gaza (opens in a new tab)
Times of Israel5 Palestinians said killed in Gaza strikes; IDF targets two Hamas commanders (opens in a new tab)
Haaretz (English)IDF kills five in Gaza Strip; displaced persons camp destroyed in fire (opens in a new tab)

Spot something we missed? Report this article

IDF kills four Hamas, Islamic Jihad terrorists in Gaza strikes during weekend operations

Labels people on one side's word

States one side's claim as fact

Uses a loaded word

Leaves out what changes the picture

How other outlets reported it

More from The Jerusalem Post