Times of Israel, on Gaza, 16 October 2026

The Times of Israel reports COGAT's halt of commercial goods into Gaza and does carry the Gaza truckers union's denial, but in its own voice it brands Hamas a "terror group" and "terrorists" four times, hedges the Palestinian death toll twice in one sentence while stating Israel's 1,200 figure as plain fact, and never once names the genocide, the UN Commission finding or the ICJ measures that bear on Israel's control of food entering Gaza. It also leaves out the union head's own account, reported elsewhere, that aid lorries and commercial goods from Egypt did enter that day.

7.3

Serious

out of 10

What we found

  1. Doubts one side's dead and not the other's

    Serious

    “according to the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry, whose figures don’t differentiate between civilians and combatants”

    What the words do
    The Palestinian toll is double-hedged, first with a political source tag and then with a line undercutting the figures' usefulness.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the number of Palestinians Israel has killed is a partisan estimate that may be inflated by fighters.
    What is actually the case
    The same ministry's cumulative count of 74,392 Palestinians killed is the figure in the documented record, and the article attaches no comparable caveat to the Israeli figure in the same sentence.

    How we know

    • On the recordGaza's Ministry of Health recorded the Israeli occupation as having killed 74,392 Palestinians, a cumulative toll that NewsCord's reading of BBC coverage cites as of October 2026.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “killed some 1,200 people on October 7, 2023, and took 251 hostages”

    What the words do
    The Israeli figures are stated flat, with no source and no caveat, in the same sentence that hedges the Palestinian toll twice.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the Israeli count is verified fact while the Palestinian count is a claim.
    What is actually the case
    The 1,200 figure is an Israeli official count, and Israel's own military investigations and memorial records attribute at least 13 of the deaths of 7 to 9 October 2023 to Israeli fire.

    How we know

    • On the recordIsrael's own military investigations and memorial records attribute at least 13 of the deaths on 7 to 9 October 2023 to Israeli fire.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordIsraeli occupation forces' Gaza Division ordered, at 11:22 on 7 October 2023, that not a single vehicle could return to Gaza, and Southern Command at 11:59 ordered any withdrawal into Gaza stopped at any cost.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    About 1,200 people were killed in Israel on 7 October 2023, according to Israeli official figures, some of them by Israeli fire according to Israel's own investigations, and Israeli forces have since killed more than 74,000 Palestinians in Gaza, according to the territory's health ministry.

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The head of the Gaza truckers union, quoted at length in this article, also said that aid lorries did enter Gaza that day and that commercial goods arrived from Egypt through an Israeli-controlled crossing. Without this, a reader takes the Israeli statement that "no commercial goods have entered" as the complete picture of what reached Gaza.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  3. Labels people on one side's word

    Minor

    “Israel has long accused the terrorist group of levying fees”

    What the words do
    The sentence attributes the accusation to Israel but keeps the word "terrorist" in the paper's own voice while doing so.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That only the tax claim is contested, while the criminal character of the accused party is agreed ground.
    What is actually the case
    The article itself reports that Hamas rejects the accusation, and gives no evidence for the label it applies to the party making that rejection.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“in a letter addressed to mediators”

    Show it in the article

  4. Hedges the documented record

    Minor

    “which responded with a massive bombardment and ground invasion”

    What the words do
    The article sums up three years of Israel's assault on Gaza as a bombardment and invasion and stops there, in a piece about Israel controlling what food reaches 2 million people.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the killing of more than 74,000 Palestinians and the cutting off of supplies are a military campaign with no legal finding attached to them.
    What is actually the case
    The UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry found on 16 September 2025 that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza, and the ICJ has ordered provisional measures in the genocide case, including on humanitarian access. The words genocide, ICJ and International Court of Justice appear nowhere in the article.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry found, on 16 September 2025, that Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip.ohchr.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice has issued provisional measures in the genocide case against Israel; this is a documented finding, not an allegation awaiting a reporter's verdict.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “genocide”, “ICJ” and “International Court of Justice”.

    Show it in the article

  5. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “disputes Israeli account but admits Hamas seeking NIS 10,000 per truck”

    What the words do
    The word "admits" in the subheading casts the union head's statement as a damaging concession that undercuts his own denial.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Sheheiber conceded the substance of Israel's claim and so cannot be trusted on the rest.
    What is actually the case
    The article reports he confirmed the Hamas-run Ministry of Economy had asked for the payment, which the ministry told his union was a donation for civil servants' wages, not a tax on trucks.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“not a tax, but rather a donation sought by the ministry”

    Show it in the article

  6. Attaches Israel's denial to a famine finding

    Minor

    “famine was declared in the territory in August 2025 — a determination rejected by Israel”

    What the words do
    The paper sets Israel's rejection directly against the food insecurity authority's famine declaration inside its own sentence.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That whether Gaza suffered famine is an open question between two parties.
    What is actually the case
    The famine declaration is a finding by the body the article itself calls the world's leading authority on food insecurity, and other coverage of this same halt describes Gaza as still suffering from famine.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  7. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    Israel's own military has acknowledged it has failed to build any system that lets aid trucks reach Gazans without passing through Hamas's hands, which bears directly on COGAT's demand that others stop Hamas interfering. Without it a reader believes the problem is simply Hamas's refusal to step aside.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

Israel cites merchants angered by Hamas taxes as commercial ...

Israel cites Gazan merchants angered by Hamas taxes as commercial goods stop entering Strip

Head of private truckers union entering Strip, which terror group claims is a 'voluntary community initiative'

No commercial goods have entered the Gaza Strip for two days, Israeli authorities said Thursday, blaming the suspension on Gazan merchants angered by taxes imposed by Hamas — a claim that Palestinian importers and the terrorist group denied.

The halt to commercial shipments, including fruit and winter clothing, cuts off a key source of food and other critical supplies as fears grow about procuring supplies needed to get through winter in the territory.

The move stands to immediately reduce Gaza’s supplies, because the closed-off territory is completely reliant on whatever goods Israel allows in through border crossings.

Aid groups generally bring in staples such as flour, while merchants import more perishable foods like fruits and meat, according to data released earlier this year by COGAT, the Israeli military body that oversees humanitarian affairs in Gaza.

The suspension is raising fears about affordability, with humanitarian workers saying a combination of aid and a robust commercial market is needed to keep prices under control.

“The humanitarian sector on its own cannot meet the needs of all the people,” said Shaina Low, a spokesperson for the Norwegian Refugee Council, an aid group. “The markets need to be functioning.”

On Wednesday, COGAT announced the suspension of commercial shipments. Its deputy spokesperson, Lt. Daniel Kantorovich, said the agency was acting on a decision made by Palestinian merchants a day earlier and could reverse it at their behest.

“We were prepared to coordinate the entry of their trucks as usual, but the vendors informed us that they were cancelling the coordination due to Hamas’s taxation mechanism and threats against them,” Kantorovich said. “The merchants don’t want to bring goods into Gaza.”

The world’s leading authority on food insecurity reported earlier this year that conditions in Gaza had improved since — but were still at crisis levels. Most families in the war-battered enclave weren’t getting nearly enough to eat, said the report, adding that “even small disruptions to humanitarian access could rapidly reverse recent gains.”

Merchants in Gaza coordinate directly with vendors outside the territory, whose shipments are examined by Israel’s military before entering Gaza.

In announcing the measure, COGAT claimed to be communicating a decision made by local merchants in Gaza who had grown tired of Hamas taxing their trucks and threatening them. on imports to fund its operations.

The agency cited reports that Hamas security personnel had arrested the son of a merchant who refused to comply with the demands, prompting traders to suspend operations out of fear for their safety.

COGAT said the private sector accounted for roughly half of all trucks entering Gaza each week and that no private-sector vendors had attempted to import goods since the merchants alerted Israel on Tuesday.

It also warned the suspension could undermine the ceasefire agreement.

In a letter to international representatives involved in implementing the ceasefire, COGAT said merchants reported that Hamas demanded about 10,000 shekels ($3,200) for every truck into Gaza and that traders sell around 30 percent of goods in cash instead of bank transfers.

But the head of Gaza’s private truckers union, Nahed Sheheiber, disputed Israel’s account, saying that Israel had made the decision.

“The merchants are not the ones who stopped the shipments,” he said. “The Israeli coordinator is claiming that Gaza’s merchants are responsible, but the truth is that the Israelis are the ones who imposed the restrictions.”

Following COGAT’s announcement, Sheheiber’s union met with Gaza’s Hamas-run Ministry of Economy to express concern and say Israel was citing fees levied by the ministry as a pretext to cut off commercial goods.

The Hamas-run ministry had been asking merchants to pay 10,000 shekels (about $3,226) per truck entering Gaza, Sheheiber confirmed. At the meeting, ministry undersecretary Khaled Al-Raqab told the union that the amount was not a tax, but rather a donation sought by the ministry to help pay civil servants in the Strip.

It was not clear from the COGAT announcement whether aid agencies would be allowed to increase shipments into Gaza to compensate for the loss in commercial goods.

The agency claimed that Gaza’s population — of roughly 2 million people — required approximately 250 truckloads of goods each day. That’s far below the minimum of 600 trucks a day stipulated by a ceasefire brokered by the US a year ago.

Hamas rejected COGAT’s allegations in a letter addressed to mediators including Egypt, Qatar and Turkey, saying it “categorically” denied imposing taxes or government fees on commercial trucks.

It said it had not collected taxes or fees on commercial activity in the past three years of war because of the humanitarian and economic conditions in Gaza.

Hamas said the 10,000-shekel figure referred to a “voluntary community initiative” by Gaza’s businesspeople to put money into a “national fund” for relief projects, while the transaction requirement was to inject “cash liquidity” into the territory.

The war started when Hamas-led terrorists while invading Israel, that has killed more than 74,000 Palestinians, .

Read the original article on timesofisrael.com (opens in a new tab)

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Times of Israel

Everything we scored from Times of Israel

See how 28 outlets covered this story